From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:58:01 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22935: W32 Binaries should have a top-level directory Resent-From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 22935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22935@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145738518416065 (code B ref -1); Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:14:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2016 21:13:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2Se-0004B2-KS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:13:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60495) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2Sc-0004AY-Jg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:13:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2SW-00086L-GS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:12:57 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2SW-00086H-Du for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:12:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2SV-0004w4-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:12:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2SQ-00084y-Ih for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:12:55 -0500 Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com ([31.216.48.48]:38323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2SQ-00084m-8h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:12:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From; bh=+5A7iM73vwHlkPEVaM+dCyJ5WGMG/OZVPUIopu/E2Yw=; b=VE20mTVGq 7JaFJxoiSMvJv3udkYbiAhQmPQMDNE778ICBALDPWyanuajP/DUaLffyi4ZZYOWiL5SFrECmQ/b0v SDCf7T04e/w3L+wXfRSjnIVnmt9jpNwzAdgJPcPfV57F09A2x19Jv1UdS6MMhxH/QNfHT94xx9TYM U4zuGeu2o9Y7e9wLYVDTsr13DlYYBW76BQw1TlnnEP4HXnOuYfhf2HZTXItM3h3ts5zECwerRnDUp cgP5at83UwkvGBTfBXcv1WaM9G3tz3CplWUKiD27enizLbdG5oAdOVk25henS90uamuX4zLnaA1Bq vR9M1pvr+4bMFs/svKq0c5laA==; Received: from cpc1-benw10-2-0-cust373.gate.cable.virginm.net ([77.98.219.118]:42784 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2SP-000fwX-H7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:12:49 +0000 From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:12:48 +0000 Message-ID: <87fuw2m1pr.fsf@russet.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) I've just noticed that between 24.3 and 24.4 the directory structure of the W32 binaries has changed significantly, and now lacks a top-level directory. Instead, they have the unix style /var, /share, /bin directories. I have discussed the issue with Eli who thinks this is right, and briefly summarise the reasons and my objections here. 1) It's a standard way of distributing MinGW binaryes 2) You can unpack a latter version on top of an existing version, and run multiple versions without fiddling with PATH. My counter is: 1) Having no top-level directory is fairly unexpected for software containing zip file (outside of a package management system). For example, the Emacs W-64 binaries on Sourceforge have a top-level Emacs directory. 2) A top-level directory makes it easily to remove things again afterwards. 3) The windows Emacs distribution now has no obvious README or COPYING notice -- this cannot go top-level, without a top-level directory. I would suggest that future Emacs zip files contain a top-level directory with the same name as the zip file, underneath which comes /var, /share, /bin, plus README.W32, plus COPYING. This still makes it easily to install over an existing distribution with a copy command. From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:58:01 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22935: W32 Binaries should have a top-level directory Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Cc: 22935@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 22935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22935.145746315523822 (code B ref 22935); Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:53:01 +0000 Received: (at 22935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2016 18:52:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39990 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adMkE-0006CA-Sh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 13:52:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43222) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adMkD-0006By-E1 for 22935@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 13:52:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adMk5-0001kh-3a for 22935@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 13:52:28 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adMk5-0001kd-0p; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 13:52:25 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3030 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1adMk4-0006io-Eu; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 13:52:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:52:32 +0200 Message-Id: <838u1sredr.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87fuw2m1pr.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) References: <87fuw2m1pr.fsf@russet.org.uk> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:12:48 +0000 > > I would suggest that future Emacs zip files contain a top-level > directory with the same name as the zip file, underneath which comes > /var, /share, /bin, plus README.W32, plus COPYING. This still makes it > easily to install over an existing distribution with a copy command. I don't quite agree with the last sentence. There's no 'cp' on Windows out of the box, so either people will use XCOPY or the Windows Explorer. Both will by default nag users about overwriting existing files in the destination, and not everyone will know how to work around that. Besides, I think most people will simply leave the files in the directory where they were unpacked, and will then have to play with their PATH or rename the top-level directory. By contrast, if the zip archive does NOT have a top-level directory, it is easy to create one upon unpacking: the 'unzip' command has the "-d" switch for that, and unpacking from Explorer will actually suggest a separate directory by default. From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:58:01 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22935: W32 Binaries should have a top-level directory Resent-From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 22935@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22935.145746576827960 (code B ref 22935); Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 22935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2016 19:36:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40036 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adNQO-0007Gt-1F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 14:36:08 -0500 Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com ([31.216.48.48]:34384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adNQN-0007GQ-0O for 22935@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 14:36:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=2rx5u5n3XTrGNRNQAiiC/C4tjsrJIpb6dtsxI9DnF8A=; b=rj4/LDO3FQxvux+oH4T8yJ3j0e LnFg8ZZB9ugLT67zqom6DXHdxUQrn0xiPElJJaFqWxs8/wfmNL8cq1XCCu/pTla/TElZKwUMbX0Lj e0DF5ZSzQno+cOdWiX1a/Ud4yPe+IVmpRH7XQ9vF3cbkeMY5wXkvEjb1eM9O3WcZbljbIRCP0U7os 0heDFj0PeiNVrtcT05dlnurZzGyqGq9g6Ft8bqHerdfOb7ZIXlgkPSv/3yu9vIa+pREgJHTXg1taN +4Eym1aDZqd2YOJT0uID6LhbcVBsznJo+XwLIZUZ1Ai/yi622xNXeUst4wtfPRPBGnTLXEhRd6J0e FC1q6j5A==; Received: from cpc1-benw10-2-0-cust373.gate.cable.virginm.net ([77.98.219.118]:49196 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1adNQG-001zad-N9; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:36:00 +0000 From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) References: <87fuw2m1pr.fsf@russet.org.uk> <838u1sredr.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:35:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <838u1sredr.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:52:32 +0200") Message-ID: <87pov4iwyo.fsf@russet.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) >> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:12:48 +0000 >> >> I would suggest that future Emacs zip files contain a top-level >> directory with the same name as the zip file, underneath which comes >> /var, /share, /bin, plus README.W32, plus COPYING. This still makes it >> easily to install over an existing distribution with a copy command. > > I don't quite agree with the last sentence. There's no 'cp' on > Windows out of the box, so either people will use XCOPY or the Windows > Explorer. Both will by default nag users about overwriting existing > files in the destination, and not everyone will know how to work > around that. Windows explorer is out-of-the-box, and it asks once whether to merge the contents. I'm not sure how the windows explorer "extract" option behaves My own feeling is that most of the people who are worried about a top-level directory will be power users and will work around the problem. Probably by using "cp" from cygwin or msys. > Besides, I think most people will simply leave the files in the > directory where they were unpacked, and will then have to play with > their PATH or rename the top-level directory. I think most people will navigate to "bin", then short-cut "runemacs.exe" to desktop. > By contrast, if the zip archive does NOT have a top-level directory, > it is easy to create one upon unpacking: the 'unzip' command has the > "-d" switch for that, and unpacking from Explorer will actually > suggest a separate directory by default. Using the "-d" switch requires you to name the directory, which is slightly irritating. And reversing the unpack if you forget is either irritating (requiring three directory deletes) or very difficult (if you already have any of the existing directories where you are unpacking. My own archives without a top-level directory are for package management systems, not for users. There is a reason archives like this are called tarbombs. From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:58:01 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22935: W32 Binaries should have a top-level directory Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Cc: 22935@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 22935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22935.14574673034145 (code B ref 22935); Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 22935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2016 20:01:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40057 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adNp9-00014n-9f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60060) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adNp8-00014b-C8 for 22935@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adNp0-0002xH-1d for 22935@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:37 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adNoz-0002xD-Uz; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:33 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3094 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1adNoz-0007Ga-70; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 22:01:42 +0200 Message-Id: <8337s0rb6h.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87pov4iwyo.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) References: <87fuw2m1pr.fsf@russet.org.uk> <838u1sredr.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov4iwyo.fsf@russet.org.uk> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Cc: 22935@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:35:59 +0000 > > Windows explorer is out-of-the-box, and it asks once whether to merge > the contents. Depends on how you copy. > I think most people will navigate to "bin", then short-cut > "runemacs.exe" to desktop. Yes, and lose emacsclient, and then come back crying. Anyway, it's clear we disagree, so I might as well stop arguing. From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:58:01 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22935: W32 Binaries should have a top-level directory Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 12:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 22935@debbugs.gnu.org, Phillip Lord Received: via spool by 22935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22935.162903151022441 (code B ref 22935); Sun, 15 Aug 2021 12:46:02 +0000 Received: (at 22935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2021 12:45:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mFFVh-0005pi-On for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 08:45:10 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58874) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mFFVb-0005on-MG for 22935@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 08:45:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LoXPM1SoxtRWtHdRJyb7QCb+JVxsar3zOlkcL8kokR8=; b=sGzHh+/nejAUIPskAOZVTY4cQ0 TZSBZUhzCh05et0R1hU2ahrkuAnZ7W0GeYd7vLuXD7uQqMc6hKyiRJr208ioqRz/Ed/71meFGuUK6 T9+3X1KmeGN2eF0zR15Yly4MmMD7ks3xEExKeBqKJ6ezHqstLsbTFQXmyEdA3HKLlaTA=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mFFVQ-0000IS-As; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 14:44:52 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87fuw2m1pr.fsf@russet.org.uk> <838u1sredr.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov4iwyo.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8337s0rb6h.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 14:44:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8337s0rb6h.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 08 Mar 2016 22:01:42 +0200") Message-ID: <874kbqnagw.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Anyway, it's clear we disagree, so I might as well stop arguing. I think the conclusion here was that we're not going to change the layout of the .zip files on Windows, so I'm closing this bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Anyway, it's clear we disagree, so I might as well stop arguing. I think the conclusion here was that we're not going to change the layout of the .zip files on Windows, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 15 08:45:14 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2021 12:45:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46066 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mFFVm-0005pu-6N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 08:45:13 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58888) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mFFVh-0005ox-9A for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 08:45:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1hfo1ZczhpBnFjW/zqofvn8dwBeFTQ8zhzzQDKBwUPg=; b=IEZ1FhekwkSnYBxXVzRFD5Jfoe CeTwhvtZxd7ugS/skq3c2Z5NGn8V5rK+9D/zc2I1bK9duYeFIbQg05dQQH3dFYwoz+9t5wvWTIwJY JztbCMRwvTsGjp2vxbw8ZTW9AiAWYr83Lmt0YvIYpd1nx6gekF85vGuhjRnMxnZGLFXM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mFFVZ-0000Id-H5 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 14:44:59 +0200 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 14:44:57 +0200 Message-Id: <8735ranagm.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #22935 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 22935 wontfix close 22935 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 22935 wontfix close 22935 quit