From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145557303417773 (code B ref -1); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:51:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2016 21:50:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2Q-0004cZ-Fm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47327) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2O-0004cN-1C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2H-0002lG-Tu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:26 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2H-0002lC-QF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2G-0002aQ-Nl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2D-0002l1-GO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:24 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:40333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2D-0002kp-AN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:21 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951AF20A84; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=k61eciUru1x2hxPZ9LAwj6571WY =; b=T/DzdvGuQbys6UbjbMyQE9m/J2gEE1ZBVey6oGoWrNDIt7W9+Daj+vMzxiY FGcGAwV51Mj+u/2HJNGsgWac4M4LQiO+vjiThcaFQQN+1k7NqVDruARVc5MfwLKZ 3GlkQW1CU+Ux20dMunP4fGEBa77blibiX0L9I9bUKv+ABvGQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=k6 1eciUru1x2hxPZ9LAwj6571WY=; b=IBrrsgNL7zkdtCaL4kpyP+GOqeHe4mj0lh hUoLbp89lWLul9gV4ZYPW+bxLBAiEk164c1PsiVvxtRHL2It9adqQrUdaUSkzt91 vEatilm2RYAL8f55mlctkbsDneQ+Skmlq4qP96ObMosKrIHI0j3Adv6A5LWF5Wc8 l5inepMvU= X-Sasl-enc: 8+8bcFRrbxc8B57vtC6xWISc6z46fG5WcNo3fFzYhnht 1455573018 Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3B4FE68012F for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:24 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) ----- Forwarded message from carl hansen ----- http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/ works. BUT it says: "last updated November 04, 2015" So cronjob on gnu.org that updates to the lastest version is not working. Might be the answer to the problem about , too. ----- End forwarded message ----- I see the value of the online manual matching the version of the Guix binaries we distribute, but on the other hand, we get a lot of questions that are answered in the latest version of the manual. Thoughts? From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: "Thompson, David" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.145557656523181 (code B ref 22687); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2016 22:49:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVRxN-00061o-Hz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:49:25 -0500 Received: from mail-yk0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]:32949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVRxL-00061b-D6 for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:49:23 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z13so66019763ykd.0 for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:49:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=worcester-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z7n7OPH/MzDHzdrOQn5FDoxf0tB0IJ0ey1O8HcwHSHY=; b=GOiec4eE3oJgG5vjB/ZYMylPWP7Pc6UAOPV3QQ9lPx7eeIkc4OFnx1nLDB/KsRq8wW l4htH6A0MQ+s/C+0jhZIMM11NV0Anurt41Bnmtco0rUMvetYkFDYWCLj65rUux5Jinfs pse74/uXQBd+H8qDjoi9RqyUL5T4YbWOECn92Lt5k33ce0v1mbkw6FqfaG6ERc3m3uju UpNo3aQUqVQBwjx6d5ykLz1hBfvOVxXXKPOl9M/KcnDu2tGasjcwa87klvTpBe5oXcg6 mF1/dKwdPG9sL7WT+2EQQNqjaRjE7SJvxkkdiu777F1hahfDx7ILX/qWmhXIpNaNT7uf T82Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=z7n7OPH/MzDHzdrOQn5FDoxf0tB0IJ0ey1O8HcwHSHY=; b=CHMiCsy4qsP70apNfiwSLQVtLq0pWv/hUn8qAow6pF61ggOFmzBJ0ReEstqLn2XAMX V9HN7OjBsWHp7mepcHMh/0OoXSlVPE2DFnQRzAQ4M4J5ArYCKo2HT+YdDg3QdMr9yrUj F7tfr2RLywq4VFaMclNEvQIEQEugnBofD0b2N1/FIykLV6Ad+icsuvuih3cmf+WjG4N6 pSccXz2dDEnD8k1H5lpR/I8fdLM6g7m0vjjNJ2tRAbdCX3h1hqnYa0FvURR1HR3Hmy6n hAvX3XSwIrHIkQMqLHjiT684Fu2ymXRyh2gVXVg9revMZmEa9q1Y+TkJmCXfvvboDlK2 ijog== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORo9wBu6IOtxGqYUAXRqXK+XhHdNZI5FEj7/zGmcMT9hylyA+vBy/PNYpHXVxDFV1QEcvmxq3a0CwB+5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.42.5 with SMTP id q5mr10869038ybq.72.1455576557719; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:49:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.25.86 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:49:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:49:17 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Thompson, David" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Leo Famulari wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from carl hansen ----- > http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/ > works. > BUT > it says: > "last updated November 04, 2015" > So cronjob on gnu.org that updates to the lastest version is not working. > Might > be the answer to the problem about , too. > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > I see the value of the online manual matching the version of the Guix > binaries we distribute, but on the other hand, we get a lot of questions > that are answered in the latest version of the manual. > > Thoughts? IMO, this is a "wontfix", but let's see what everyone else thinks. - Dave From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.145561721124757 (code B ref 22687); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:07:01 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 10:06:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40812 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVcWx-0006RF-5v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:06:51 -0500 Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.20]:54434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVcWv-0006R5-9U for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:06:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FA5380E1F; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mdc-berlin.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :message-id:date:date:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from :references:received:received:received; s=mdc; t=1455617201; x= 1457431602; bh=5hmBDLBaXJIh4PlN6EG7tft7g5uZz3rkNEK1lMniQR8=; b=d rQLK2l3CfFQTwiYqgaxmqSC66JSqh6chbcdgD8xuNCEPYuOmZO9fkHMfyXfJFx4o o3aR453Jg1EMWHLjCzMl4nNAaNsLtRIawzo5hFr3Vy3y5DLReKLijBos9ZF85760 5tRR72D7MDqQXXJ2+Yi8K2QAiD25liyHhhVJz20dGc= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mdc-berlin.de Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dBImuO-kwuPt; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (puck.citx.mdc-berlin.de [141.80.36.101]) by pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (141.80.180.135) by HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (141.80.180.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:40 +0100 References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-Reply-To: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:40 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [141.80.180.135] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.000.1202-22134.006 X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.779900-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Leo Famulari writes: > I see the value of the online manual matching the version of the Guix > binaries we distribute, but on the other hand, we get a lot of questions > that are answered in the latest version of the manual. Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we’re encouraging to do “guix pull” (so users really run the development version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest release. ~~ Ricardo From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.14556399188054 (code B ref 22687); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 16:25:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38248 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aViRC-00025q-L9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:25:18 -0500 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:13211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aViRA-00025b-EB for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:25:16 -0500 X-HalOne-Cookie: b891133f513618a218014a0b6abcf1e3ded8f82e X-HalOne-ID: d70bd9f9-d4c9-11e5-8bea-b8ca3afa9d73 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=enge.fr; s=20140924; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=2uJROsfdPEjL9p4M4cdNOYlxUUTc1d/MPemL85aHvPA=; b=d1r5aETo/g3gpyqqw2oJDltp21ZcKlMku8jo9GEC1piBKvM/UU+2whtWE1HF4j0Wcqdrfrg6am2P6 u3vPjuoXnZ/Hec2k6Ns+u1tIElNdoWBbkWIqM7OKyDFOJgbqlLl34Jk4x6ra3eZCGDTgUFqNMdKtW3 iDVrlWozv/KTu6A8= Received: from solar (unknown [92.89.73.211]) by smtpfilter1.public.one.com (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:25:04 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:40AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and > development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we’re > encouraging to do “guix pull” (so users really run the development > version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an > up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest > release. Or alternatively, release more often :-) I wonder whether we should not make a point release after each security update instead of encouraging people to use "guix pull" (but we would quickly arrive at 0.9.9 now, after which only 1.0.0 would be a reasonable option to keep numerical and lexicographical ordering consistent). Or a point-point release as 0.9.0.1 and so on. Andreas From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Enge Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.14556404318846 (code B ref 22687); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:34:02 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 16:33:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aViZT-0002Ic-Am for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:33:51 -0500 Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.20]:58049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aViZS-0002IT-2I for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:33:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24048381208; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mdc-berlin.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :message-id:date:date:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from :references:received:received:received; s=mdc; t=1455640422; x= 1457454823; bh=pmLy70HVgG50R+SPklCgK2FqzhzIuGkhyh2BY4NQ7SA=; b=N 4e7yZwxk4X5ARwwKJNzeEuU3Lu2iAXMFNxy36Q6/G1mnleKuyaxR3qe/10zg0zfb IpLF6enaOkjBJFadFmebHsGQhsgT16zpn5rTVKjvgjju3lG4RcabuNb60nyu0fr0 dPXjrJVO0jIBPtwVuU8ALisb8pky4XCoIxN27lR+4M= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mdc-berlin.de Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iFA8SO5tLkgT; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (puck.citx.mdc-berlin.de [141.80.36.101]) by pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (141.80.180.135) by HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (141.80.180.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:27 +0100 References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-Reply-To: <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:27 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [141.80.180.135] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.000.1202-22136.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.064800-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Andreas Enge writes: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:40AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and >> development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we’re >> encouraging to do “guix pull” (so users really run the development >> version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an >> up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest >> release. > > Or alternatively, release more often :-) I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound like a good idea. > I wonder whether we should not make a point release after each security > update instead of encouraging people to use "guix pull" (but we would > quickly arrive at 0.9.9 now, after which only 1.0.0 would be a reasonable > option to keep numerical and lexicographical ordering consistent). > Or a point-point release as 0.9.0.1 and so on. I would like that. We could make patch releases for each time we merge core-updates / security-fixes into master. ~~ Ricardo From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.14556409499663 (code B ref 22687); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 16:42:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38265 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVihp-0002Vn-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:42:29 -0500 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:36175) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVihn-0002Va-SH for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:42:28 -0500 X-HalOne-Cookie: 11204b8ddb8d6591dbe3f8f4be2aba26681abbf1 X-HalOne-ID: 3f42b92a-d4cc-11e5-882a-b82a72cffc46 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=enge.fr; s=20140924; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to: references; bh=P9IycgZ7XtVjcbo2klO0dmKhlLFARQMLo8RSIZuZEhw=; b=ls1VhKZyaWlHLL8kI315dJ/VRGrtLOieqWzSwlLVqv2F53RCuK8nnwvPf+VEnNjQ10n9o7jhwM0DT eU1n2qYtFF6yzgOx+LqzXbEcCLaD2qXrRP0+h1pqSAAJncjE4Ie+40MlAM0payonLmeIjFHzlUp9O7 Sx5NhvK042CqubAA= Received: from solar (unknown [92.89.73.211]) by smtpfilter4.public.one.com (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:42:18 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound like a > good idea. It is easy enough to have that courage when one is not the person making the releases :-) Andreas From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Florian Paul Schmidt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145564291319000 (code B ref -1); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:16:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 17:15:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDU-0004wO-PO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38128) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDS-0004vv-OQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDM-00018k-8D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:05 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:55413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDM-00018g-4h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDI-0002Dj-0p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDD-00016g-1H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:14:59 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:61939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDC-00016R-Os for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:14:54 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.241] ([77.8.85.57]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLS74-1aVBFP0mgM-000ZBU for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:14:53 +0100 References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> From: Florian Paul Schmidt Message-ID: <56C3590B.7060701@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:14:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:BiDt9VpEJ8M9889J620RxcCs4TPQ/uAkRiDbuPX3Fx2eZUUssvx W1hfGebbgQXtorsE5f9NMZf3Y9miahQtSPD0XJnnSMJGo5K2tB4nRwVzF9dXLfcfa+KxZ5j 2Ccdv7Dkbd+Z5itVuFfgNT2OGb8gh385nmNqwKlcLQtWUErjKKzujqQ/qBQLCo7TA/Wpcj5 3vAvXPMJi7Geaw6tNKEgA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:WTraK+2SqRU=:s8o2s0pSof8FtPWGgYKV+O nl9ToAN+OF1aIPm5b/RS51HwLIH/EjeyOkc6kUWcFCVCeCH7Scg4TpWHrBOWkx4CMd3Yd9mIc YWlIwg+mwGis+pAnV9iGikkQ6lyLWQ5OjVqMhgjz6lu1uZFRWDArvi2q81GR7PpahYBmKEjP8 eWJA00F/IVOTqZGyQkX/UE49ILSjtLG1vQXk+o4AOXhQqteMsRFdnuLKrRnPaZx73YrZQGU2E ccVlxxolAOA9hJ3D0JxXtLjPy3JpgUOGs3nK/MCf8hef4RDy5PjLFXxVj1HlRdfX2ydn1rKDw 3Tmo/CpOycAzYB1OG/DKowpP+1nzD30248cosOms2YKwXrhwdihyuIpnCOhwTAsIlrPjayctr hapxNn5FilQAxvdNx345OAL8x171yIY8tjxmStHTtjOTNLzOEbZoRsQ8GjQ5lSbrUBr9U6BDa XmhJASxWdO0fehcPc36NhxatFpSF1COz4Eos9cSvWDsgOj2uyZJNOxBqsWvARw8U/kUv3pkxb /+fTMn1mLk74Go54gEN2iVjc/FTbkUDO6dSQHCX5Ax9QoXh3XiwZQAib8d8nWleUikhObcyXN NGzo+jgjfYWDewnIdK4MTpeqDmKPJFabmyJSpZBA5bSKrUU67FgSAsDmpEc9ZAi4QZa0kfkpL Rwljm/qfiOCKPyTb8o2sC0Waz5bE0EnSD7B/kNJD2cM2pe8FUl7Cj4OOFKnJoY4zeapbyU/y3 J0IFQUsZ12n0Qx+sJNip2n+HieaZxszRxnVlo+PT54oYAYIicd3DgSW5PciURRG/Vgi2HVFER 9z1CLBc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 16.02.2016 17:42, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound >> like a good idea. > > It is easy enough to have that courage when one is not the person > making the releases :-) Hmm, shouldn't that process be mostly automated? And if not, maybe it's worth thinking about how to do that. I guess from a functional point of view a release is just a function that takes a revision and has as its outputs installer images, binary installers, a new website, yada yada yada.. Regards, Flo - -- https://fps.io -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWw1kKAAoJEA5f4Coltk8Z/6sH/1CuqcAbB+RC/b4bmyBkSJ0z SlJBjkfs9BUxLtjzLXMn52t0dKOmA92CiVpZblTxb0M3rcruOY44Wlkc3J5PqP3U Aqh+YzrowqKHBi+iikftiJYj9X7beh7rWxmM48nWkdtPTfLUYdbi5+AJtz7bwvQ8 ZHx5wilEVaUnXKyiora3V2Nm8bjGQXIfncvQy7rrON2XaNZut8ruIAI0FSn8F4xD WPWP5tuTTdHJNCOSmsPr1kM2kmoBZ3hDs4BeJWbiTUMJTsh3G/P+z1XUBuoS3zWJ CwYrTwZzulq9JTP10JdMOEBcoZ9/za3cpiHM2n8rA1CEpVKRKM/s9tnKZjl+oZ8= =ODkW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Mathieu Lirzin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Florian Paul Schmidt Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.145565508117779 (code B ref 22687); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:39:02 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 20:38:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNl-0004ce-8A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:38:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50420) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNj-0004cO-P3 for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:38:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNc-0003xi-1s for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:37:54 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNb-0003xb-Ug; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:37:51 -0500 Received: from mek33-4-82-236-46-88.fbx.proxad.net ([82.236.46.88]:58118 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNb-0001JJ-Ef; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:37:51 -0500 From: Mathieu Lirzin References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> <56C3590B.7060701@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:37:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <56C3590B.7060701@gmx.net> (Florian Paul Schmidt's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:14:51 +0100") Message-ID: <8737sss86a.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Florian Paul Schmidt writes: > On 16.02.2016 17:42, Andreas Enge wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>> I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound >>> like a good idea. >> >> It is easy enough to have that courage when one is not the person >> making the releases :-) > > Hmm, shouldn't that process be mostly automated? And if not, maybe > it's worth thinking about how to do that. I guess from a functional > point of view a release is just a function that takes a revision and > has as its outputs installer images, binary installers, a new website, > yada yada yada.. IIUC The problem is that making a release involves a lot a build power that take long long time and makes it difficult to resolve unavoidable issues encountered during the process. I remember hearing Ludo explaining that the release process for Guix was more involving than for the other software projects he experienced. -- Mathieu Lirzin From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Chris Marusich Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.145568205825307 (code B ref 22687); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2016 04:07:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38750 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVtOr-0006a7-RO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:07:37 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:34860) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVtOp-0006Zs-O1 for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:07:36 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c10so3889793pfc.2 for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hQAA+Faw5cHrRHaryDJR6283zxIBI0LHOavambUTlLA=; b=Bxib44K9UKQBVgQ0rI5gea06TXtiAFR+TwtaENBX9hbxUbhoMeGOP46kmWT8hu4rca y+hy9e6DywgwiXPj/zP63ee17oQ3DvyMwRRZdfgbwDu9NzQ/eOuYom44VqVW2Y5NQNeg 0DCEwxRcN5NsQPJUE6Y0EausPGtJvBIwyuYMnRcwemzH8g7igO2Z8OMn47v55SNiRs0c Ym8mhIb3Bv/Fb21KPF62j4E67prPK/ftV0vM9vQadU5HwemcqNCrCYap4BNNHDuFi6pM I/e6pIzI8hVMiGdoQavu60imTYItfxubSx8B/KiPQniH3ytPV+z+TDD1J4Un2hLMM+xG IQkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hQAA+Faw5cHrRHaryDJR6283zxIBI0LHOavambUTlLA=; b=UhWZZKp3DvZmQ8LhGxoL4uVzb5ykg/lJko9OkyY6hdLMkddbv1smUV/GlMEstWkv7z +uRc7q4RK0oeW9Y5bja5Nhk+9boZ+451VKCW+HTkiddhuXqsHbliUa6MSYJkiqa/9HHB FzugHaTZ+KEYv5XbsTPngsJ5vuk6jzD7n3uqt5k4VSJXFfzi7l/4dsYflzUuDjv1HPiF lPKOj0GWCwsMat8O4X+2YBnrSytyf82uE3kJUWrDfM+ozE1Mft5qo2gLRVPL/iBuf9B9 iZzGe/PSgGNwhF3TvHVTKor21BoqXCiycwKqjD1AG+l9admkh7m7VTxmUUyChDI5h2at vbDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSH6gE4oIVUthyhjAR0nR0uT9qkJXWMa/A8OMVuchvpf1AKBru9KektfAGpcLQjFQ== X-Received: by 10.98.65.206 with SMTP id g75mr35847337pfd.94.1455682050095; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from garuda (c-73-169-163-30.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [73.169.163.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dz8sm49106531pab.19.2016.02.16.20.07.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:29 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Marusich References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:40 +0100") Message-ID: <878u2kx9mn.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and > development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we=E2= =80=99re > encouraging to do =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D (so users really run the de= velopment > version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an > up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest > release. Does guix pull not update the manual? - Chris From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Alex Kost Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chris Marusich Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.14557883462063 (code B ref 22687); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:40:01 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2016 09:39:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWL3C-0000XC-Jl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 04:39:06 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173]:33941) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWL3A-0000Wh-3q for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 04:39:04 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id of3so24865507lbc.1 for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:39:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Q26ejpg3AJ094f+HDW05KlGjOXP1vjmSsjSzRy14DM=; b=ZS3xD3tOWQss4GTm8T6DMhlYMsTvFsMaPERFxUIC4F7gCz0Sspyhic4omSqnqD+Slh 4hQO7XENjZ5pRZ4wYGUlfMX+A1a47aMtRFaiOalwxchmhwGSmAofiEboCGLujMfo4h1f mNtpR3e7vFeNReqcV7XQWonWzUbdPZog8+mOan3jvQ/uFcKTrQygz6WSZRc720l3A/X6 m5fZ+VOKHvMoqmXz3R4DiIjDX7J6Yljn7YYfvYboc6ob9H4ZCUbvz0qbhGzBVP8LBIEu J6BYFVI/xJxe4Q+JaNEHt4RXNNsSKv3UNJA2i8uB36l7Z1ryUnALwsA58iG/1wIdSz/T Rm8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Q26ejpg3AJ094f+HDW05KlGjOXP1vjmSsjSzRy14DM=; b=dCNF9ayrR/hB7tlYcV16FR/jnIZGmfchhjSwpCeCSgWLNK+USsCmua6SX8ei3K2oy6 G94mHDimPn1m63X4qKbqyRjhOtmKtHl4TiZ0LmJFUhEOunNeWTuFZe6CLRkdjjkROap6 cvuRl0NYom+wID4/nGa0nZxaPeUnLQG8JZhB+2QxP8qpk5NGIDdLr6lv6MNAoOEZfDxX NMgS+HFSYEr+z6Jiyg3ZBuIuXIRSQ2estW5WVpW/TFED6Mrr0hv+Kl8cxQWS7hl9s1cw QzJYCDgH9jfbQXgTRo1qoDg4tniY1aycFSQLTkkAIPksiUHr7VB5rjGIDY5F3K8Q2pYw gfOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTJz02vZQGmAHRvtlicya35B+tQpvZz5fwFOJMMtydZCIzJpEsvLAqEicjozkjuwg== X-Received: by 10.112.136.136 with SMTP id qa8mr2672025lbb.51.1455788338246; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:38:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from leviafan ([217.107.192.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h198sm807243lfb.47.2016.02.18.01.38.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:38:53 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Kost References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <878u2kx9mn.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:38:55 +0300 In-Reply-To: <878u2kx9mn.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:28 -0800") Message-ID: <87twl62w9c.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Chris Marusich (2016-02-17 07:07 +0300) wrote: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and >> development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we=E2= =80=99re >> encouraging to do =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D (so users really run the d= evelopment >> version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an >> up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest >> release. > > Does guix pull not update the manual? No, currently it updates only the scheme code. --=20 Alex From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mathieu Lirzin Cc: Florian Paul Schmidt , 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.145609447830771 (code B ref 22687); Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:42:02 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2016 22:41:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgn-00080F-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgl-000801-Kb for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgd-0007IF-EY for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:10 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgd-0007IB-BF; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:07 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:52110 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgc-00054o-G6; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:06 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> <56C3590B.7060701@gmx.net> <8737sss86a.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:41:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8737sss86a.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:37:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87twl1r8jj.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Mathieu Lirzin skribis: > Florian Paul Schmidt writes: > >> On 16.02.2016 17:42, Andreas Enge wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>>> I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound >>>> like a good idea. >>>=20 >>> It is easy enough to have that courage when one is not the person >>> making the releases :-) >> >> Hmm, shouldn't that process be mostly automated? And if not, maybe >> it's worth thinking about how to do that. I guess from a functional >> point of view a release is just a function that takes a revision and >> has as its outputs installer images, binary installers, a new website, >> yada yada yada.. > > IIUC The problem is that making a release involves a lot a build power > that take long long time and makes it difficult to resolve unavoidable > issues encountered during the process. > > I remember hearing Ludo explaining that the release process for Guix was > more involving than for the other software projects he experienced. Yeah it typically takes a lot of time waiting for builds and uploads to complete. See =E2=80=98release.org=E2=80=99 in guix-maintenance.git for a = feel. If people have ideas on how to improve the process, I=E2=80=99m all ears! = :-) Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.145609462230978 (code B ref 22687); Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:44:01 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2016 22:43:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36661 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcj8-00083Z-8p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49968) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcj6-00083M-Lk for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXciy-0007nG-EQ for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:35 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXciy-0007nB-Al; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:32 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:52112 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aXciv-0005Dp-5b; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:30 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:43:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:40 +0100") Message-ID: <87povpr8fl.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and > development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we=E2= =80=99re > encouraging to do =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D (so users really run the de= velopment > version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an > up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest > release. Yeah, sounds like we should do that, probably by setting up a cron job on one of the machines. I=E2=80=99ll see what can be done if nobody beats me at it. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 03 16:23:58 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2016 20:23:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axgrO-0000vI-FT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51751) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axgrN-0000v4-4P for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axgr2-0005YE-6o for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:48 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axgr2-0005WY-3j for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:36 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:54466 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1axgqx-000314-5A for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 22:23:28 +0200 Message-Id: <87a8k6ki0v.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #22687 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) severity 22687 wishlist From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> In-Reply-To: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> Resent-From: Julien Lepiller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.154504393423875 (code B ref 22687); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:53:02 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2018 10:52:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50878 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYqVS-0006D0-DW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 05:52:14 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:45606) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYqVP-0006Cp-AN for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 05:52:12 -0500 Received: from webmail.lepiller.eu (static-176-182-42-79.ncc.abo.bbox.fr [176.182.42.79]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6f998f2c (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:49:07 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:52:06 +0100 From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <93276949fe08769ec3ea3c84608f65d0@lepiller.eu> X-Sender: julien@lepiller.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Following swedebugia's example, I suggest we close this bug, since we now have https://guix.info/manual/{de,en,fr} should we advertise that version better from the main website at gnu.org? From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.154504613727770 (code B ref 22687); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:29:02 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2018 11:28:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYr4y-0007Dq-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:28:56 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o53.zoho.com ([135.84.80.218]:21743) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYr4w-0007Dh-Vb for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:28:55 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1545046126; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=mykefvDtb5Ugx5Kr+BL087+WRNj0oPstAV9hG0geHsVlTsEiG4YJM2rHgyoSWMdJjtH9h19Yvx+DcNK2m1gbOd0t0CjJZFQXH+1PcBzrxWmfAKKuyrfTBCMwGpovhSwXK2WTGuEYaIwzGX1WBRRTpUVsozfKMg4i2VC45UWdoPw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1545046126; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=M+Daw/WO12t6hf29caHHWfBrUKqv8MsIyC7l5bW6Osk=; b=fkb9ul7BPqnZTKnVSoQgWN3Ia6FCK23DulEkUWMH9rHWoLjOL+4l27Oe6DOBthdr+aW5GWEdyHekpAYYAiblHIvGZeYJnfUUGxK04v56pPYtrWS0VaPW7V1zqp4idiMg3EzZYXdu0phXyxiWth6jKoO1SyMVcNTJV5WjXwZv2Jo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1545046126; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=468; bh=M+Daw/WO12t6hf29caHHWfBrUKqv8MsIyC7l5bW6Osk=; b=K+vqMiWGfwamyesr9LmJgEHj4/xiv+me17n2U87Fu0zlEareosgCa3qXAJ2m6fgA ZrJBG3KeoEE7BE3507EbqSnYuqavSLZwkRbRlA/Agz+h6KOHJC5ABFHsPAN/ysq2JPE gl9Jab9kSP+39oAhCBDsP+7b8GGZ6cfKjN/cniIE= Received: from localhost (141.80.247.176 [141.80.247.176]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1545046125120143.56507235128618; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 03:28:45 -0800 (PST) References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <93276949fe08769ec3ea3c84608f65d0@lepiller.eu> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <93276949fe08769ec3ea3c84608f65d0@lepiller.eu> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:28:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87y38ov1cm.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Julien Lepiller writes: > Following swedebugia's example, I suggest we close this bug, since we > now have https://guix.info/manual/{de,en,fr} > > should we advertise that version better from the main website at > gnu.org? I=E2=80=99d prefer not to advertise guix.info just yet. If we get the guix.gnu.org subdomain (+ DNS delegation) set up without problems then we might just let guix.info disappear into the void. -- Ricardo From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> In-Reply-To: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> Resent-From: Julien Lepiller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22687 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22687.156458713210582 (code B ref 22687); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2019 15:32:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsqaJ-0002ka-KY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:32:11 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:35650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsqaG-0002kO-Jl for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:32:10 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8473dfbd for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:32:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to :from:message-id; s=dkim; bh=vXKwAaSlbdArKSilQs0RdGt0YJE=; b=Sfa Y8JAZElrYPW3LBHJGJ9NDjkqMbCcE2g3DY7biL2ssZC0XFc/JlswsYYIv4Jzcx6l /AT3Kd2tslyvAkdbTehHlaquU4oztzYkp8aROSy8wE2VUnoNki5YCt6yzUE3PGTw nxgyEw37ofa0Cf9AvPPpfYRj8g+qEgnI9NAJt0+6/i/KLtssdv7cx/cYMcA9u5kW PWc654CrSEf7BmF6ltpGXBkmdS8vY8c+MFR4I7Wy5HEIcWQSPwS7vW5k43YqHC4e OWA2PyLjALa/YvTArQUIJwNTgVQPWXyuRnn4SI8FFp/ipRTaG+DGOQGAWWl6xN1g aX5auU6uCsn/TxzxkvQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to :from:message-id; q=dns; s=dkim; b=PmRfX4xsq8yVQbBkVvW6RTXRp8TZc qWkqgxj0Rst6BhthyUXmx8L2MvEMHcEPn5bIYzxuxU7+RbRrqQG75JnHs+i727fF K21/UwjgiNd8FlNksvbSlEg3DKH1RHePSX8GxWlVpuNZIKgn2q0frWA2VVUnnKNT VXFO6HE3rNtgjOlr8VXIFG13g9gQKe9gUNhkM6ttQD+SaYdw4KXbWfjgMxwHTM2E NEJaKyhdAeQQAjgTscmCzoF2C8eZAu76oAa/fky2PwopKPwmRH5Lcpw5SU8sZRuX 66o7aBpLgrxvQkIf5oEK6Rax2MXvvVSJpkX3bUn9YV/5UaKBv5/eJT0AQ== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0e00cd35 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:31:59 +0200 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <45DEDA2C-0375-4406-84A1-C28C4E6945BE@lepiller.eu> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) We now have guix=2Egnu=2Eorg/manual and /manual/devel, which I think implem= ents this issue=2E Should we close it now? From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:54 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#22687: closed (Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically) Message-ID: References: <20190731174601.GA1225@jasmine.lan> <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 22687 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:47:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1564595222-25188-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1564595222-25188-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #22687: Online manual not updated automatically which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 22687@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 22687: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D22687 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1564595222-25188-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 22687-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2019 17:46:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hssg0-0006Wf-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:12 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:48277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hssfx-0006WM-Qq for 22687-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:10 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E39E21FB6; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=0vssSB2wakJurJf8VZz/wLJW TXqTqLgodPvqNu9E3HI=; b=T8Y872a9l6Rv58dMdGOyEb/VtPuDMH7xxjVa18+H HuCbmM3YqiyMwvWpOFOVBDmqUVCBIg5dRCkT2xSvoam9Q0+O57j/n0uhe8qJB6rM byEi4RCgrtLT5d0Rx1ZucujPCYn+ftlgHBmlI2VyOz5pOCnY8LWXb6eRuTMGJ367 52A= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=0vssSB 2wakJurJf8VZz/wLJWTXqTqLgodPvqNu9E3HI=; b=I/LW5LROXLZYMTyDqWDSHC VN59j2O0tV8KoAC9wmPIsLwrw0VufKEhit8n6I1tnu/Lacx/8XRiqywuacr/3iV+ 0xBqd66SCLuV77R+drX6R0O+lVBw5L9YTt6AHLg2POILiWglnJxvChNbx/ehx+Zu f9/FVA0WFJaRuIRdRfFh+ZcV+xbJBMuccxUXA7gObttQznM/66NSHLT4C70CS5WL rLA7XRfEN+oD7MdeSgCcE31T43lQ/jxTY9sRm0tIM4BFuq0keQgD4wZXq+Onrx4T wKRhWhpuDERCLnMfFcGohImmxcmDD0C+gjmi4RSpZZe3dpwyNg2UX87EJ5rYzp4A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrleehgdduudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppeejiedruddvgedrudefkedrieefnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 148E480059; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:01 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Message-ID: <20190731174601.GA1225@jasmine.lan> References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <45DEDA2C-0375-4406-84A1-C28C4E6945BE@lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45DEDA2C-0375-4406-84A1-C28C4E6945BE@lepiller.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687-done Cc: 22687-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 05:31:59PM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote: > We now have guix.gnu.org/manual and /manual/devel, which I think implements this issue. Should we close it now? Yes :) Thanks for the reminder ------------=_1564595222-25188-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2016 21:50:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2Q-0004cZ-Fm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47327) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2O-0004cN-1C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2H-0002lG-Tu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:26 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2H-0002lC-QF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2G-0002aQ-Nl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2D-0002l1-GO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:24 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:40333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2D-0002kp-AN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:21 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951AF20A84; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=k61eciUru1x2hxPZ9LAwj6571WY =; b=T/DzdvGuQbys6UbjbMyQE9m/J2gEE1ZBVey6oGoWrNDIt7W9+Daj+vMzxiY FGcGAwV51Mj+u/2HJNGsgWac4M4LQiO+vjiThcaFQQN+1k7NqVDruARVc5MfwLKZ 3GlkQW1CU+Ux20dMunP4fGEBa77blibiX0L9I9bUKv+ABvGQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=k6 1eciUru1x2hxPZ9LAwj6571WY=; b=IBrrsgNL7zkdtCaL4kpyP+GOqeHe4mj0lh hUoLbp89lWLul9gV4ZYPW+bxLBAiEk164c1PsiVvxtRHL2It9adqQrUdaUSkzt91 vEatilm2RYAL8f55mlctkbsDneQ+Skmlq4qP96ObMosKrIHI0j3Adv6A5LWF5Wc8 l5inepMvU= X-Sasl-enc: 8+8bcFRrbxc8B57vtC6xWISc6z46fG5WcNo3fFzYhnht 1455573018 Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3B4FE68012F for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:24 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Online manual not updated automatically Message-ID: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) ----- Forwarded message from carl hansen ----- http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/ works. BUT it says: "last updated November 04, 2015" So cronjob on gnu.org that updates to the lastest version is not working. Might be the answer to the problem about , too. ----- End forwarded message ----- I see the value of the online manual matching the version of the Guix binaries we distribute, but on the other hand, we get a lot of questions that are answered in the latest version of the manual. Thoughts? ------------=_1564595222-25188-1--