GNU bug report logs - #22762
25.1.50; Enhancement/Feature Request: window-local `overlay_arrow_variable_list`

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Keith David Bershatsky <esq <at> lawlist.com>

Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:51:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 25.1.50

Full log


Message #11 received at 22762 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Keith David Bershatsky <esq <at> lawlist.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 22762 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22762: 25.1.50; Enhancement/Feature Request: window-local
 `overlay_arrow_variable_list`
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:36:04 -0800
Because the cursor position remains anchored at a previous position in a non-selected window, my preference would be that the bitmap either remains where it is in the non-selected window OR that it completely disappear until the window is selected again.  After evaluating the following example, I move the cursor upwards or downwards with the arrow key and find myself visually distracted by the bitmap moving in the non-selected window -- especially knowing that the cursor is anchored at a different position in that non-selected window.  When I switch to the non-selected window, the bitmap jumps back to where the cursor was previously anchored.

I like the feature of the `overlay-arrow-variable-list`, but find myself leaning towards using a plain overlay in the fringe with the 'window property to avoid the above-described visual distraction.


(add-to-list 'overlay-arrow-variable-list  'hello-world-symbol-triangle)

(put 'hello-world-symbol-triangle 'overlay-arrow-bitmap 'right-triangle)

(defun my-set-position ()
  (let* (
      (pbol (point-at-bol))
      (my-point-marker (point-marker)) )
    (setq hello-world-symbol-triangle
      (cond
        ((bolp)
          my-point-marker)
        (t
          (copy-marker pbol))))))

(add-hook 'post-command-hook 'my-set-position nil t)

(switch-to-buffer-other-window (current-buffer))

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

At Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:59:45 +0200,
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
>  * * *
> 
> I'm not sure I understand the use case.  Could you please describe a
> sequence of steps that lead to the confusing display?




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 115 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.