From unknown Sun Jun 22 15:26:59 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22571: Guix on Debian Testing sbcl package needs warning to set SBCL_HOME Resent-From: Christopher W Carpenter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 05:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 22571 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22571@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145473745812398 (code B ref -1); Sat, 06 Feb 2016 05:45:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2016 05:44:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRvfO-0003Du-35 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:44:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32859) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRvfM-0003Dh-U8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:44:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRvfG-0000ly-PJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:44:11 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRvfG-0000lu-Lv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:44:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRvfF-0004Xp-Pb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:44:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRvfC-0000lb-JI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:44:09 -0500 Received: from mail.mordocai.net ([52.33.237.58]:42199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRvfC-0000kh-BP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:44:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mordocai.net; s=key; h=Subject:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:To:From; bh=+ChLQhjpxsVX31b1zRX7UIW/SKKTpY39SF0n/q0nCzk=; b=WEyQ1I0xLqux6nFwNw/AJEuoH8PSQ9IdMUtZt8eHe3w2IAQHIxKa1i463K7mkUUJM6TDahVTgSDVXIbdNWvpCHb9Dk1wyit8/1ghdjH+0qLqKUhvqUA1FUbRtm5yAKnikK62IJIcy6PkTU7Lbb5fJduXh2ZHQ+P86oURshotDSk=; Received: from 97-88-111-154.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com ([97.88.111.154] helo=mordocai-desktop) by mail.mordocai.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRvez-0002r4-3W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 05:43:53 +0000 From: Christopher W Carpenter Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 23:40:02 -0600 Message-ID: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam_score: -1.0 X-Spam_score_int: -9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.mordocai.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I talked with mark weaver about this on #guix and he asked me to send a mail. When doing guix package -i sbcl on my newly setup debian testing + guix machine and then attempting to run sbcl I got the error: [...] Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP No description available. X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.88.111.154 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mordocai@mordocai.net X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.mordocai.net) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I talked with mark weaver about this on #guix and he asked me to send a mail. When doing guix package -i sbcl on my newly setup debian testing + guix machine and then attempting to run sbcl I got the error: fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 7492(tid 140737354086144): can't find core file at /usr/lib64/sbcl/sbcl.core Exporting SBCL_HOME=$HOME/.guix-profile/lib/sbcl fixes this for me. The way this seems to be handled other places is by printing a message after the package install explaining that this may be needed. This seems like the appropriate thing to do to me. I'd love to submit a patch if someone can guide me through it, I just started seriously trying guix out today. Thanks, Christopher Carpenter P.S. Please make sure to CC me in replies, I have not joined the mailing list (yet). --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWtYgZAAoJEFJw6mniKuelMCkP/1zEw5B4QZBYL3OTaTaogOjj CT46p6QZne7RtaZCtac31aubI3XGerhWq1WiKTHFtBp7VGBUGjjgN/K4Rv5PfLYQ HotZ6PxhmMQyfbQTVXrz5RZx0fzY+sg7H/JMx9zcCcLLCormE3Taj5Uqa7uk74ri oKH+dhwvgp23YOcnmVs8ac3bm91ucp8Cnk1qovek1Ymk62laN5TLDY+g74YMBKDg YT3iJ4WzVWR36z7FVavJD+D/52fkhW7tL4JQ9koJgrUdLOvj/eBD90LM7xYl3jC2 Y1azXG9Ab7nYJ+82soEySmZoXZLmxzgcDJEsq0ygZ9yeX6+w1GUGg+dMl8WXBWa7 m+UScjJIg0PRdlNhIXNkPROz4HL7e4+76w/WJFdQ36nk7kcjtz53EFBks6R0vOYX jMT9t8HZE7iP4aZaq8hIEtrL6mTt2zqyDERBsbdbwaqKyFvsRRa+wb2s9Y3cStDR oEkMwYKQ2rFepl56WaZvIyW00hDvgspWbymGKHsRBYdnLkJjppTy6zB68pRF8RC3 eAI2/U0aMA7B9dlgBuVCd/csOhzPti3IZEzCoKuGKNVNLbVaPg4OCFL97+JcIQ5W tkEUiFNi2nbnZIezz1eOol9trAK2O1/zlKXYCwGpe24BfDwUSMLwGInC7oNybEKt 5LXffuBm0y1WBUBqqCra =iY0H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 15:26:59 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22571: Guix on Debian Testing sbcl package needs warning to set SBCL_HOME Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 08:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22571 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher W Carpenter Cc: 22571@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22571-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22571.14547485473036 (code B ref 22571); Sat, 06 Feb 2016 08:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 22571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2016 08:49:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35101 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRyYF-0000mt-Bu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 03:49:07 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:58476) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRyYD-0000ml-6I for 22571@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 03:49:05 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3F92028A; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 03:49:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 06 Feb 2016 03:49:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=grxeg aLsklnZcmuspVCN983cy3c=; b=C7FqGkCe7VMA8bUGGjQc1f1m97fRB9YG8hrM7 s5dASlDUQieze8wEbhfRe00bhzIeMT/hbDI9nEWxcID4743xkWbc8fUDQTyf/dVm MzrQeHyUi50SyUvMpwQcrtciAF8pJHJkIjZBNuOt9RJN2REfFfDSTZQQiz1IsgwF 58ykV8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=grxegaLsklnZcmuspVCN983cy3c=; b=LQ50M p3fy9R92Upp2+Fyxvl6WLC5yxVH4wXYqWK630EYzhBm/rxphsqNFDjG24fI6l/Wd vEJS8Xvp5FPu8aEkkAQOmVCYcET0FW9/LEuaHFE+AprxJN5JzP3vImDVaTMzCZqr VRmyUjf2cXxSvOCdCg9bQXqQT/AvODaj5WQH+w= X-Sasl-enc: PrpiAPf8CEfUvps03TL8lAM/RsihS7ZN5fD9tjkTTs1E 1454748544 Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 184BBC00016; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 03:49:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 03:49:03 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20160206084903.GF1432@jasmine> References: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:40:02PM -0600, Christopher W Carpenter wrote: > > I talked with mark weaver about this on #guix and he asked me to send a > mail. > > When doing guix package -i sbcl on my newly setup debian testing + guix > machine and then attempting to run sbcl I got the error: > > fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 7492(tid 140737354086144): > can't find core file at /usr/lib64/sbcl/sbcl.core > > Exporting SBCL_HOME=$HOME/.guix-profile/lib/sbcl fixes this for me. The > way this seems to be handled other places is by printing a message after > the package install explaining that this may be needed. There is a pretty good description of search-paths here: https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Invoking-guix-package Basically, you can list the environment variables needed by the package in the package definition. Then, users can view them or set them automatically. There are some examples in the package tree. > > This seems like the appropriate thing to do to me. I'd love to submit a > patch if someone can guide me through it, I just started seriously > trying guix out today. I hope this helps. Feel free to ask for more help! > > Thanks, > Christopher Carpenter > > P.S. Please make sure to CC me in replies, I have not joined the mailing > list (yet). From unknown Sun Jun 22 15:26:59 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22571: Guix on Debian Testing sbcl package needs warning to set SBCL_HOME Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 13:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22571 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher W Carpenter Cc: 22571@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22571-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22571.14547640303081 (code B ref 22571); Sat, 06 Feb 2016 13:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 22571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2016 13:07:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Zy-0000nd-5V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 08:07:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35839) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Zx-0000nP-JV for 22571@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 08:07:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Zo-0003VJ-FJ for 22571@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 08:07:04 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Zo-0003VE-Cx; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 08:07:00 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:35172 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Zn-0002fA-QF; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 08:07:00 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 18 =?UTF-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 14:06:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> (Christopher W. Carpenter's message of "Fri, 05 Feb 2016 23:40:02 -0600") Message-ID: <874mdm0yz2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) Christopher W Carpenter skribis: > When doing guix package -i sbcl on my newly setup debian testing + guix > machine and then attempting to run sbcl I got the error: > > fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 7492(tid 140737354086144): > can't find core file at /usr/lib64/sbcl/sbcl.core Are you sure you were running ~/.guix-profile/bin/sbcl? I=E2=80=99ve just tried this on GuixSD, to check whether sbcl systematically looks for things in /usr: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ strace -f -o ,,s $(guix build sbcl | head -1)/bin/sbcl=20 This is SBCL 1.2.8, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at . SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (+ 2 3) 5 * $ grep /usr ,,s [ nothing ] --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- However, it loads /etc/sbclrc. Could it be that your host distro provides such a file, which tweaks sbcl into reading from /usr/lib64? Thanks for the report, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 22 15:26:59 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22571: Acknowledgement (Guix on Debian Testing sbcl package needs warning to set SBCL_HOME) Resent-From: Christopher W Carpenter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 01:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22571 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22571@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22571-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22571.145506944627565 (code B ref 22571); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 01:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 22571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2016 01:57:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK21-0007AX-VW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:57:26 -0500 Received: from mail.mordocai.net ([52.33.237.58]:43951) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK20-0007AL-KC for 22571@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:57:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mordocai.net; s=key; h=Subject:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From; bh=7IdRGxEPrUG5oFfYyYfi2RFtXGI+gLN97PLvVJxLPrc=; b=klLs7nwNgN3WZdYOnOwdxCLbJJBbiAgpW/gL9rRx//dZhddanng2GVB0RC3+8J6FqvUW1HA0rtwM+FY0kU0f5OZ6DGeuBvlG6KlJfqM7qoNtrNrL3vRv+OnfJpG/pRQd6ejufz3f9kl+UHW5MkCq/Ij2ssDi4IE1jrRW5XAEv3Q=; Received: from 97-88-111-154.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com ([97.88.111.154] helo=mordocai-desktop) by mail.mordocai.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK1l-0000eG-Jr for 22571@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 01:57:09 +0000 From: Christopher W Carpenter References: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:57:11 -0600 In-Reply-To: (GNU bug Tracking System's message of "Sat, 06 Feb 2016 05:45:02 +0000") Message-ID: <878u2tpbt4.fsf@mordocai.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam_score: -1.0 X-Spam_score_int: -9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.mordocai.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I found the problem, and this can be closed IMHO. I use StumpWM, which is written in common lisp and I use sbcl to run it. It appears that when the stumpwm image is created the SBCL_HOME environment variable's state at that time is stored. In addition, for whatever reason, any processes started from stumpwm will have a SBCL_HOME environment variable with that same value. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP No description available. X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.88.111.154 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mordocai@mordocai.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.mordocai.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.mordocai.net) X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I found the problem, and this can be closed IMHO. I use StumpWM, which is written in common lisp and I use sbcl to run it. It appears that when the stumpwm image is created the SBCL_HOME environment variable's state at that time is stored. In addition, for whatever reason, any processes started from stumpwm will have a SBCL_HOME environment variable with that same value. Therefore, my issue was that my stumpwm that was starting my processes(and the processess themselves) had an old, incorrect value for SBCL_HOME which would then cause this error. Interesting "bug" to find! Thanks for the help! Christopher Carpenter --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWupj3AAoJEFJw6mniKuelQp4P/0ZazgFu9smWrUWEwoUZghXC 1CBbHRSOevS4BRlTt/IEPcWl93lEHcjmpmGfq20ynQMw1q1oL2yK1wydZ+7gWcHL sYiRLA2gt1k5ksuTCryT9wrtskTG6OSoLOq5gWj3eI7bC8QPyi2qt40RuHNcMxch RD152Ku1iFXjbZV8AL4H2AVvEwiQ7F5jgt55omYnqo3+KI82kdtkjodqb/LciSIj bFkQFDj0jsS0r19diyIQ1OQnX0FA7gVuYoa7cb3lXiLzxhRFj4BxF6sI7ckyYyID ZSyZkfX0xnPaljg9Fhm6h/DBuXJfNW0GwuA/iisOoLgPjqF/8GEPpAu6RLWkp8bc pqLDu61f30Rus8VassBnbkBDcw0x4zPvDQf09ClOBrcCDWI5v2sZIsgmFXIeaSBk g01NTcx729XrJqfVCgpuFbNrZtS6TuMVsk+uoGpfrPcZ0kQZ5nre0FnDYe5BEpS7 K3aoCnMYU61F2ifLHmrIXU6spal0cvu9SjPGA8S1Z9cPWgPPFOxJVGTLYEq0l7qJ ZoXQofX9PWMhdt4Q+VFmZTLTzKw6U5bfhLfEnE8CvLfi6iwvrF6Kw6NoTuYgOJ0Y EJSU5j8+LfqfWq61tjY42aBwe9rw/nxjAR0Gw89YXCkZyhFh1isXz/Fq3ZRhxVCV JpWP7ExGH9cg2bLPL684 =rsLZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 15:26:59 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22571: Acknowledgement (Guix on Debian Testing sbcl package needs warning to set SBCL_HOME) Resent-From: Alex Kost Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22571 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher W Carpenter Cc: 22571@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22571-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22571.145509962425752 (code B ref 22571); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 22571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2016 10:20:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34229 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTRsm-0006hI-3F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:20:24 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]:33936) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTRsj-0006h1-O3 for 22571@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:20:22 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j78so8672673lfb.1 for <22571@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:20:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=MndHIunoj+8ZBV8xPZ03CWpPCksUyBv5ARpT0utAjxg=; b=nQOrD0w7RUz20K2AfClZH1cHCkhgTznQCxYwzwwJmj62Fct/Tirs5DzfemzpNp01ix sCDgMgACqMHLGsb7qfqIIXiP0CLi31G7X0iFgdYs2K2y+jjPA7yXkAo/Z4xEpUbvdHwO adBVQyD5oX4LSg6iLAsq/ivL2uzFFObg+JiFoF8drkw6RvwtZjqwBAWJ8UOzSnjP2hYq s9uI5VXh69rXwKyGUSBggBgTVd/mxdy9H8BrKgRqfiDU50ksbZRXP2LlGsvqxa9Z/41G k7tAxMWqEEGSGBdFQxs8i9Zfqoq0PiQdTd6Ui5Dxd0c48I6szUus79ocwA12/jVCGIN+ RoWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=MndHIunoj+8ZBV8xPZ03CWpPCksUyBv5ARpT0utAjxg=; b=SZgQ1KvYAxllNWNbhjTlzqKF+UuJEXttGPG01OYU9zSjrmmJQFN69T/Xfm01ki/JV/ vxb6twe4Og4bXCAj0jwEdIRQWeQk7jd6xAUUdczehSPbPswKE6nWr/Rp1xAVKTgYy5dq uS6urvjToHE+I3OSzbKFu+EBuc4wiRMuMefkNGLRylUG6jrev8e5lF1JZBDqu3P4AwnW Be/aSUjrCD9JI0ebKZk1d2qsV2/lleo9YAJbgUC1l/I4Sz8Cw6Hw1MpJmnZb8es/oFyN Sdxy4rdBmp7C8klYjIgPAfz7T3qGtJtNaU1SS5F1S3UwpEpQNnKCT7hV9i2z7u9ibZC0 6htA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTTr5pol0OItC19k62KIp7E+njSUGhmob/RneIobKAKVrPr9zFcnJAHkmYUHmkBRg== X-Received: by 10.25.145.14 with SMTP id t14mr17096721lfd.100.1455099616052; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:20:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from leviafan ([217.107.192.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p138sm343282lfb.22.2016.02.10.02.20.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:20:15 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Kost References: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> <878u2tpbt4.fsf@mordocai.net> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:20:16 +0300 In-Reply-To: <878u2tpbt4.fsf@mordocai.net> (Christopher W. Carpenter's message of "Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:57:11 -0600") Message-ID: <87h9hg6f4v.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Christopher W Carpenter (2016-02-10 04:57 +0300) wrote: > I found the problem, and this can be closed IMHO. > > I use StumpWM, which is written in common lisp and I use sbcl to run it. > It appears that when the stumpwm image is created the SBCL_HOME > environment variable's state at that time is stored. In addition, for > whatever reason, any processes started from stumpwm will have a > SBCL_HOME environment variable with that same value. > > Therefore, my issue was that my stumpwm that was starting my > processes(and the processess themselves) > had an old, incorrect value for SBCL_HOME which would then cause this > error. Oh, cool, I also use stumpwm but I've never noticed it because I compile stumpwm using sbcl from Guix, so my value of SBCL_HOME is: "/gnu/store/qkrqqb81hs6nypvzbgi8ixrrza78gvlb-sbcl-1.2.8/lib/sbcl" > Interesting "bug" to find! Thanks for the help! Thanks for discovering it! It's good to know this thing (just in case). -- Alex From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 10 05:24:06 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2016 10:24:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34233 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTRwM-0006nL-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:24:06 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176]:36649) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTRwK-0006ms-NY for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:24:04 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id uq3so4518803lbc.3 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:24:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=SKhancuDoKPje2Sn8NW4Rn4QOLQh/ZknsJTIcdYeIV4=; b=FtLpJxUPdR/9G8IpsRKvp0bqx/Xm1jlUVTj9A0Zr7ZtaIedUZ+YMtoToavW0nVkD+w 3XkjaT8In+WcrPKrabyayXF5aXMkNG+oFBYeXHE/gpVDdEpBWjL4AG5Po+xmEKWpH7Gd +bbr19j5FCR250uDUdwTKQ5xwTUENpzK3+ZE7pgqGnM86FUxv7CLBM0+oSlmbEbM+clW vABTSjhH4Mk5SChJEN10SNUMheD3VNNmoHB4keyZ4fkOjJdDfJ8XdP0B7AhIS/3QTtPP 8MvUcl5HFp/T6jzGlGEAkEPLMlR3R/v6AzJ9s82l+g5uBk8xlmXDuQ+yXBeQAEipEqM8 s0EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=SKhancuDoKPje2Sn8NW4Rn4QOLQh/ZknsJTIcdYeIV4=; b=HEbFhrzOr+jZSesmSUkTsx+POv5RVAwuDD21ENTn50+kBHvQWfmO285o36hhSFHrHK wuvD+PRM2T0QQRJbjbTpfq5gHpkd8i4TrmAUCtTlDjKqee8rXa7Bm6w9MsXIGPtkvDyh vBIf26AA6byXNEIR/B0o/dSNnl3s7N8ClBeynkZ5Qs5ghXBNekmVebwkhfhPJ4eVf4jn x4+/ZMSsOTqVztSZ5eD25NHLp6e5CPke47FhQue60YU2xYiJaMRHtnbIZo89CmlCYQf9 7GXs4bYpLd1jdWpe0Rmnp7lexzSiMFwxfCLXO1k/c9LHeDpkZ4eTXSBk2b2IV5Zf/cIQ hVxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT6DsF9rJYZigpmLA1zIdknWF6wBO4fbpEDOGLrMRrC8IBe9ug1FsHNFQXSmLskcg== X-Received: by 10.112.213.70 with SMTP id nq6mr12160607lbc.8.1455099839099; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:23:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from leviafan ([217.107.192.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a5sm277740lbo.6.2016.02.10.02.23.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:23:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:23:59 +0300 Message-Id: <87fux06eyo.fsf@gmail.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Alex Kost Subject: control message for bug #22571 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) tags 22571 fixed close 22571 24.5 From unknown Sun Jun 22 15:26:59 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22571: Acknowledgement (Guix on Debian Testing sbcl package needs warning to set SBCL_HOME) Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22571 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed To: Christopher W Carpenter Cc: 22571-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22571-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D22571.145513994316912 (code D ref 22571); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 22571-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2016 21:32:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35402 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTcN5-0004Oi-IO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:32:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58418) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTcN4-0004OW-1Q for 22571-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:32:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTcMt-0000Ax-NB for 22571-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:32:16 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTcMt-0000Am-Jo; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:32:11 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:59408 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aTcMs-0000bl-6h; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:32:11 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> <878u2tpbt4.fsf@mordocai.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 22 =?UTF-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:32:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878u2tpbt4.fsf@mordocai.net> (Christopher W. Carpenter's message of "Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:57:11 -0600") Message-ID: <87d1s4i754.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) Christopher W Carpenter skribis: > I found the problem, and this can be closed IMHO. > > I use StumpWM, which is written in common lisp and I use sbcl to run it. > It appears that when the stumpwm image is created the SBCL_HOME > environment variable's state at that time is stored. In addition, for > whatever reason, any processes started from stumpwm will have a > SBCL_HOME environment variable with that same value. > > Therefore, my issue was that my stumpwm that was starting my > processes(and the processess themselves) > had an old, incorrect value for SBCL_HOME which would then cause this > error. > > Interesting "bug" to find! Thanks for the help! Indeed, thanks for letting us know! Ludo=E2=80=99.