GNU bug report logs - #22534
File notify broken on Windows

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Fabrice Popineau <fabrice.popineau <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:25:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 22534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, fabrice.popineau <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#22534: File notify broken on Windows
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:03:13 +0200
> From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
> Cc: fabrice.popineau <at> gmail.com,  22534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:51:09 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Expensive checks are skipped only for "make check" and "make
> >> check-maybe". "make file-notify-tests" run all possible tests in
> >> that file.
> >
> > That's inconsistent, won't you agree?
> 
> No. If you want to run the tests of a given file, you don't want to
> discriminate them. Otherwise, you could run expensive tests in that file
> only when you call "make check-expensive". Not acceptable, IMO.

That's your logic, not mine.  If I want all the tests, I will say so.

> >> The syntax of selectors is given by ert. See (info "(ert) Test Selectors")
> >
> > I understood the syntax by looking at what Makefile does.  But it's
> > hardly convenient (or pretty) to type Lisp expressions on the Make
> > command line, IMO.
> 
> What would you recommend else? Introduce another syntax for selectors?

Something like "make file-notify-tests TEST=06", for example.




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 115 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.