GNU bug report logs - #22974
make check FAIL: tests/store

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 22974 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 22974 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: myglc2 <myglc2 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: make check FAIL: tests/store
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:06:04 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

git checkout: * master ce6027b gnu: nautilus: Don't propagate gtk+.

======================================
   GNU Guix 0.9.1: ./test-suite.log
======================================

# TOTAL: 61
# PASS:  60
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

.. contents:: :depth: 2

FAIL: tests/store
=================

[make.check.160309.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[make.check.160309.test-suite.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 22974 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: myglc2 <myglc2 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 22974 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22974: make check FAIL: tests/store
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:11:37 +0100

myglc2 <myglc2 <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> tests/store.scm:740: FAIL verify-store
> tests/store.scm:757: FAIL verify-store + check-contents

Does this pass after ‘make recheck’?

If not, could you try:

  rm -rf test-tmp
  make check TESTS=tests/store.scm

?

TIA,
Ludo’.

Message #11 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: myglc2 <myglc2 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22974: make check FAIL: tests/store
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:58:57 -0500

ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> myglc2 <myglc2 <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> tests/store.scm:740: FAIL verify-store
>> tests/store.scm:757: FAIL verify-store + check-contents
>
> Does this pass after ‘make recheck’?
>
> If not, could you try:
>
>   rm -rf test-tmp
>   make check TESTS=tests/store.scm
[...]

git branch -v
* (HEAD detached at ce6027b) ce6027b gnu: nautilus: Don't propagate gtk+.
  master                     9720651 gnu: libass: Update to 0.13.2.
make recheck
[...]
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for GNU Guix 0.9.1
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 1
# PASS:  0
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
[...]

sudo rm -rf test-tmp

make check TESTS=tests/store.scm
[...]
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for GNU Guix 0.9.1
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 1
# PASS:  1
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================

hth - George

Message #16 received at 22974-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: myglc2 <myglc2 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 22974-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22974: make check FAIL: tests/store
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:32:02 +0100

myglc2 <myglc2 <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> make check TESTS=tests/store.scm
> [...]
> ============================================================================
> Testsuite summary for GNU Guix 0.9.1
> ============================================================================
> # TOTAL: 1
> # PASS:  1

Well closing this bug, then.

Perhaps close inspection of the content of test-tmp would have allowed
us to find out what it is that led these ‘verify-store’ tests to fail.

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.