GNU bug report logs - #22831
OpenSSL should not depend on Perl

Previous Next

Full log

Message #58 received at 22831 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 22831 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22831: [PATCH 2/2] WIP: gnu: openssl: Restrict allowed
 references for openssl.
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 21:59:25 +0100

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:

> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:42:41AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
>> 
>> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:46:26PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> >> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
>> >> 
>> >> > From 00807e4421757f8d9204f1601de9a8286a408f91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> >> > From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
>> >> > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:24:20 -0500
>> >> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openssl: Restrict allowed references for openssl.
>> >> >
>> >> > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl)[arguments]: Add #:allowed-references.
>> >> 
>> >> For some reason I hadn’t seen it in M-x debbugs-gnu for this report
>> >> today, but the patch looks good to me!
>> >> 
>> >> If we apply it now, it won’t trigger a rebuild (yay!), but will still
>> >> trigger a bunch of regrafting, which is slightly annoying.  What about
>> >> applying it in the next ‘security-updates’ branch?
>> >
>> > Sure. Is it okay if I create that branch?
>> 
>> Sure, no problem.
>
> Since there was already a security-updates job started, how about
> putting on core-updates?

Dunno, what does Mark think?  Let’s check with Mark on IRC.  :-)

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.