GNU bug report logs - #22826
gnupg test failure

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>

Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 10:56:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 22826 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 22826 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#22826; Package guix. (Sat, 27 Feb 2016 10:56:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 27 Feb 2016 10:56:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: gnupg test failure
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:55:39 +0100

gnupg fails its tests:

...
note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-gnupg-2.1.11.drv-0'
builder for `/gnu/store/p91ba6zl4d8gr5ixfqxn8ixhrv13kdv9-gnupg-2.1.11.drv' failed with exit code 1
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/ixcbdqm2xvclfnz4d25nv53wnp6x7alh-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/904rahmy35wrhsfdb26pcfxyirhbmlnk-system.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-linux-libre-4.4.3-gnu.tar.xz.drv-0'
guix system: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/904rahmy35wrhsfdb26pcfxyirhbmlnk-system.drv' failed

More details:

FAIL: gpgtar.test
Test: gpgtar.test
GNUPGHOME=/tmp/guix-build-gnupg-2.1.11.drv-0/gnupg-2.1.11/tests/openpgp
gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter 0x00000000006edd10: read error (size=12276,a->size=12276)
gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter 0x00000000006ee2e0: read error (size=13882,a->size=13882)
gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: WARNING: encrypted message has been manipulated!
gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter: pending bytes!
gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter: pending bytes!
gpgtar: error running '../../g10/gpg2': exit status 2
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#22826; Package guix. (Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:19:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Cc: 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22826: gnupg test failure
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:18:30 -0500

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org> writes:

> gnupg fails its tests:
>
> ...
> note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-gnupg-2.1.11.drv-0'
> builder for `/gnu/store/p91ba6zl4d8gr5ixfqxn8ixhrv13kdv9-gnupg-2.1.11.drv' failed with exit code 1
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/ixcbdqm2xvclfnz4d25nv53wnp6x7alh-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/904rahmy35wrhsfdb26pcfxyirhbmlnk-system.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-linux-libre-4.4.3-gnu.tar.xz.drv-0'
> guix system: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/904rahmy35wrhsfdb26pcfxyirhbmlnk-system.drv' failed
>
> More details:
>
> FAIL: gpgtar.test
> Test: gpgtar.test
> GNUPGHOME=/tmp/guix-build-gnupg-2.1.11.drv-0/gnupg-2.1.11/tests/openpgp
> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
> gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
> gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
> gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter 0x00000000006edd10: read error (size=12276,a->size=12276)
> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter 0x00000000006ee2e0: read error (size=13882,a->size=13882)
> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: WARNING: encrypted message has been manipulated!
> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter: pending bytes!
> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter: pending bytes!
> gpgtar: error running '../../g10/gpg2': exit status 2

We often see this error occur on Hydra as well.  Retrying the build
eventually works, but it would be good to fix this.

      Mark
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#22826; Package guix. (Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Cc: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>, 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22826: gnupg test failure
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:51:40 +0100

Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> skribis:

> Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org> writes:
>
>> gnupg fails its tests:
>>
>> ...
>> note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-gnupg-2.1.11.drv-0'
>> builder for `/gnu/store/p91ba6zl4d8gr5ixfqxn8ixhrv13kdv9-gnupg-2.1.11.drv' failed with exit code 1
>> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/ixcbdqm2xvclfnz4d25nv53wnp6x7alh-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
>> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/904rahmy35wrhsfdb26pcfxyirhbmlnk-system.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
>> note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-linux-libre-4.4.3-gnu.tar.xz.drv-0'
>> guix system: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/904rahmy35wrhsfdb26pcfxyirhbmlnk-system.drv' failed
>>
>> More details:
>>
>> FAIL: gpgtar.test
>> Test: gpgtar.test
>> GNUPGHOME=/tmp/guix-build-gnupg-2.1.11.drv-0/gnupg-2.1.11/tests/openpgp
>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
>> gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
>> gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
>> gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter 0x00000000006edd10: read error (size=12276,a->size=12276)
>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter 0x00000000006ee2e0: read error (size=13882,a->size=13882)
>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: WARNING: encrypted message has been manipulated!
>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter: pending bytes!
>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter: pending bytes!
>> gpgtar: error running '../../g10/gpg2': exit status 2
>
> We often see this error occur on Hydra as well.  Retrying the build
> eventually works, but it would be good to fix this.

Isn’t it the same issue as
<http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22558>?  But that bug was
closed.

Ludo’.
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#22826; Package guix. (Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:59:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>, 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22826: gnupg test failure
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:57:56 -0500

ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> skribis:
>
>> Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org> writes:
>>
>>> gnupg fails its tests:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-gnupg-2.1.11.drv-0'
>>> builder for `/gnu/store/p91ba6zl4d8gr5ixfqxn8ixhrv13kdv9-gnupg-2.1.11.drv' failed with exit code 1
>>> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/ixcbdqm2xvclfnz4d25nv53wnp6x7alh-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
>>> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/904rahmy35wrhsfdb26pcfxyirhbmlnk-system.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
>>> note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-linux-libre-4.4.3-gnu.tar.xz.drv-0'
>>> guix system: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/904rahmy35wrhsfdb26pcfxyirhbmlnk-system.drv' failed
>>>
>>> More details:
>>>
>>> FAIL: gpgtar.test
>>> Test: gpgtar.test
>>> GNUPGHOME=/tmp/guix-build-gnupg-2.1.11.drv-0/gnupg-2.1.11/tests/openpgp
>>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
>>> gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
>>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
>>> gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
>>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG key, ID B27907AA, created 2003-12-31
>>> gpgtar: gpg2:       "Test two (no pp) <two <at> example.com>"
>>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter 0x00000000006edd10: read error (size=12276,a->size=12276)
>>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter 0x00000000006ee2e0: read error (size=13882,a->size=13882)
>>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: WARNING: encrypted message has been manipulated!
>>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter: pending bytes!
>>> gpgtar: gpg2: gpg: block_filter: pending bytes!
>>> gpgtar: error running '../../g10/gpg2': exit status 2
>>
>> We often see this error occur on Hydra as well.  Retrying the build
>> eventually works, but it would be good to fix this.
>
> Isn’t it the same issue as
> <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22558>?  But that bug was
> closed.

It's true that the first message of bug 22558 mentioned two different
failure modes of gnupg-2.1.11's test suite.  However, the subsequent
discussion focused on just one of those failure modes: the one that led
to 14 test failures.  I closed the bug when that failure mode was
addressed.

In retrospect, since these two failure modes have different causes and
different fixes, perhaps I should have filed two separate bug reports
from the beginning.  If we can agree on this, then perhaps we can
consider 22558 to address only the 14-test failure mode, and this bug
(22826) can address the gpgtar.test failure mode.

What do you think?

      Mark
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#22826; Package guix. (Tue, 01 Mar 2016 13:48:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Cc: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>, 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22826: gnupg test failure
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:46:50 +0100

Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> skribis:

> ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

[...]

>> Isn’t it the same issue as
>> <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22558>?  But that bug was
>> closed.
>
> It's true that the first message of bug 22558 mentioned two different
> failure modes of gnupg-2.1.11's test suite.  However, the subsequent
> discussion focused on just one of those failure modes: the one that led
> to 14 test failures.  I closed the bug when that failure mode was
> addressed.

Oh, I see.

> In retrospect, since these two failure modes have different causes and
> different fixes, perhaps I should have filed two separate bug reports
> from the beginning.  If we can agree on this, then perhaps we can
> consider 22558 to address only the 14-test failure mode, and this bug
> (22826) can address the gpgtar.test failure mode.
>
> What do you think?

Makes sense, let’s keep it this way.  We should probably retitle this
bug accordingly.

Thanks for the explanation,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#22826; Package guix. (Mon, 05 Feb 2018 22:15:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: 22826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: gnupg test failure
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 23:14:55 +0100

The current release of gnupg after 2.1.11 is 2.2.4, which is available
on hydra. Can we close this bug?

Andreas
Reply sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 05 Feb 2018 22:47:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 05 Feb 2018 22:47:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #25 received at 22826-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 22826-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22826: gnupg test failure
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:46:36 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 11:14:55PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> The current release of gnupg after 2.1.11 is 2.2.4, which is available
> on hydra. Can we close this bug?

The GnuPG test suite has seen lots of changes since this bug was filed,
and it seems to pass consistently now, so I'm closing the bug.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 06 Mar 2018 12:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 166 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.