Subject: bug#23019: parse-partial-sexp doesn't output the full state needed for its continuance.

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:30:32 -0400

> Would you like to see the patch again, or should I just commit it?

I'd like to hear what John thinks about the idea of re-using "nth 5"
instead of adding a new entry, but other than that, I think it's OK
to commit, thanks.

        Stefan