From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:20:26 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#23274 <23274@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#23274 <23274@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user Reply-To: bug#23274 <23274@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:20:26 +0000 retitle 23274 Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivil= eged user reassign 23274 guix submitter 23274 Leo Famulari severity 23274 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 11 21:22:29 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2016 01:22:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1apn2C-0002tW-W3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1apn2B-0002tJ-OM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apn25-000122-Ql for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:45370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apn25-00011r-Mk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apn24-0000TQ-Q6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apn21-0000zV-Jz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:20 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:47897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apn21-0000yj-GN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:17 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4546E22049; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=LnS5wfCKW8LMemxegl40CTRW3nk =; b=tCOWPzQrapAaFvdaBG3xgC2hMNG9kWQxyImzrMd/PcSeH6HZ+6zILsK+cmF wWkJQSPrmuEi5FfAeRI06ScCKlE76ho7ildizHYy6O3DAloJw+R4RPG5iQ2y0j2h 6NToQa8hWcztYjB+6eLHyakEgqZgnvzaPEY4iHZPI8V+8N2k= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=Ln S5wfCKW8LMemxegl40CTRW3nk=; b=jI6tkRHcuSzUHT9Y4/5raxeypYNAcheSc9 s2Mprs0NrkesBGT6ir65Zd6qR+Pwp0zgkHEt8K+ejCpm9YRaeR8a8yLS0pUEn2OP yoG6tLUWuQMGPFjrgO8od+3wzst4UPiB4ZVWjSBs1J5lUa3G1B22O1R/wVF8L0Lf yvWD2y5qQ= X-Sasl-enc: P7wuGRIw5rtZBrt7VU1LV28JbqnCdiYOg4O2y+QKGtDM 1460424136 Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 00D4AC0001A for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:37 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user Message-ID: <20160412012237.GA24435@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) When trying to start the guix-daemon as an unprivileged user, the following error message is printed: error: cannot bind to socket `/var/guix/daemon-socket/socket': Address already in use Would it make sense to try to provide a more helpful error message? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 02 18:35:56 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2016 22:35:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUiI0-0000d4-9u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:35:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUiHy-0000cr-Jh for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:35:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUiHo-0002Xd-MT for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:35:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUiHo-0002WZ-IL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:35:44 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:56770 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bUiHm-0008C0-7h for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:35:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:35:40 +0200 Message-Id: <87h9b27q9v.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #23274 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) severity 23274 minor From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 09 10:29:20 2017 Received: (at 23274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2017 15:29:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNh44-0002ZL-CJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:29:20 -0500 Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.50.10]:52256 helo=smtp.uni-bremen.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNh41-0002Z5-LA for 23274@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:29:18 -0500 Received: from [192.168.178.5] (ip4d17ce1a.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [77.23.206.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37F6C204B8 for <23274@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:29:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=uni-bremen.de; s=dkim; t=1512833351; bh=Pqb7nIUtrbJ5gcvRaL7HNlpOuGmFhB71e9GeFUH7Jfo=; h=To:From:Date; b=g12eevRXhilc2o6SLgEm3hJZ/MdiUGIthvFBKKlCqkguhmlg4Xfeom+FsfRqww4v8 o+USpr/VwK0liekVG6+FHOevP2jZr99K4bdtFMwOtYiZ8H2QT/Chlx44VWVdc01PIG /WXdXlhJQGN0nYbJ1yN3RhrSkyhWoncVm3kuna3A= To: 23274@debbugs.gnu.org From: Martin Castillo Subject: Re: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user Message-ID: <337b943b-56a1-f863-104e-8b309b18fb5d@uni-bremen.de> Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:28:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GebDaU8TU4JqMD82oVFG9GLBs6XIuX3ug" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23274 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --GebDaU8TU4JqMD82oVFG9GLBs6XIuX3ug Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="9DV4UnXFHw4X6Uf59XwxLqB5k7QH33e4F"; protected-headers="v1" From: Martin Castillo To: 23274@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <337b943b-56a1-f863-104e-8b309b18fb5d@uni-bremen.de> Subject: Re: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user --9DV4UnXFHw4X6Uf59XwxLqB5k7QH33e4F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =E2=80=9CAddress already in use=E2=80=9D makes me directly think that the= re is already another daemon running. Strangely, starting another daemon as root works. It seems to take the socket from the other daemon away. Is this intended? Or can two daemons run in parallel without problems? What is your use case? Do you want to run the daemon us unprivileged user or did you forget to add sudo? Martin --=20 GPG: 7FDE 7190 2F73 2C50 236E 403D CC13 48F1 E644 08EC --9DV4UnXFHw4X6Uf59XwxLqB5k7QH33e4F-- --GebDaU8TU4JqMD82oVFG9GLBs6XIuX3ug Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE61CTslYA+K5btSvb61vedmKoYVkFAlosATsACgkQ61vedmKo YVlsrwgAiSbPdMDvTcFasDANfeWWH9Xv065pxcFdPuj4Z53JC0lf7DVjoIUIteed iVEzU4+4c7IKKpqzj4BVuQK5f+YmuTJnq2nLB71sJwc77UC84Ji02gDA5jpnCjo9 +69NS8x+DbDe34+6K3QDK/JXBQ0HpJMCDRFBnP5g6l2VSEr/zmn/ebzSiushAxaC jmy1zq1OY3Xwn2jXVYfSNV8BY/rgZ9zjrtbgo/GeR5HtbWMWn3cEXKjg6/vG3DUk xwpYxn82rfy7QlP+3wfQFdmF6OLPNY4thWQlnG/IsevCRATLvkb/lmqEGvZcDNUN Hl9JXs0iurOdtblWp8xCnzHw2oUlzg== =nzNl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GebDaU8TU4JqMD82oVFG9GLBs6XIuX3ug-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 11 04:35:55 2017 Received: (at 23274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2017 09:35:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56034 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOKV9-0005Ug-Kl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 04:35:55 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:38498) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOKV7-0005UX-AH for 23274@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 04:35:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E9110150; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:35:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhpfuoLvepYN; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:35:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [193.50.110.104]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D2CBF354; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:35:54 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Martin Castillo Subject: Re: bug#23274: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user References: <20160412012237.GA24435@jasmine> <337b943b-56a1-f863-104e-8b309b18fb5d@uni-bremen.de> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 21 Frimaire an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:35:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <337b943b-56a1-f863-104e-8b309b18fb5d@uni-bremen.de> (Martin Castillo's message of "Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:28:58 +0100") Message-ID: <87h8sx4nex.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23274 Cc: 23274@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi Martin, Martin Castillo skribis: > =E2=80=9CAddress already in use=E2=80=9D makes me directly think that the= re is already > another daemon running. Strangely, starting another daemon as root > works. It seems to take the socket from the other daemon away. Is this > intended? Or can two daemons run in parallel without problems? What you=E2=80=99re seeing here is the error return by bind(2) while trying= to bind the listening socket to /var/guix/daemon-socket/socket. guix-daemon doesn=E2=80=99t try to interpret the error in any way, it just = shows you what the OS reported. So I=E2=80=99m not sure there=E2=80=99s really an issue here. WDYT? Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 11 08:25:09 2017 Received: (at 23274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2017 13:25:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOO4z-00054w-Ck for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:25:09 -0500 Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.50.10]:50154 helo=smtp.uni-bremen.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOO4w-00054I-Hh for 23274@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:25:08 -0500 Received: from eduroam-pool12-168.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-pool12-168.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.152.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C7E92038C; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:25:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=uni-bremen.de; s=dkim; t=1512998700; bh=PB2dgdOqbNmN9EQzxUCVqaY66GrLBxdZdMXUAtxfFNg=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:To:CC:From; b=AH95YAKr23VQl+f4IN8uiB83/c4WMvDY4u8knWILiVPOBbbtbeydzk0srcHR3l2mA DYBIHgX7JDnPSB9iUztwNeWN2Gk+OQs7d0uywf24pQ34i85mQ93FOkNwn+/1wgZBe0 CnSAjm40nAI4Cb5+06vYCL0ePDHgFd0ZhNxOREIk= Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:25:00 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <87h8sx4nex.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160412012237.GA24435@jasmine> <337b943b-56a1-f863-104e-8b309b18fb5d@uni-bremen.de> <87h8sx4nex.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: bug#23274: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user To: ludo@gnu.org From: Martin Castillo Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23274 Cc: 23274@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi, I could have expressed myself more clearly=2E > =E2=80=9CAddress already in use=E2=80=9D makes me directly think that th= ere is already >another daemon running=2E This was in response to OP, saying that I don't think that needs to be cha= nged=2E The rest was about testing it with root and I (half) expected an error mes= sage that explicitly says, that another daemon is already running=2E If thi= s was right, op would be right=2E But this is not the case and it seems lik= e it is wanted the way it is=2E So yes, there is no problem in my eyes, too=2E This can be closed=2E Martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 11 11:22:22 2017 Received: (at 23274-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2017 16:22:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQqU-0003Ur-2t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:22:22 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:39829) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQqR-0003Uj-T4 for 23274-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:22:20 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A092D10448; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:22:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PtVpb4rKhnyJ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:22:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [193.50.110.104]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA68410446; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:22:21 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Martin Castillo Subject: Re: bug#23274: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user References: <20160412012237.GA24435@jasmine> <337b943b-56a1-f863-104e-8b309b18fb5d@uni-bremen.de> <87h8sx4nex.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 21 Frimaire an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:22:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Martin Castillo's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:25:00 +0100") Message-ID: <87zi6pw7yd.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23274-done Cc: 23274-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi Martin, Martin Castillo skribis: >> =E2=80=9CAddress already in use=E2=80=9D makes me directly think that th= ere is already >>another daemon running. > > This was in response to OP, saying that I don't think that needs to be ch= anged. > > The rest was about testing it with root and I (half) expected an error me= ssage that explicitly says, that another daemon is already running. If this= was right, op would be right. But this is not the case and it seems like i= t is wanted the way it is. > > So yes, there is no problem in my eyes, too. This can be closed. OK, I had completely misunderstood, thanks for clarifying. Closing! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:20:26 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator