From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 15 16:50:34 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2016 21:50:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2Q-0004cZ-Fm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47327) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2O-0004cN-1C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2H-0002lG-Tu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:26 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2H-0002lC-QF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2G-0002aQ-Nl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2D-0002l1-GO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:24 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:40333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVR2D-0002kp-AN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:21 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951AF20A84; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=k61eciUru1x2hxPZ9LAwj6571WY =; b=T/DzdvGuQbys6UbjbMyQE9m/J2gEE1ZBVey6oGoWrNDIt7W9+Daj+vMzxiY FGcGAwV51Mj+u/2HJNGsgWac4M4LQiO+vjiThcaFQQN+1k7NqVDruARVc5MfwLKZ 3GlkQW1CU+Ux20dMunP4fGEBa77blibiX0L9I9bUKv+ABvGQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=k6 1eciUru1x2hxPZ9LAwj6571WY=; b=IBrrsgNL7zkdtCaL4kpyP+GOqeHe4mj0lh hUoLbp89lWLul9gV4ZYPW+bxLBAiEk164c1PsiVvxtRHL2It9adqQrUdaUSkzt91 vEatilm2RYAL8f55mlctkbsDneQ+Skmlq4qP96ObMosKrIHI0j3Adv6A5LWF5Wc8 l5inepMvU= X-Sasl-enc: 8+8bcFRrbxc8B57vtC6xWISc6z46fG5WcNo3fFzYhnht 1455573018 Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3B4FE68012F for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:50:24 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Online manual not updated automatically Message-ID: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) ----- Forwarded message from carl hansen ----- http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/ works. BUT it says: "last updated November 04, 2015" So cronjob on gnu.org that updates to the lastest version is not working. Might be the answer to the problem about , too. ----- End forwarded message ----- I see the value of the online manual matching the version of the Guix binaries we distribute, but on the other hand, we get a lot of questions that are answered in the latest version of the manual. Thoughts? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 15 17:49:25 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2016 22:49:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVRxN-00061o-Hz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:49:25 -0500 Received: from mail-yk0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]:32949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVRxL-00061b-D6 for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:49:23 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z13so66019763ykd.0 for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:49:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=worcester-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z7n7OPH/MzDHzdrOQn5FDoxf0tB0IJ0ey1O8HcwHSHY=; b=GOiec4eE3oJgG5vjB/ZYMylPWP7Pc6UAOPV3QQ9lPx7eeIkc4OFnx1nLDB/KsRq8wW l4htH6A0MQ+s/C+0jhZIMM11NV0Anurt41Bnmtco0rUMvetYkFDYWCLj65rUux5Jinfs pse74/uXQBd+H8qDjoi9RqyUL5T4YbWOECn92Lt5k33ce0v1mbkw6FqfaG6ERc3m3uju UpNo3aQUqVQBwjx6d5ykLz1hBfvOVxXXKPOl9M/KcnDu2tGasjcwa87klvTpBe5oXcg6 mF1/dKwdPG9sL7WT+2EQQNqjaRjE7SJvxkkdiu777F1hahfDx7ILX/qWmhXIpNaNT7uf T82Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=z7n7OPH/MzDHzdrOQn5FDoxf0tB0IJ0ey1O8HcwHSHY=; b=CHMiCsy4qsP70apNfiwSLQVtLq0pWv/hUn8qAow6pF61ggOFmzBJ0ReEstqLn2XAMX V9HN7OjBsWHp7mepcHMh/0OoXSlVPE2DFnQRzAQ4M4J5ArYCKo2HT+YdDg3QdMr9yrUj F7tfr2RLywq4VFaMclNEvQIEQEugnBofD0b2N1/FIykLV6Ad+icsuvuih3cmf+WjG4N6 pSccXz2dDEnD8k1H5lpR/I8fdLM6g7m0vjjNJ2tRAbdCX3h1hqnYa0FvURR1HR3Hmy6n hAvX3XSwIrHIkQMqLHjiT684Fu2ymXRyh2gVXVg9revMZmEa9q1Y+TkJmCXfvvboDlK2 ijog== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORo9wBu6IOtxGqYUAXRqXK+XhHdNZI5FEj7/zGmcMT9hylyA+vBy/PNYpHXVxDFV1QEcvmxq3a0CwB+5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.42.5 with SMTP id q5mr10869038ybq.72.1455576557719; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:49:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.25.86 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:49:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:49:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically From: "Thompson, David" To: Leo Famulari Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Leo Famulari wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from carl hansen ----- > http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/ > works. > BUT > it says: > "last updated November 04, 2015" > So cronjob on gnu.org that updates to the lastest version is not working. > Might > be the answer to the problem about , too. > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > I see the value of the online manual matching the version of the Guix > binaries we distribute, but on the other hand, we get a lot of questions > that are answered in the latest version of the manual. > > Thoughts? IMO, this is a "wontfix", but let's see what everyone else thinks. - Dave From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 16 05:06:51 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 10:06:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40812 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVcWx-0006RF-5v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:06:51 -0500 Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.20]:54434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVcWv-0006R5-9U for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:06:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FA5380E1F; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mdc-berlin.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :message-id:date:date:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from :references:received:received:received; s=mdc; t=1455617201; x= 1457431602; bh=5hmBDLBaXJIh4PlN6EG7tft7g5uZz3rkNEK1lMniQR8=; b=d rQLK2l3CfFQTwiYqgaxmqSC66JSqh6chbcdgD8xuNCEPYuOmZO9fkHMfyXfJFx4o o3aR453Jg1EMWHLjCzMl4nNAaNsLtRIawzo5hFr3Vy3y5DLReKLijBos9ZF85760 5tRR72D7MDqQXXJ2+Yi8K2QAiD25liyHhhVJz20dGc= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mdc-berlin.de Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dBImuO-kwuPt; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (puck.citx.mdc-berlin.de [141.80.36.101]) by pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (141.80.180.135) by HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (141.80.180.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:40 +0100 References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically In-Reply-To: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:40 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [141.80.180.135] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.000.1202-22134.006 X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.779900-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Leo Famulari writes: > I see the value of the online manual matching the version of the Guix > binaries we distribute, but on the other hand, we get a lot of questions > that are answered in the latest version of the manual. Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we’re encouraging to do “guix pull” (so users really run the development version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest release. ~~ Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 16 11:25:18 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 16:25:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38248 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aViRC-00025q-L9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:25:18 -0500 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:13211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aViRA-00025b-EB for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:25:16 -0500 X-HalOne-Cookie: b891133f513618a218014a0b6abcf1e3ded8f82e X-HalOne-ID: d70bd9f9-d4c9-11e5-8bea-b8ca3afa9d73 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=enge.fr; s=20140924; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=2uJROsfdPEjL9p4M4cdNOYlxUUTc1d/MPemL85aHvPA=; b=d1r5aETo/g3gpyqqw2oJDltp21ZcKlMku8jo9GEC1piBKvM/UU+2whtWE1HF4j0Wcqdrfrg6am2P6 u3vPjuoXnZ/Hec2k6Ns+u1tIElNdoWBbkWIqM7OKyDFOJgbqlLl34Jk4x6ra3eZCGDTgUFqNMdKtW3 iDVrlWozv/KTu6A8= Received: from solar (unknown [92.89.73.211]) by smtpfilter1.public.one.com (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:25:04 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Message-ID: <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:40AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and > development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we’re > encouraging to do “guix pull” (so users really run the development > version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an > up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest > release. Or alternatively, release more often :-) I wonder whether we should not make a point release after each security update instead of encouraging people to use "guix pull" (but we would quickly arrive at 0.9.9 now, after which only 1.0.0 would be a reasonable option to keep numerical and lexicographical ordering consistent). Or a point-point release as 0.9.0.1 and so on. Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 16 11:33:51 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 16:33:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aViZT-0002Ic-Am for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:33:51 -0500 Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.20]:58049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aViZS-0002IT-2I for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:33:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24048381208; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mdc-berlin.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :message-id:date:date:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from :references:received:received:received; s=mdc; t=1455640422; x= 1457454823; bh=pmLy70HVgG50R+SPklCgK2FqzhzIuGkhyh2BY4NQ7SA=; b=N 4e7yZwxk4X5ARwwKJNzeEuU3Lu2iAXMFNxy36Q6/G1mnleKuyaxR3qe/10zg0zfb IpLF6enaOkjBJFadFmebHsGQhsgT16zpn5rTVKjvgjju3lG4RcabuNb60nyu0fr0 dPXjrJVO0jIBPtwVuU8ALisb8pky4XCoIxN27lR+4M= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mdc-berlin.de Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iFA8SO5tLkgT; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (puck.citx.mdc-berlin.de [141.80.36.101]) by pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (141.80.180.135) by HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (141.80.180.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:27 +0100 References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically In-Reply-To: <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:33:27 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [141.80.180.135] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.000.1202-22136.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.064800-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Andreas Enge writes: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:40AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and >> development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we’re >> encouraging to do “guix pull” (so users really run the development >> version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an >> up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest >> release. > > Or alternatively, release more often :-) I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound like a good idea. > I wonder whether we should not make a point release after each security > update instead of encouraging people to use "guix pull" (but we would > quickly arrive at 0.9.9 now, after which only 1.0.0 would be a reasonable > option to keep numerical and lexicographical ordering consistent). > Or a point-point release as 0.9.0.1 and so on. I would like that. We could make patch releases for each time we merge core-updates / security-fixes into master. ~~ Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 16 11:42:29 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 16:42:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38265 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVihp-0002Vn-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:42:29 -0500 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:36175) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVihn-0002Va-SH for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:42:28 -0500 X-HalOne-Cookie: 11204b8ddb8d6591dbe3f8f4be2aba26681abbf1 X-HalOne-ID: 3f42b92a-d4cc-11e5-882a-b82a72cffc46 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=enge.fr; s=20140924; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to: references; bh=P9IycgZ7XtVjcbo2klO0dmKhlLFARQMLo8RSIZuZEhw=; b=ls1VhKZyaWlHLL8kI315dJ/VRGrtLOieqWzSwlLVqv2F53RCuK8nnwvPf+VEnNjQ10n9o7jhwM0DT eU1n2qYtFF6yzgOx+LqzXbEcCLaD2qXrRP0+h1pqSAAJncjE4Ie+40MlAM0payonLmeIjFHzlUp9O7 Sx5NhvK042CqubAA= Received: from solar (unknown [92.89.73.211]) by smtpfilter4.public.one.com (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:42:18 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Message-ID: <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound like a > good idea. It is easy enough to have that courage when one is not the person making the releases :-) Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 16 12:15:13 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 17:15:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDU-0004wO-PO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38128) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDS-0004vv-OQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDM-00018k-8D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:05 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:55413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDM-00018g-4h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDI-0002Dj-0p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDD-00016g-1H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:14:59 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:61939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVjDC-00016R-Os for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:14:54 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.241] ([77.8.85.57]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLS74-1aVBFP0mgM-000ZBU for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:14:53 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically To: bug-guix@gnu.org References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> From: Florian Paul Schmidt Message-ID: <56C3590B.7060701@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:14:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:BiDt9VpEJ8M9889J620RxcCs4TPQ/uAkRiDbuPX3Fx2eZUUssvx W1hfGebbgQXtorsE5f9NMZf3Y9miahQtSPD0XJnnSMJGo5K2tB4nRwVzF9dXLfcfa+KxZ5j 2Ccdv7Dkbd+Z5itVuFfgNT2OGb8gh385nmNqwKlcLQtWUErjKKzujqQ/qBQLCo7TA/Wpcj5 3vAvXPMJi7Geaw6tNKEgA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:WTraK+2SqRU=:s8o2s0pSof8FtPWGgYKV+O nl9ToAN+OF1aIPm5b/RS51HwLIH/EjeyOkc6kUWcFCVCeCH7Scg4TpWHrBOWkx4CMd3Yd9mIc YWlIwg+mwGis+pAnV9iGikkQ6lyLWQ5OjVqMhgjz6lu1uZFRWDArvi2q81GR7PpahYBmKEjP8 eWJA00F/IVOTqZGyQkX/UE49ILSjtLG1vQXk+o4AOXhQqteMsRFdnuLKrRnPaZx73YrZQGU2E ccVlxxolAOA9hJ3D0JxXtLjPy3JpgUOGs3nK/MCf8hef4RDy5PjLFXxVj1HlRdfX2ydn1rKDw 3Tmo/CpOycAzYB1OG/DKowpP+1nzD30248cosOms2YKwXrhwdihyuIpnCOhwTAsIlrPjayctr hapxNn5FilQAxvdNx345OAL8x171yIY8tjxmStHTtjOTNLzOEbZoRsQ8GjQ5lSbrUBr9U6BDa XmhJASxWdO0fehcPc36NhxatFpSF1COz4Eos9cSvWDsgOj2uyZJNOxBqsWvARw8U/kUv3pkxb /+fTMn1mLk74Go54gEN2iVjc/FTbkUDO6dSQHCX5Ax9QoXh3XiwZQAib8d8nWleUikhObcyXN NGzo+jgjfYWDewnIdK4MTpeqDmKPJFabmyJSpZBA5bSKrUU67FgSAsDmpEc9ZAi4QZa0kfkpL Rwljm/qfiOCKPyTb8o2sC0Waz5bE0EnSD7B/kNJD2cM2pe8FUl7Cj4OOFKnJoY4zeapbyU/y3 J0IFQUsZ12n0Qx+sJNip2n+HieaZxszRxnVlo+PT54oYAYIicd3DgSW5PciURRG/Vgi2HVFER 9z1CLBc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 16.02.2016 17:42, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound >> like a good idea. > > It is easy enough to have that courage when one is not the person > making the releases :-) Hmm, shouldn't that process be mostly automated? And if not, maybe it's worth thinking about how to do that. I guess from a functional point of view a release is just a function that takes a revision and has as its outputs installer images, binary installers, a new website, yada yada yada.. Regards, Flo - -- https://fps.io -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWw1kKAAoJEA5f4Coltk8Z/6sH/1CuqcAbB+RC/b4bmyBkSJ0z SlJBjkfs9BUxLtjzLXMn52t0dKOmA92CiVpZblTxb0M3rcruOY44Wlkc3J5PqP3U Aqh+YzrowqKHBi+iikftiJYj9X7beh7rWxmM48nWkdtPTfLUYdbi5+AJtz7bwvQ8 ZHx5wilEVaUnXKyiora3V2Nm8bjGQXIfncvQy7rrON2XaNZut8ruIAI0FSn8F4xD WPWP5tuTTdHJNCOSmsPr1kM2kmoBZ3hDs4BeJWbiTUMJTsh3G/P+z1XUBuoS3zWJ CwYrTwZzulq9JTP10JdMOEBcoZ9/za3cpiHM2n8rA1CEpVKRKM/s9tnKZjl+oZ8= =ODkW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 16 15:38:01 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 20:38:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNl-0004ce-8A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:38:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50420) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNj-0004cO-P3 for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:38:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNc-0003xi-1s for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:37:54 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNb-0003xb-Ug; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:37:51 -0500 Received: from mek33-4-82-236-46-88.fbx.proxad.net ([82.236.46.88]:58118 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aVmNb-0001JJ-Ef; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:37:51 -0500 From: Mathieu Lirzin To: Florian Paul Schmidt Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> <56C3590B.7060701@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:37:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <56C3590B.7060701@gmx.net> (Florian Paul Schmidt's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:14:51 +0100") Message-ID: <8737sss86a.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Florian Paul Schmidt writes: > On 16.02.2016 17:42, Andreas Enge wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>> I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound >>> like a good idea. >> >> It is easy enough to have that courage when one is not the person >> making the releases :-) > > Hmm, shouldn't that process be mostly automated? And if not, maybe > it's worth thinking about how to do that. I guess from a functional > point of view a release is just a function that takes a revision and > has as its outputs installer images, binary installers, a new website, > yada yada yada.. IIUC The problem is that making a release involves a lot a build power that take long long time and makes it difficult to resolve unavoidable issues encountered during the process. I remember hearing Ludo explaining that the release process for Guix was more involving than for the other software projects he experienced. -- Mathieu Lirzin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 16 23:07:38 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2016 04:07:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38750 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVtOr-0006a7-RO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:07:37 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:34860) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVtOp-0006Zs-O1 for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:07:36 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c10so3889793pfc.2 for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hQAA+Faw5cHrRHaryDJR6283zxIBI0LHOavambUTlLA=; b=Bxib44K9UKQBVgQ0rI5gea06TXtiAFR+TwtaENBX9hbxUbhoMeGOP46kmWT8hu4rca y+hy9e6DywgwiXPj/zP63ee17oQ3DvyMwRRZdfgbwDu9NzQ/eOuYom44VqVW2Y5NQNeg 0DCEwxRcN5NsQPJUE6Y0EausPGtJvBIwyuYMnRcwemzH8g7igO2Z8OMn47v55SNiRs0c Ym8mhIb3Bv/Fb21KPF62j4E67prPK/ftV0vM9vQadU5HwemcqNCrCYap4BNNHDuFi6pM I/e6pIzI8hVMiGdoQavu60imTYItfxubSx8B/KiPQniH3ytPV+z+TDD1J4Un2hLMM+xG IQkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hQAA+Faw5cHrRHaryDJR6283zxIBI0LHOavambUTlLA=; b=UhWZZKp3DvZmQ8LhGxoL4uVzb5ykg/lJko9OkyY6hdLMkddbv1smUV/GlMEstWkv7z +uRc7q4RK0oeW9Y5bja5Nhk+9boZ+451VKCW+HTkiddhuXqsHbliUa6MSYJkiqa/9HHB FzugHaTZ+KEYv5XbsTPngsJ5vuk6jzD7n3uqt5k4VSJXFfzi7l/4dsYflzUuDjv1HPiF lPKOj0GWCwsMat8O4X+2YBnrSytyf82uE3kJUWrDfM+ozE1Mft5qo2gLRVPL/iBuf9B9 iZzGe/PSgGNwhF3TvHVTKor21BoqXCiycwKqjD1AG+l9admkh7m7VTxmUUyChDI5h2at vbDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSH6gE4oIVUthyhjAR0nR0uT9qkJXWMa/A8OMVuchvpf1AKBru9KektfAGpcLQjFQ== X-Received: by 10.98.65.206 with SMTP id g75mr35847337pfd.94.1455682050095; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from garuda (c-73-169-163-30.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [73.169.163.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dz8sm49106531pab.19.2016.02.16.20.07.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:29 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Marusich To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:40 +0100") Message-ID: <878u2kx9mn.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and > development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we=E2= =80=99re > encouraging to do =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D (so users really run the de= velopment > version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an > up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest > release. Does guix pull not update the manual? - Chris From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 18 04:39:06 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2016 09:39:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWL3C-0000XC-Jl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 04:39:06 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173]:33941) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWL3A-0000Wh-3q for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 04:39:04 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id of3so24865507lbc.1 for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:39:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Q26ejpg3AJ094f+HDW05KlGjOXP1vjmSsjSzRy14DM=; b=ZS3xD3tOWQss4GTm8T6DMhlYMsTvFsMaPERFxUIC4F7gCz0Sspyhic4omSqnqD+Slh 4hQO7XENjZ5pRZ4wYGUlfMX+A1a47aMtRFaiOalwxchmhwGSmAofiEboCGLujMfo4h1f mNtpR3e7vFeNReqcV7XQWonWzUbdPZog8+mOan3jvQ/uFcKTrQygz6WSZRc720l3A/X6 m5fZ+VOKHvMoqmXz3R4DiIjDX7J6Yljn7YYfvYboc6ob9H4ZCUbvz0qbhGzBVP8LBIEu J6BYFVI/xJxe4Q+JaNEHt4RXNNsSKv3UNJA2i8uB36l7Z1ryUnALwsA58iG/1wIdSz/T Rm8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Q26ejpg3AJ094f+HDW05KlGjOXP1vjmSsjSzRy14DM=; b=dCNF9ayrR/hB7tlYcV16FR/jnIZGmfchhjSwpCeCSgWLNK+USsCmua6SX8ei3K2oy6 G94mHDimPn1m63X4qKbqyRjhOtmKtHl4TiZ0LmJFUhEOunNeWTuFZe6CLRkdjjkROap6 cvuRl0NYom+wID4/nGa0nZxaPeUnLQG8JZhB+2QxP8qpk5NGIDdLr6lv6MNAoOEZfDxX NMgS+HFSYEr+z6Jiyg3ZBuIuXIRSQ2estW5WVpW/TFED6Mrr0hv+Kl8cxQWS7hl9s1cw QzJYCDgH9jfbQXgTRo1qoDg4tniY1aycFSQLTkkAIPksiUHr7VB5rjGIDY5F3K8Q2pYw gfOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTJz02vZQGmAHRvtlicya35B+tQpvZz5fwFOJMMtydZCIzJpEsvLAqEicjozkjuwg== X-Received: by 10.112.136.136 with SMTP id qa8mr2672025lbb.51.1455788338246; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:38:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from leviafan ([217.107.192.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h198sm807243lfb.47.2016.02.18.01.38.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:38:53 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Kost To: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <878u2kx9mn.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:38:55 +0300 In-Reply-To: <878u2kx9mn.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:07:28 -0800") Message-ID: <87twl62w9c.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Chris Marusich (2016-02-17 07:07 +0300) wrote: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and >> development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we=E2= =80=99re >> encouraging to do =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D (so users really run the d= evelopment >> version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an >> up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest >> release. > > Does guix pull not update the manual? No, currently it updates only the scheme code. --=20 Alex From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 21 17:41:18 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2016 22:41:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgn-00080F-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgl-000801-Kb for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgd-0007IF-EY for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:10 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgd-0007IB-BF; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:07 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:52110 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcgc-00054o-G6; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:41:06 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <20160216162504.GC5914@solar> <20160216164218.GB5983@solar> <56C3590B.7060701@gmx.net> <8737sss86a.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:41:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8737sss86a.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:37:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87twl1r8jj.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: Florian Paul Schmidt , 22687@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Mathieu Lirzin skribis: > Florian Paul Schmidt writes: > >> On 16.02.2016 17:42, Andreas Enge wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:33:27PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>>> I was not courageous enough to suggest that, but this does sound >>>> like a good idea. >>>=20 >>> It is easy enough to have that courage when one is not the person >>> making the releases :-) >> >> Hmm, shouldn't that process be mostly automated? And if not, maybe >> it's worth thinking about how to do that. I guess from a functional >> point of view a release is just a function that takes a revision and >> has as its outputs installer images, binary installers, a new website, >> yada yada yada.. > > IIUC The problem is that making a release involves a lot a build power > that take long long time and makes it difficult to resolve unavoidable > issues encountered during the process. > > I remember hearing Ludo explaining that the release process for Guix was > more involving than for the other software projects he experienced. Yeah it typically takes a lot of time waiting for builds and uploads to complete. See =E2=80=98release.org=E2=80=99 in guix-maintenance.git for a = feel. If people have ideas on how to improve the process, I=E2=80=99m all ears! = :-) Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 21 17:43:42 2016 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2016 22:43:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36661 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcj8-00083Z-8p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49968) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXcj6-00083M-Lk for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXciy-0007nG-EQ for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:35 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXciy-0007nB-Al; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:32 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:52112 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aXciv-0005Dp-5b; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:43:30 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:43:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:06:40 +0100") Message-ID: <87povpr8fl.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and > development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we=E2= =80=99re > encouraging to do =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D (so users really run the de= velopment > version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an > up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest > release. Yeah, sounds like we should do that, probably by setting up a cron job on one of the machines. I=E2=80=99ll see what can be done if nobody beats me at it. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 03 16:23:58 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2016 20:23:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axgrO-0000vI-FT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51751) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axgrN-0000v4-4P for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axgr2-0005YE-6o for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:48 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axgr2-0005WY-3j for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:36 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:54466 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1axgqx-000314-5A for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 22:23:28 +0200 Message-Id: <87a8k6ki0v.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #22687 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) severity 22687 wishlist From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 17 05:52:14 2018 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2018 10:52:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50878 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYqVS-0006D0-DW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 05:52:14 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:45606) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYqVP-0006Cp-AN for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 05:52:12 -0500 Received: from webmail.lepiller.eu (static-176-182-42-79.ncc.abo.bbox.fr [176.182.42.79]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6f998f2c (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:49:07 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:52:06 +0100 From: Julien Lepiller To: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Message-ID: <93276949fe08769ec3ea3c84608f65d0@lepiller.eu> X-Sender: julien@lepiller.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Following swedebugia's example, I suggest we close this bug, since we now have https://guix.info/manual/{de,en,fr} should we advertise that version better from the main website at gnu.org? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 17 06:28:57 2018 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2018 11:28:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYr4y-0007Dq-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:28:56 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o53.zoho.com ([135.84.80.218]:21743) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYr4w-0007Dh-Vb for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:28:55 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1545046126; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=mykefvDtb5Ugx5Kr+BL087+WRNj0oPstAV9hG0geHsVlTsEiG4YJM2rHgyoSWMdJjtH9h19Yvx+DcNK2m1gbOd0t0CjJZFQXH+1PcBzrxWmfAKKuyrfTBCMwGpovhSwXK2WTGuEYaIwzGX1WBRRTpUVsozfKMg4i2VC45UWdoPw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1545046126; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=M+Daw/WO12t6hf29caHHWfBrUKqv8MsIyC7l5bW6Osk=; b=fkb9ul7BPqnZTKnVSoQgWN3Ia6FCK23DulEkUWMH9rHWoLjOL+4l27Oe6DOBthdr+aW5GWEdyHekpAYYAiblHIvGZeYJnfUUGxK04v56pPYtrWS0VaPW7V1zqp4idiMg3EzZYXdu0phXyxiWth6jKoO1SyMVcNTJV5WjXwZv2Jo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1545046126; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=468; bh=M+Daw/WO12t6hf29caHHWfBrUKqv8MsIyC7l5bW6Osk=; b=K+vqMiWGfwamyesr9LmJgEHj4/xiv+me17n2U87Fu0zlEareosgCa3qXAJ2m6fgA ZrJBG3KeoEE7BE3507EbqSnYuqavSLZwkRbRlA/Agz+h6KOHJC5ABFHsPAN/ysq2JPE gl9Jab9kSP+39oAhCBDsP+7b8GGZ6cfKjN/cniIE= Received: from localhost (141.80.247.176 [141.80.247.176]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1545046125120143.56507235128618; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 03:28:45 -0800 (PST) References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <93276949fe08769ec3ea3c84608f65d0@lepiller.eu> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically In-reply-to: <93276949fe08769ec3ea3c84608f65d0@lepiller.eu> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:28:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87y38ov1cm.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 Cc: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Julien Lepiller writes: > Following swedebugia's example, I suggest we close this bug, since we > now have https://guix.info/manual/{de,en,fr} > > should we advertise that version better from the main website at > gnu.org? I=E2=80=99d prefer not to advertise guix.info just yet. If we get the guix.gnu.org subdomain (+ DNS delegation) set up without problems then we might just let guix.info disappear into the void. -- Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 31 11:32:12 2019 Received: (at 22687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2019 15:32:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsqaJ-0002ka-KY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:32:11 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:35650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsqaG-0002kO-Jl for 22687@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:32:10 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8473dfbd for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:32:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to :from:message-id; s=dkim; bh=vXKwAaSlbdArKSilQs0RdGt0YJE=; b=Sfa Y8JAZElrYPW3LBHJGJ9NDjkqMbCcE2g3DY7biL2ssZC0XFc/JlswsYYIv4Jzcx6l /AT3Kd2tslyvAkdbTehHlaquU4oztzYkp8aROSy8wE2VUnoNki5YCt6yzUE3PGTw nxgyEw37ofa0Cf9AvPPpfYRj8g+qEgnI9NAJt0+6/i/KLtssdv7cx/cYMcA9u5kW PWc654CrSEf7BmF6ltpGXBkmdS8vY8c+MFR4I7Wy5HEIcWQSPwS7vW5k43YqHC4e OWA2PyLjALa/YvTArQUIJwNTgVQPWXyuRnn4SI8FFp/ipRTaG+DGOQGAWWl6xN1g aX5auU6uCsn/TxzxkvQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to :from:message-id; q=dns; s=dkim; b=PmRfX4xsq8yVQbBkVvW6RTXRp8TZc qWkqgxj0Rst6BhthyUXmx8L2MvEMHcEPn5bIYzxuxU7+RbRrqQG75JnHs+i727fF K21/UwjgiNd8FlNksvbSlEg3DKH1RHePSX8GxWlVpuNZIKgn2q0frWA2VVUnnKNT VXFO6HE3rNtgjOlr8VXIFG13g9gQKe9gUNhkM6ttQD+SaYdw4KXbWfjgMxwHTM2E NEJaKyhdAeQQAjgTscmCzoF2C8eZAu76oAa/fky2PwopKPwmRH5Lcpw5SU8sZRuX 66o7aBpLgrxvQkIf5oEK6Rax2MXvvVSJpkX3bUn9YV/5UaKBv5/eJT0AQ== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0e00cd35 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <22687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:31:59 +0200 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Online manual not updated automatically To: 22687@debbugs.gnu.org From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <45DEDA2C-0375-4406-84A1-C28C4E6945BE@lepiller.eu> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) We now have guix=2Egnu=2Eorg/manual and /manual/devel, which I think implem= ents this issue=2E Should we close it now? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 31 13:46:12 2019 Received: (at 22687-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2019 17:46:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hssg0-0006Wf-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:12 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:48277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hssfx-0006WM-Qq for 22687-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:10 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E39E21FB6; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=0vssSB2wakJurJf8VZz/wLJW TXqTqLgodPvqNu9E3HI=; b=T8Y872a9l6Rv58dMdGOyEb/VtPuDMH7xxjVa18+H HuCbmM3YqiyMwvWpOFOVBDmqUVCBIg5dRCkT2xSvoam9Q0+O57j/n0uhe8qJB6rM byEi4RCgrtLT5d0Rx1ZucujPCYn+ftlgHBmlI2VyOz5pOCnY8LWXb6eRuTMGJ367 52A= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=0vssSB 2wakJurJf8VZz/wLJWTXqTqLgodPvqNu9E3HI=; b=I/LW5LROXLZYMTyDqWDSHC VN59j2O0tV8KoAC9wmPIsLwrw0VufKEhit8n6I1tnu/Lacx/8XRiqywuacr/3iV+ 0xBqd66SCLuV77R+drX6R0O+lVBw5L9YTt6AHLg2POILiWglnJxvChNbx/ehx+Zu f9/FVA0WFJaRuIRdRfFh+ZcV+xbJBMuccxUXA7gObttQznM/66NSHLT4C70CS5WL rLA7XRfEN+oD7MdeSgCcE31T43lQ/jxTY9sRm0tIM4BFuq0keQgD4wZXq+Onrx4T wKRhWhpuDERCLnMfFcGohImmxcmDD0C+gjmi4RSpZZe3dpwyNg2UX87EJ5rYzp4A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrleehgdduudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppeejiedruddvgedrudefkedrieefnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 148E480059; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:46:01 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: bug#22687: Online manual not updated automatically Message-ID: <20190731174601.GA1225@jasmine.lan> References: <20160215215024.GA22646@jasmine> <45DEDA2C-0375-4406-84A1-C28C4E6945BE@lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45DEDA2C-0375-4406-84A1-C28C4E6945BE@lepiller.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22687-done Cc: 22687-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 05:31:59PM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote: > We now have guix.gnu.org/manual and /manual/devel, which I think implements this issue. Should we close it now? Yes :) Thanks for the reminder From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:34:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator