From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 08 17:55:17 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2016 21:55:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54993 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeN3-0001Wg-I4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:55:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35219) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeN1-0001WS-NQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:55:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeMv-00050f-LR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:55:10 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:57857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeMv-00050b-Id for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:55:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeMu-0004Ul-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:55:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeMt-0004zc-Cp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:55:08 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]:36196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeMt-0004zK-8Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:55:07 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id y204so150997321oie.3 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:55:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=te9S7NcAjOrsj0D3eqB5EAWhBCyonshChW1rfEL+vuw=; b=dVBh89cxDmBOyw+4Bci7nwQn7Eo31d71Mi8eHo0s/NK3sTp8OSFn/m4gw+PiQXpeiX 839S9JQ6pCODTR2/rZ2YjcD8ybwkzhfpR2d6bLcun8JjOx/KqVFopiwMOwfSKMIurpiP PKNbJ2Q7Er8t8Ib7Mn5r9ODPb/eE7WGNu0phHE2J2HISHFnjcbYGNYtz3foDMFFUVPPP IAskeToH5J/MLVaLHp17xtffMi+evj4yPUa4K1EgInDeHPPCp0lhgd7D2zPvY3y45mRC m2CbDtoGZxMwX2G/b85Cy4SZm4cp+ZS2SpX+AeGEl9E1na1LOL6AMkbZ6S6zquYzjZhr qjNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=te9S7NcAjOrsj0D3eqB5EAWhBCyonshChW1rfEL+vuw=; b=KDP8H3CyoKsM7+fcDILX4/q+2KfIOi6qRR1W8tizOevPQgSCaluaGDtj16wwlvj445 IFCDs6vGH0bq1NXMrpAPne7ZEUCK2A82HmIrjZmkazNdL45mzc3cpt8f2CRFOwrSMtL1 62hR+a7/AWZiASsJdfSIpKXAseI1XW3zJyIFjjQ+EilwyhdEVcPx+5DpDXFj2XidWtTZ dSJEtiAMfA8qHAo7KP86W8e8oAydQxQOT51SMEHla63QAAmBq8KbM4VaMP+OTk/qXhAu Z2J3S6BSyok9pDb69+sumizTcbYpo/rDD9o4XBSoGoIKZppOPk5Ih1t5xgChWHhs8l/v N3DA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK01eTjqA+jlW0RXJcIiKKjcrNflyeXGcsnFRlx/GSZIpOEgPVfYZL/XSkRpfqvkJm9g8DUBpqIJuT+1w== X-Received: by 10.157.59.119 with SMTP id z110mr5202542otb.164.1460152506359; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:55:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kaushal Modi Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 21:54:56 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: 25.0.92: Documentation bug about Control modified key bindings To: "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140707c75a7b10530003fa3 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --001a1140707c75a7b10530003fa3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This discussion recently came up on emacs.stackexchange.. http://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/21524/115 The emacs manual (C-h i g (emacs) Modifier Keys) says the below: "A -modified alphabetical character is always considered case-insensitive: Emacs always treats =E2=80=98C-A=E2=80=99 as =E2=80=98C-a= =E2=80=99, =E2=80=98C-B=E2=80=99 as =E2=80=98C-b=E2=80=99, and so forth. The reason for this is historical." But I am able to bind something like (global-set-key (kbd "C-S-n") #'previous-line) and have C-n and "C-N" call different commands. Does that piece of information about Control-modified alphabetical characters need correction or clarification? Thanks. --001a1140707c75a7b10530003fa3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This discussion recently came up on emacs.stackexchange.. = http://emacs.stackex= change.com/a/21524/115

The emacs manual (C-h i g (emacs) Modifie= r Keys) says the below:

"A <Control>-modified alphabet= ical character is always considered
case-insensitive: Emacs always treat= s =E2=80=98C-A=E2=80=99 as =E2=80=98C-a=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98C-B=E2=80=99 as = =E2=80=98C-b=E2=80=99,
and so forth. The reason for this is historical.= "

But I am able to bind something like

(global-set-key (= kbd "C-S-n") #'previous-line)

and have C-n and "C= -N" call different commands.

Does that piece of= information about Control-modified alphabetical characters need correction= or clarification?

Thanks.
--001a1140707c75a7b10530003fa3-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 09 02:51:35 2016 Received: (at 23247) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Apr 2016 06:51:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aomk3-0002VT-10 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:51:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40197) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aomk2-0002VH-DT for 23247@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:51:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aomjt-0003Bx-BA for 23247@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:51:29 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aomjt-0003Bs-8J; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:51:25 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1089 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aomjs-0003gB-Iw; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:51:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 09:50:47 +0300 Message-Id: <83wpo7i8c8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Kaushal Modi In-reply-to: (message from Kaushal Modi on Fri, 08 Apr 2016 21:54:56 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#23247: 25.0.92: Documentation bug about Control modified key bindings References: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23247 Cc: 23247@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Kaushal Modi > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 21:54:56 +0000 > > This discussion recently came up on emacs.stackexchange.. http://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/21524/115 > > The emacs manual (C-h i g (emacs) Modifier Keys) says the below: > > "A -modified alphabetical character is always considered > case-insensitive: Emacs always treats ‘C-A’ as ‘C-a’, ‘C-B’ as ‘C-b’, > and so forth. The reason for this is historical." > > But I am able to bind something like > > (global-set-key (kbd "C-S-n") #'previous-line) > > and have C-n and "C-N" call different commands. Did you try that on a text terminal as well? > Does that piece of information about Control-modified alphabetical characters need correction or clarification? Not sure we want to enter these details in a user manual. Also, "C-N" and "C-S-n" are not the same thing in this context. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 12 15:41:46 2019 Received: (at 23247) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2019 19:41:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34240 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNGs-0000Ib-8C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:41:46 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:38604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNGq-0000IT-Hl for 23247@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:41:44 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNGm-0007eV-Tu; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 21:41:43 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#23247: 25.0.92: Documentation bug about Control modified key bindings References: <83wpo7i8c8.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 21:41:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83wpo7i8c8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Apr 2016 09:50:47 +0300") Message-ID: <87tv8dkayz.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The emacs manual (C-h i g (emacs) Modifier Keys) says the below: >> >> "A -modified alphabetical character is always considered >> case-insensitive: Emacs always treats ‘C-A’ as ‘C-a [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23247 Cc: 23247@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal Modi X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The emacs manual (C-h i g (emacs) Modifier Keys) says the below:=20 >>=20 >> "A -modified alphabetical character is always considered >> case-insensitive: Emacs always treats =E2=80=98C-A=E2=80=99 as =E2=80=98= C-a=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98C-B=E2=80=99 as =E2=80=98C-b=E2=80=99, >> and so forth. The reason for this is historical." >>=20 >> But I am able to bind something like >>=20 >> (global-set-key (kbd "C-S-n") #'previous-line) >>=20 >> and have C-n and "C-N" call different commands. > > Did you try that on a text terminal as well? > >> Does that piece of information about Control-modified alphabetical >> characters need correction or clarification? > > Not sure we want to enter these details in a user manual. Also, "C-N" > and "C-S-n" are not the same thing in this context. I think it would make sense to at least mention these wrinkles in the user manual -- many people don't care about running Emacs in a terminal, and being able to bind shifted alphabetical characters opens up a whole new range of user-definable keystrokes. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 02:13:04 2019 Received: (at 23247) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2019 06:13:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34813 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJX7o-0000kA-Du for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 02:13:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59903) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJX7m-0000jg-Mm for 23247@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 02:13:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54110) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJX7h-0002Sl-9N; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 02:12:57 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2463 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iJX7g-0004aC-Bb; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 02:12:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:12:48 +0300 Message-Id: <838sppmavz.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: <87tv8dkayz.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 12 Oct 2019 21:41:40 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#23247: 25.0.92: Documentation bug about Control modified key bindings References: <83wpo7i8c8.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv8dkayz.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23247 Cc: 23247@debbugs.gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Kaushal Modi , 23247@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 21:41:40 +0200 > > >> But I am able to bind something like > >> > >> (global-set-key (kbd "C-S-n") #'previous-line) > >> > >> and have C-n and "C-N" call different commands. > > > > Did you try that on a text terminal as well? > > > >> Does that piece of information about Control-modified alphabetical > >> characters need correction or clarification? > > > > Not sure we want to enter these details in a user manual. Also, "C-N" > > and "C-S-n" are not the same thing in this context. > > I think it would make sense to at least mention these wrinkles in the > user manual -- many people don't care about running Emacs in a terminal, > and being able to bind shifted alphabetical characters opens up a whole > new range of user-definable keystrokes. It's OK to mention that, but please also add a note that this only works on GUI frames. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 14:06:44 2019 Received: (at 23247) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2019 18:06:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36869 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiGS-0008N9-F1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:06:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35324) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiGP-0008Mw-Vz for 23247@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:06:42 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiGM-0003gF-0W; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:06:40 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#23247: 25.0.92: Documentation bug about Control modified key bindings References: <83wpo7i8c8.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv8dkayz.fsf@gnus.org> <838sppmavz.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:06:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <838sppmavz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:12:48 +0300") Message-ID: <877e58bjv6.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > It's OK to mention that, but please also add a note that this only > works on GUI frames. OK; done. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23247 Cc: 23247@debbugs.gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > It's OK to mention that, but please also add a note that this only > works on GUI frames. OK; done. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 14:06:49 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2019 18:06:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiGW-0008NT-Lv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:06:48 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35344) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiGV-0008NL-1M for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:06:47 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJiGS-0003gR-BQ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:06:46 +0200 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:06:44 +0200 Message-Id: <875zksbjuz.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #23247 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 23247 fixed close 23247 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 23247 fixed close 23247 27.1 quit From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:32:01 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 12:24:11 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator