From unknown Mon Jun 23 02:22:25 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#2282 <2282@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#2282 <2282@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 23.0.90; rmail -- rmail-summary splits frame into three parts... Reply-To: bug#2282 <2282@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:22:25 +0000 retitle 2282 23.0.90; rmail -- rmail-summary splits frame into three parts.= .. reassign 2282 emacs submitter 2282 ams@gnu.org severity 2282 normal thanks From ams@gnu.org Wed Feb 11 03:18:05 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Feb 2009 11:18:05 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1BBI2R5005259 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:18:03 -0800 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:32799) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LXD4W-0001D7-Ge for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:16:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXD6O-0004mr-95 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:18:01 -0500 Received: from hq.kreditor.se ([213.136.42.58]:2348 helo=auxid.hq.kred) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXD6N-0004mj-Vh for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:18:00 -0500 Received: by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix, from userid 118) id 51C02137AB81; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:17:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from beryx.hq.kred (unknown [10.16.0.106]) by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix) with SMTP id 80E59137A92F for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:17:58 +0100 (CET) Received: (nullmailer pid 20357 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:17:58 -0000 From: "Alfred M\. Szmidt" To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Subject: 23.0.90; rmail -- rmail-summary splits frame into three parts... Reply-To: ams@gnu.org Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:17:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1234351078.506997.20356.nullmailer@beryx.hq.kred> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) When one does a M-x rmail, and then invokes rmail-summary, the frame is split into three parts: +-----------+----------+ | | | | *scratch* | rmail | | | | +-----------+----------+ | rmail-summary | | | +----------------------+ In GNU Emacs 23.0.90.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.11) of 2009-02-11 on beryx Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10402000 configured using `configure 'PATH=/home/ams/l/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/games' 'PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/home/ams/l/lib/pkgconfig'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: C value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: nil default-enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: RMAIL Summary Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: M-x r m a i l y n d d d h M-x r e p o r t Recent messages: Getting mail from the remote server ... Counting new messages...done (5) Saving file /home/ams/RMAIL... Wrote /home/ams/RMAIL 5 new messages read Added to /home/ams/RMAIL.inbox:sysadmin@kreditor Added to /home/ams/RMAIL.inbox:ams@kreditor No following nondeleted message Computing summary lines...done Making completion list... From eliz@gnu.org Wed Feb 11 12:31:44 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Feb 2009 20:31:45 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (mtaout2.012.net.il [84.95.2.4]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1BKVfxe004488 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:31:43 -0800 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KEX008004Z8L600@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for 2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:32:02 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.24.112]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KEX00MIF517UPH0@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:32:02 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:31:28 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#2282: 23.0.90; rmail -- rmail-summary splits frame into three parts... In-reply-to: <1234351078.506997.20356.nullmailer@beryx.hq.kred> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: ams@gnu.org, 2282@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <1234351078.506997.20356.nullmailer@beryx.hq.kred> > From: "Alfred M\. Szmidt" > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:17:58 +0100 > Cc: > > When one does a M-x rmail, and then invokes rmail-summary, the frame > is split into three parts: > > +-----------+----------+ > | | | > | *scratch* | rmail | > | | | > +-----------+----------+ > | rmail-summary | > | | > +----------------------+ Does this happen with "emacs -Q"? cause it never happened to me. Or perhaps you started Rmail from this window configuration: +-----------+----------+ | | | *scratch* | | | +-----------+----------+ | rmail | | | +----------------------+ in the first place?? From lekktu@gmail.com Thu Feb 12 02:25:45 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Feb 2009 10:25:45 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=4.0 tests=MISSING_SUBJECT,NOSUBJECT, VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail-ew0-f10.google.com (mail-ew0-f10.google.com [209.85.219.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1CAPgqi019134 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:25:43 -0800 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so558225ewy.1 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:25:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gUYsPK8xJiC3/fGBUVlRsj2ImkV6vj4sZFYIwdE4q7I=; b=eigeXhdZaAD98qD/CNZKclUOGu5atFjyir600rdvwByd9uT/fg1LZSb2jxAeN8M53T USdwK2mnesMkKl1CVMNWAc2ed3jHenlxW6rmFdmhP+ES9QrvwJX4jAxnQ4iavDOBEI+v 4mBLNh2ZrOTk6n8QSnrGTh5vwZOPU1PAv5z2s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=m3OeZzc4MUtk+tPimVz1+cprIIBl28DmotY0ppNFkiTMJNxhu0aCSIauCo8qCwtV8a qt4e2984NFCiSRMysc7oYfywBhMZQkj1uH1yvHwFXyffyUgRBQ8Ulw6WNH0ZIqwwWJTo 8i9rP7f8Q1/l26UaYvF9SxrzyPS9FiPtwgHNQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.196.13 with SMTP id y13mr560295ebp.135.1234434336596; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:25:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:25:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: From: Juanma Barranquero To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit reassign 2282 emacs,rmail reassign 2302 emacs,rmail reassign 2303 emacs,rmail reassign 2300 spam quit From ams@kreditor.se Thu Feb 12 03:29:39 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Feb 2009 11:29:39 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from auxid.hq.kred (hq.kreditor.se [213.136.42.58]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1CBTZa8002079 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:29:37 -0800 Received: by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2BD1C1379B88; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:29:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from beryx.hq.kred (unknown [10.16.0.106]) by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix) with SMTP id 05DAC1379B7D; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:29:30 +0100 (CET) Received: (nullmailer pid 11043 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:29:29 -0000 From: "Alfred M\. Szmidt" To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 2282@debbugs.gnu.org In-reply-to: message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:31:28 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#2282: 23.0.90; rmail -- rmail-summary splits frame into three parts... Reply-To: ams@gnu.org References: Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:29:29 +0100 Message-Id: <1234438169.681249.11042.nullmailer@beryx.hq.kred> > When one does a M-x rmail, and then invokes rmail-summary, the frame > is split into three parts: > > +-----------+----------+ > | | | > | *scratch* | rmail | > | | | > +-----------+----------+ > | rmail-summary | > | | > +----------------------+ Does this happen with "emacs -Q"? cause it never happened to me. Even with -Q. Or perhaps you started Rmail from this window configuration: +-----------+----------+ | | | *scratch* | | | +-----------+----------+ | rmail | | | +----------------------+ in the first place?? No, initial window configuration looks like this: +----------------------+ | | | *scratch* | | | | | | | | | +----------------------+ But if rmail would split into three frames, based on the window configuration you mentioned, then I would consider it a bug as well. Atleast, it was not the behaviour of rmail before the mbox merge. From rgm@gnu.org Tue Feb 17 09:52:10 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 17 Feb 2009 17:52:11 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1HHq8ZE008111 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:52:09 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LZU53-0008WO-VU; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:50:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18842.63689.889659.707874@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:50:01 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control message tags 2303 moreinfo tags 2282 moreinfo unreproducible merge 1638 2357 reassign 2358 spam severity 2353 wishlist From ams@kreditor.se Fri Feb 27 00:42:43 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 27 Feb 2009 08:42:43 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from auxid.hq.kred (hq.kreditor.se [213.136.42.58]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1R8geHq012598 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:42:41 -0800 Received: by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix, from userid 118) id 50B3913796E6; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from beryx.hq.kred (unknown [10.16.0.106]) by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D7F6137953A; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:42:32 +0100 (CET) Received: (nullmailer pid 25004 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:42:27 -0000 From: "Alfred M\. Szmidt" To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 2282@debbugs.gnu.org In-reply-to: message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:31:28 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#2282: 23.0.90; rmail -- rmail-summary splits frame into three parts... Reply-To: ams@gnu.org References: Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:42:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1235724147.974121.25003.nullmailer@beryx.hq.kred> I have narrowed the problem down a bit, it seems to only happen when I hook a external monitor to my laptop. If I am on my laptop without a external monitor, everything works as expected. If I hook the external monitor, it gets the behaviour I mentioned (three windows). How can I go about debugging this? I am guessing it has to do with emacs' sframe splitting code where it calculates the size somehow, and that gets messed up so it fails to split the frame correctly. From rgm@gnu.org Fri Feb 27 10:13:47 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 27 Feb 2009 18:13:47 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=VALID_BTS_CONTROL, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1RIDiaa013063 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:13:45 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ld7BE-0003gK-6I; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:11:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18856.11468.115910.52930@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:11:24 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control message X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes reassign 2488 color-theme reassign 2500 spam severity 2451 normal tags 2282 = From rgm@gnu.org Mon Nov 9 18:09:50 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Nov 2009 02:09:51 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FAKE_REPLY_C, HAS_BUG_NUMBER,PHONENUMBER,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nAA29nKO022713 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:09:50 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N7gB2-00010s-UD; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:09:48 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 2282@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts cc: "Alfred M. Szmidt" , Eli Zaretskii X-Spook: AUTODIN Yukon Plame CID UNSCOM NWO KGB JPL X-Ran: JH;%h7Ir!1Vj3-c}Ls\@nd%v"%FiNCS?gf-i\4'e4_Z3A:vrl$`t=~5KP"U4ij(@8n17mq X-Hue: yellow X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:09:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii (Replying to old bug) The behaviour described in the original report happens if you make the Emacs frame wider than `split-width-threshold'. Setting that variable to nil will prevent it. I don't know what to do about this. There are lots of pop-to-buffers in rmailsum.el, and any of them could cause such behaviour. See the confusion in bug#1806. From juri@jurta.org Mon Nov 9 23:52:12 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Nov 2009 07:52:12 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, PHONENUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mx1.starman.ee (smtp-out1.starman.ee [85.253.0.3]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nAA7qAv9026110 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:52:11 -0800 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx1.starman.ee Received: from mail.starman.ee (62.65.211.91.cable.starman.ee [62.65.211.91]) by mx1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649783F4206; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:52:03 +0200 (EET) From: Juri Linkov To: Glenn Morris Cc: 2282@debbugs.gnu.org, "Alfred M. Szmidt" Subject: Re: bug#2282: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts Organization: JURTA References: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:48:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:09:48 -0500") Message-ID: <87pr7q95wh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > The behaviour described in the original report happens if you make the > Emacs frame wider than `split-width-threshold'. Setting that variable > to nil will prevent it. > > I don't know what to do about this. There are lots of pop-to-buffers > in rmailsum.el, and any of them could cause such behaviour. > > See the confusion in bug#1806. With the current CVS after `M-x rmail-summary' I see +---------------+---------------+ | | | | RMAIL-summary | RMAIL | | | | +---------------+---------------+ | | | RMAIL-summary | | | +-------------------------------+ I think for RMAIL both following layouts make equal sense on a wide frame: +---------------+---------------+ | | | | RMAIL-summary | RMAIL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +---------------+---------------+ and +-------------------------------+ | | | RMAIL-summary | | | +-------------------------------+ | | | RMAIL | | | +-------------------------------+ The question is what options are necessary to be able to configure RMAIL window layouts? Maybe like `gnus-buffer-configuration' in Gnus? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ From monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA Tue Nov 10 09:59:20 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Nov 2009 17:59:20 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (pruche.dit.umontreal.ca [132.204.246.22]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nAAHxEfQ007328 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:59:15 -0800 Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nAAHxDY2025212; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:59:13 -0500 Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8F7EC3A1DA; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:59:13 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Juri Linkov Cc: 2282@debbugs.gnu.org, Glenn Morris , "Alfred M. Szmidt" Subject: Re: bug#2282: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts Message-ID: References: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pr7q95wh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:59:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pr7q95wh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:48:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3403=0 > With the current CVS after `M-x rmail-summary' I see > +---------------+---------------+ > | | | > | RMAIL-summary | RMAIL | > | | | > +---------------+---------------+ > | | > | RMAIL-summary | > | | > +-------------------------------+ This is a bug, please someone fix it. Stefan From ams@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 09:22:07 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Nov 2009 17:22:07 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nABHM5mi031849 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:22:07 -0800 Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N8GtR-0006RX-2O; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:22:05 -0500 From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" To: Glenn Morris CC: 2282@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org In-reply-to: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:09:48 -0500) Subject: Re: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts Reply-to: ams@gnu.org References: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Message-Id: Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:22:05 -0500 Thanks for doing a follow up on this bug. From rgm@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 23:24:18 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Nov 2009 07:24:19 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nAC7OHhL002063 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:24:18 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N8U2R-0003qA-O8; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:24:15 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: ams@gnu.org Cc: 2282@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts References: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: BATF Audiotel MILSATCOM SAPO Syria Clinton anarchy X-Ran: 7wg)0?rp8yW^d~X}J]%5GOSt>'g}rl9;au_z^Bk}&}h;y)sv<=w#bi[WlNR3r`^=Fvqu>$ X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:24:15 -0500 Message-ID: <19skckxl28.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > Thanks for doing a follow up on this bug. Could you confirm your problem goes away after: (setq split-width-threshold nil) I'm tempted to just replace all pop-to-buffers in rmail*.el with (defun rmail-pop-to-buffer (buffer-or-name &optional other-window norecord) (let (split-width-threshold) (pop-to-buffer buffer-or-name other-window norecord))) From rudalics@gmx.at Thu Nov 12 00:19:45 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Nov 2009 08:19:45 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id nAC8Jgqg007199 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:19:44 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2009 08:19:36 -0000 Received: from 62-47-61-218.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.61.218]) [62.47.61.218] by mail.gmx.net (mp056) with SMTP; 12 Nov 2009 09:19:36 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX198gAs91yF8zLpQ8zBjA3ejo5xQyLTmdPVTAacPPm ctiUGYh+VkSqqV Message-ID: <4AFBC517.40605@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:19:35 +0100 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Morris , 2282@debbugs.gnu.org CC: ams@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2282: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts References: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <19skckxl28.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <19skckxl28.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71 > I'm tempted to just replace all pop-to-buffers in rmail*.el with > > (defun rmail-pop-to-buffer (buffer-or-name &optional other-window norecord) > (let (split-width-threshold) > (pop-to-buffer buffer-or-name other-window norecord))) I suppose the following code in `rmail-new-summary' is responsible for the behavior described earlier. (if (and (one-window-p) pop-up-windows (not pop-up-frames)) ;; If there is just one window, put the summary on the top. (progn (split-window (selected-window) rmail-summary-window-size) (select-window (next-window (frame-first-window))) (pop-to-buffer rmail-summary-buffer) ;; If pop-to-buffer did not use that window, delete that ;; window. (This can happen if it uses another frame.) (if (not (eq rmail-summary-buffer (window-buffer (frame-first-window)))) (delete-other-windows))) (pop-to-buffer rmail-summary-buffer)) What is that code supposed to do what a simple `pop-to-buffer' cannot accomplish? If it's to display the summary on top of the frame, then splitting horizontally obviously won't make sense here. martin From monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Thu Nov 12 07:41:40 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Nov 2009 15:41:40 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.183]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nACFfcBU019306 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:41:39 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvIEAJe7+0pMCpsp/2dsb2JhbACBTtwQhDwEiSg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,728,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="49224346" Received: from 76-10-155-41.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.155.41]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2009 10:41:32 -0500 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 51AAE70072; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:41:32 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Glenn Morris Cc: 2282@debbugs.gnu.org, ams@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2282: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts Message-ID: References: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <19skckxl28.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:41:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <19skckxl28.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:24:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > I'm tempted to just replace all pop-to-buffers in rmail*.el with > (defun rmail-pop-to-buffer (buffer-or-name &optional other-window norecord) > (let (split-width-threshold) > (pop-to-buffer buffer-or-name other-window norecord))) No, please don't: the problem is in pop-to-buffer which should never create 3 windows out of 1. Stefan From monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Thu Nov 12 07:42:34 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Nov 2009 15:42:35 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.183]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nACFgX2C019315 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:42:34 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvIEAJe7+0pMCpsp/2dsb2JhbACBTtwQhDwEiSg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,728,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="49224593" Received: from 76-10-155-41.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.155.41]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2009 10:42:27 -0500 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B1DA270072; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:42:27 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: martin rudalics Cc: 2282@debbugs.gnu.org, Glenn Morris , ams@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2282: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts Message-ID: References: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <19skckxl28.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4AFBC517.40605@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:42:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4AFBC517.40605@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:19:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> I'm tempted to just replace all pop-to-buffers in rmail*.el with >> >> (defun rmail-pop-to-buffer (buffer-or-name &optional other-window norecord) >> (let (split-width-threshold) >> (pop-to-buffer buffer-or-name other-window norecord))) > I suppose the following code in `rmail-new-summary' is responsible for > the behavior described earlier. > (if (and (one-window-p) > pop-up-windows > (not pop-up-frames)) > ;; If there is just one window, put the summary on the top. > (progn > (split-window (selected-window) rmail-summary-window-size) > (select-window (next-window (frame-first-window))) > (pop-to-buffer rmail-summary-buffer) > ;; If pop-to-buffer did not use that window, delete that > ;; window. (This can happen if it uses another frame.) > (if (not (eq rmail-summary-buffer > (window-buffer (frame-first-window)))) > (delete-other-windows))) > (pop-to-buffer rmail-summary-buffer)) > What is that code supposed to do what a simple `pop-to-buffer' cannot > accomplish? If it's to display the summary on top of the frame, then > splitting horizontally obviously won't make sense here. Hmm... maybe I misunderstood and the problem may indeed not be in pop-to-buffer, in the end. Stefan From rudalics@gmx.at Thu Nov 12 09:40:42 2009 Received: (at 2282) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Nov 2009 17:40:42 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id nACHeeZr030069 for <2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:40:41 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2009 17:40:34 -0000 Received: from 62-47-62-238.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.62.238]) [62.47.62.238] by mail.gmx.net (mp051) with SMTP; 12 Nov 2009 18:40:34 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/4hzVnGa/4XyMmgjNx676DAc+oXpZPUEpafyoJdi vQkrj+AvVxXRUG Message-ID: <4AFC488F.2070608@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:40:31 +0100 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Monnier , 2282@debbugs.gnu.org CC: Glenn Morris , ams@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2282: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts References: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <19skckxl28.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.8 > No, please don't: the problem is in pop-to-buffer which should never > create 3 windows out of 1. Well, we _could_ implement that ;-) martin From rgm@gnu.org Tue Dec 1 19:05:36 2009 Received: (at 2282-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Dec 2009 03:05:36 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nB235ZDU008257 for <2282-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:05:36 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NFfX4-0006dV-HP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:05:34 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 2282-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts References: <4gmy2vxh8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <19skckxl28.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4AFBC517.40605@gmx.at> X-Spook: TELINT Skipjack AIEWS FIPS140 Abbas mailbomb Exon Shell X-Ran: rXD}V{-(:s\[Y6gj|5ya|dmF:{<+9XW\ev&27,b.kqa|>zwKJ?zRG90(P$u.V*b.v]}'mP X-Hue: black X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:05:34 -0500 Message-ID: <5qeinecby9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii * mail/rmail.el (rmail-pop-to-buffer): New function. (Bug#2282) (rmail-select-summary): Use rmail-pop-to-buffer. * mail/rmailsum.el: Replace all pop-to-buffer calls with rmail-pop-to-buffer, to prevent horizontal splits. From unknown Mon Jun 23 02:22:25 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # A New Hope # A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away # something happened. # # Magically this resulted in the following # action being taken, but this fake control # message doesn't tell you why it happened # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator