GNU bug report logs - #22564
Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #47 received at 22564 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
To: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza <at> udel.edu>
Cc: 22564 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough.
Date: 6 Feb 2016 11:21:10 -0000

Hello, Mark.

In article <mailman.3712.1454686507.843.bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> you wrote:

> Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de> writes:
>>> No, it's a deliberate feature, AFAIU.

>> You mean, there should no longer be a vanilla fundamental mode?  I would
>> argue that no "helpful" electric modes should be enabled in FM.  At the
>> moment, it appears, we are lacking a What-You-Do-Is-What-You-Get mode.

>> I think electric-*-modes should be disabled in FM unless explicitly
>> enabled by the user in an FM buffer.  We've become far too "clever" with
>> all these facilities.

> electric-indent-mode is the only electric-*-mode on by default, and I
> never understood why it was enabled. Up until bracketed paste was
> implemented, this issue of indenting pastes had been an annoyance (only
> later on did I realize to disable this electric mode).

What is "bracketed paste"?  The term appears only in xterm.el, but that
file doesn't say what it is.

I still think it's a bug that a standard OS paste operation doesn't work
out of the box in a non-specialised buffer.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.