GNU bug report logs - #22976
24.5; setting unread-command-events to non cons puts emacs in 100% CPU use

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 22976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Eyal Lotem <eyal.lotem <at> gmail.com>
Cc: schwab <at> suse.de, 22976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22976: 24.5; setting unread-command-events to non cons puts
 emacs in 100% CPU use
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:39:00 +0200

> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:34:08 +0200
> From: Eyal Lotem <eyal.lotem <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> suse.de>, 22976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> It can be set to any value at all, unfortunately.

That's not what I asked.  I asked whether non-nil, non-cons values
have any meaning in unread-command-events.

> The problem now is that non-cons/non-nil values are ignored.
> 
> The loop to repeatedly thinks there's input so it consumes 100% cpu, each iteration seeing that it isn't a cons
> cell, so there's "nothing to do".

Exactly.  So these values aren't ignored, they create an illusion that
some input is available.  I was thinking about ignoring them entirely,
i.e. treating such values as nil (and maybe even silently replacing
them with nil).

The question is: would that kind of change break something?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.