GNU bug report logs - #22933
M-x guix-edit fails gracelessly when passed an nonexistent package name

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:30:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #23 received at 22933 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 22933 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#22933: M-x guix-edit fails gracelessly when passed an
 nonexistent package name
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:13:36 +0100
Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès (2016-03-08 00:03 +0300) wrote:
>
> [...]
>>> what about using (not tested):
>>>
>>>   (and=> (or (package-by-id id-or-name)
>>>              (match (packages-by-name id-or-name)
>>>                (()        #f)
>>>                ((pkg ..1) pkg)))
>>>          (compose location->string package-location))
>>
>> I like it too!
>>
>>> I know you love my 'pkg' identifier.  ;)
>>
>> No I don’t!  :-)
>>
>> I think we should stick to one identifier style, which is to always use
>> full words (I’m often tempted to use abbreviations and I force myself
>> not to, as silly as I am!)
>
> Good to know, I always thought that things like "pkg" or "drv" are OK in
> a local scope.

Well, ahem, ‘drv’ is an exception…

Otherwise I think the rationale of the “Naming” section at
<http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/style.txt> is a good one.

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 134 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.