GNU bug report logs - #22629
Towards a new 'guix pull'

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:36:02 UTC

Severity: important

Merged with 28471

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #77 received at 22629 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen <at> fastmail.net>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#22629: [PATCH 0/4] 'guix pull' produces a self-contained Guix
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 13:45:31 +0200
Hi Ludo,

>> Just wondering: does this mean that I could substitute Guix from my local
>> source tree simply by doing
>>
>>    ./pre-inst-env guix package -p ~/.config/guix/current -i guix
>
> That would just install the snapshot that the ‘guix’ package refers to
> (it’s defined in (gnu packages package-management)).)

Fine, so if I run update-guix-package.scm and then do the install, I get
what I expect, right?

I am looking for a reasonably straightforward way to have everything in
my Guix universe (the guix command line tool, emacs-guix, guile, geiser,
...) consistently use my personal version of the package definitions.

> Now, installing Guix in your main profile is probably not a good idea.
> Since Guix it what allows you to manage the profile in question, it’s
> probably better to keep it separate.  That way, ‘guix’ is managed

Yes, that makes sense.

Konrad.




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 322 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.