GNU bug report logs - #22692
25.0.91; xref-find-definitions fails to prompt

Previous Next

Full log

Message #74 received at 22692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mike Kupfer <m.kupfer <at> acm.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 22692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: bug#22692: 25.0.91; xref-find-definitions fails to prompt
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 19:36:01 -0800

Hmm, I'm afraid I've gotten lost in all the recent discussion.

If the documentation is made consistent with the (default) behavior,
that would address my core concern.  But it sounds like finding the
right wording ("at" versus "at or near") is a problem because different
backends could have different behavior.  If that's true, would "at, or
possibly near" (or something like that) work?

I'd still like for "valid" to be removed from "valid identifier" because
of the ambiguity about what counts as "valid" in this context.

mike

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.