GNU bug report logs - #22966
HTTPS with GnuTLS's 'session-record-port' is inefficient

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:03:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: 22966 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#22966: HTTPS with GnuTLS's 'session-record-port' is inefficient
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 23:02:24 +0100
(guix build download) uses ‘session-record-port’ from (gnutls), which
returns a port to conveniently write to/read from the TLS session’s
“record” layer.

The problem is that every write to the port, that is, every call to
‘write_to_session_record_port’ in the GnuTLS bindings, leads to the
creation of one “Application Data” packet.

For instance, when (web requests) writes an HTTP GET request, it roughly
does:

  (display "GET" port)
  (display " " port)
  (display uri port)
  (display "\n\r" port)
  …

it ends up creating a lot of small Application Data packets.  When
debugging is enabled in (guix build download), that translates to things
like:

  gnutls: [14594|5] REC[0x152c9c0]: Preparing Packet Application Data(23) with length: 1 and min pad: 0
  gnutls: [14594|9] ENC[0x152c9c0]: cipher: AES-128-GCM, MAC: AEAD, Epoch: 1
  gnutls: [14594|5] REC[0x152c9c0]: Sent Packet[4] Application Data(23) in epoch 1 and length: 30

Terribly suboptimal.

The difficulty is that the session record port doesn’t do any caching by
itself, and it shouldn’t, because it’s the application’s responsibility.
So we might have to do our own caching and/or use ‘record-send’ and
‘record-receive!’ instead of ‘session-record-port’.

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 69 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.