From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 20 15:49:43 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2016 20:49:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXETH-0001DR-J2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:49:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXETG-0001DG-33 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:49:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXETA-0006gF-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:49:37 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXETA-0006gB-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:49:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45057) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXET9-0002Po-9S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:49:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXET6-0006ff-2A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:49:35 -0500 Received: from can11.de ([85.25.97.90]:50378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXET5-0006fX-Rv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:49:31 -0500 Received: from m7008 (x4d09731a.dyn.telefonica.de [77.9.115.26]) (Authenticated sender: web421p1) by can11.de (can11.de) with ESMTPSA id D60BC280367 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:49:28 +0100 (CET) From: Frank Haun To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.1.50; Gnus, (setq mm-sign-option 'guided), Gcc header Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:49:28 +0100 Message-ID: <86y4af150n.fsf@m7008.fhaun.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) There is a problem with this setting: (setq mm-sign-option 'guided) and the local mail copy via the Gcc header like this: Gcc: nnml:mail-send-2016 After selecting the key, typing password the mail was sent but the message buffer and the buffer for selecting the key is still open. At this time the local copy isn't written. Selecting the key again and C-c C-c 'ing again, the local copy is written and the buffers are closed. I can avoid this problem by removing the Gcc header. Regards, Frank In GNU Emacs 25.1.50.4 (armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2016-02-18 built on m7008 Repository revision: 5a0472e8ea9128f75bca04f5f65682ae8280c208 Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11702000 System Description: Raspbian GNU/Linux 8.0 (jessie) Configured using: 'configure --prefix=/home/fhaun/opt/emacs-master --with-xft --with-x-toolkit=lucid' Configured features: XAW3D XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG SOUND GSETTINGS NOTIFY LIBXML2 FREETYPE XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS LUCID X11 Important settings: value of $LANG: de_DE.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 23 05:50:03 2019 Received: (at 22751) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 09:50:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCKyp-0007O3-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 05:50:03 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:60016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCKyn-0007NW-Aa for 22751@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 05:50:01 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCKyk-0004od-1v; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:50:00 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Frank Haun Subject: Re: bug#22751: 25.1.50; Gnus, (setq mm-sign-option 'guided), Gcc header References: <86y4af150n.fsf@m7008.fhaun.de> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:49:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86y4af150n.fsf@m7008.fhaun.de> (Frank Haun's message of "Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:49:28 +0100") Message-ID: <878sqfcpfe.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Frank Haun writes: > There is a problem with this setting: > > (setq mm-sign-option 'guided) > > and the local mail copy via the Gcc header like this: > > Gcc: nnml:mail-send-2016 > > After selecting the key, typing pas [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22751 Cc: 22751@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Frank Haun writes: > There is a problem with this setting: > > (setq mm-sign-option 'guided) > > and the local mail copy via the Gcc header like this: > > Gcc: nnml:mail-send-2016 > > After selecting the key, typing password the mail was sent but the > message buffer and the buffer for selecting the key is still open. At > this time the local copy isn't written. > > Selecting the key again and C-c C-c 'ing again, the local copy is > written and the buffers are closed. I'm unable to reproduce this bug. When I try this, I'm prompted for the key twice (which I've now fixed on the Emacs trunk), but it otherwise works. Are you still seeing this problem? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 28 13:59:55 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2019 17:59:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEH0d-0005cW-3k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:59:55 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:33376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEH0b-0005cO-3W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:59:53 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEH0Y-00058f-9L for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 19:59:52 +0200 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 19:59:50 +0200 Message-Id: <87ftkguwrt.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #22751 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 22751 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 22751 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 03:31:17 2019 Received: (at 22751) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2019 07:31:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37910 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJup2-0005nX-I4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:31:16 -0400 Received: from [80.91.231.51] (port=51984 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJup0-0005lt-MQ for 22751@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:31:15 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJuov-0003EX-S0; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:31:13 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Frank Haun Subject: Re: bug#22751: 25.1.50; Gnus, (setq mm-sign-option 'guided), Gcc header References: <86y4af150n.fsf@m7008.fhaun.de> <878sqfcpfe.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:31:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878sqfcpfe.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:49:57 +0200") Message-ID: <87ftjvlr5u.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I'm unable to reproduce this bug. When I try this, I'm prompted for the > key twice (which I've now fixed on the Emacs trunk), but it otherwise > works. > > Are you still seeing this problem? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I'm unable to reproduce this bug. When I try this, I'm prompted for the > key twice (which I've now fixed on the Emacs trunk), but it otherwise > works. > > Are you still seeing this problem? Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnus.org] 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22751 Cc: 22751@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I'm unable to reproduce this bug. When I try this, I'm prompted for the > key twice (which I've now fixed on the Emacs trunk), but it otherwise > works. > > Are you still seeing this problem? More information was requested some weeks back, but no response was given, so I'm closing this bug report. If you're still seeing this problem, please reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 03:31:23 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2019 07:31:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37913 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJup6-0005qX-VG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:31:23 -0400 Received: from [80.91.231.51] (port=51998 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJup5-0005or-25 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:31:19 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJup2-0003Ei-Dw for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:31:18 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:31:16 +0200 Message-Id: <87eezflr5n.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #22751 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 22751 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 22751 quit Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) close 22751 quit From unknown Fri Jun 20 18:16:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 12:24:11 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator