GNU bug report logs - #22509
[guile-2.1.1 alpha] make check FAIL & crirical warnings on Solaris10 x86/64

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Kiyoshi KANAZAWA <yoi_no_myoujou <at> yahoo.co.jp>

Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:52:02 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 22509 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#22509; Package guile. (Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Kiyoshi KANAZAWA <yoi_no_myoujou <at> yahoo.co.jp>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guile <at> gnu.org. (Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Kiyoshi KANAZAWA <yoi_no_myoujou <at> yahoo.co.jp>
To: "bug-guile <at> gnu.org" <bug-guile <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [guile-2.1.1 alpha] make check FAIL & crirical warnings on Solaris10
 x86/64
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:51:09 +0900 (JST)
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

I tried alpha release of guile-2.1.1 on Solaris10 x86/64 with gcc 4.8.5.
Used -m32 to make 32 bit targets.



1. make check FAILs

FAIL: ports.test: %file-port-name-canonicalization: relative canonicalization with / - arguments: (expected-value "dev/null" actual-value "devices/pseudo/mm <at> 0:null")
FAIL: time.test: strftime: C99 %z format: EST+5
FAIL: check-guile

I guess the 1st one can be ignored.



2. Critical warning in make check

;;; warning: max diff 2.0 > (sqrt 4.0)

3. Critical warning in make
hash.c:115:3: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]
hash.c:124:3: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]
hash.c:213:5: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]


4. "warning: possibly unbound variable" in make
ice-9/readline.scm:127:38: warning: possibly unbound variable `readline-options-interface'
ice-9/readline.scm:158:4: warning: possibly unbound variable `%readline'
ice-9/readline.scm:208:4: warning: possibly unbound variable `*readline-completion-function*'
ice-9/readline.scm:212:2: warning: possibly unbound variable `*readline-completion-function*'
ice-9/readline.scm:215:10: warning: possibly unbound variable `*readline-completion-function*'
ice-9/readline.scm:218:10: warning: possibly unbound variable `*readline-completion-function*'
ice-9/readline.scm:64:0: warning: possibly unbound variable `readline-options-interface'
ice-9/readline.scm:98:49: warning: possibly unbound variable `%readline'
ice-9/runq.scm:93:8: warning: possibly unbound variable `apply-to-args'
language/ecmascript/base.scm:229:22: warning: possibly unbound variable `Boolean'
language/ecmascript/base.scm:230:21: warning: possibly unbound variable `String'
language/ecmascript/base.scm:231:21: warning: possibly unbound variable `Number'
language/ecmascript/function.scm:40:9: warning: possibly unbound variable `<js-array-object>'
language/ecmascript/function.scm:44:43: warning: possibly unbound variable `js-array-vector'
system/repl/debug.scm:172:24: warning: possibly unbound variable `program-module'
system/repl/server.scm:68:41: warning: possibly unbound variable `inet-aton'


5. "warning: pointer targets in passing argument" in make
srfi-4.c:156:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:159:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:162:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:165:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:168:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:171:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:174:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:177:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:180:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:183:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:189:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
srfi-4.c:192:1: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'scm_c_take_typed_bytevector' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]


6. "%% xxxxx/xxxxx conflict" in make
See attached file.


--- Kiyoshi <yoi_no_myoujou <at> yahoo.co.jp>
[conflict.gz (application/x-tar, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 9 years and 135 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.