Subject: RE: bug#22457: 24.5; [PATCH] `dired-mark-if' should not count non-changes

From: Drew Adams <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 06:32:46 -0700 (PDT)

> I think it's better to say (eq (char-after) dired-marker-char).

Yes, good.  Not a big deal either way, but
that's simpler and clearer.