From unknown Wed Aug 20 05:17:27 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#22440 <22440@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#22440 <22440@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t Reply-To: bug#22440 <22440@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 12:17:27 +0000 retitle 22440 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signa= ture t reassign 22440 emacs submitter 22440 Mark Oteiza severity 22440 important tag 22440 security thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 22 19:49:15 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2016 00:49:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58205 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmOB-0006pK-52 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:49:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41635) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmO9-0006p6-8M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:49:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmO3-0003k8-2j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:49:08 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:33516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmO2-0003k4-W6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:49:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmO1-0007rr-UE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:49:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmNy-0003jY-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:49:05 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]:34378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmNy-0003jE-D6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:49:02 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 6so70423513qgy.1 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:49:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9lGumD8aS/5pu091kZZdbmSqFDtzHDbpI+pdbXMM0rQ=; b=IMbAaCqU9PoGfn9FztDjWMqLni3OhczZV6FNVMfxtrDM7dwmdx10vc/8LyM4gw75F4 JxaEmt0kjpEHehcNshpshMAF7TKM3twS8JHoz6jYZpnBbpmn+utomF7wa/okOR8ElIoG ThN6XaDIKbEYbbBaL0RyN9+2/VXIDw/qurKAWgYDRGlzYvlIAciEhZtAYqdyRmvVDNdW zHUuV8IxwyYNh0uZtSKOTg50YvjQ7jh7lyUuvxX2Z+xieQXNCjqHxePFxLV0+ixeLK2A f+IdTaDIMJx7NX/A3mcWMg53rxTFCCYQCC7TCc31jfuTV64MF8LrL2izZBGk3cS90vNJ IVfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9lGumD8aS/5pu091kZZdbmSqFDtzHDbpI+pdbXMM0rQ=; b=RKNFl6oBQB+tZtKfT/E88s8sW/L1JKAQ67DdiR8LO+fX/C5fIArgTaDspPPWXKMpyz WCqxxbZHGEpQ5W6hXCjlng9zrQinUVZxUy5nKENIvqpRDwJnxL4QZhmt0GVLy+127Eex FOqK0lIJ/rNylzTmFxu/AFsQ0xa5oACP1h9JQNakgTSpCMk3gDxrMKgjqWzGZvp4ntyQ WDs9760MOjuvPFEV/4IIWYZexlIi5ragfT8On3XKKz8m8N/jUQ7Hs/lK3VocOK+eD254 aYd7xMWNTR5/b9hvWodL3A5fsn0OlaxGaDc9BUJibRTDcI6emg138xhKTmQcdlmUWvP2 UC5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOReFPI9nKbfeaq+sBReb4JdhoFw0DwKyQ28yZHWIfauG8JGe2uNyNPGLN8NS5IDcAKI X-Received: by 10.140.138.145 with SMTP id 139mr7982500qhk.18.1453510141217; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:49:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from holos.localdomain (c-73-172-248-173.hsd1.md.comcast.net. [73.172.248.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u202sm3916094qka.10.2016.01.22.16.48.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA63B685FA; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:48:57 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Oteiza To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:48:57 -0500 Message-ID: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) >From -Q: (package-initialize) (setq package-check-signature t) M-x package-import-keyring RET /path/to/package-keyring.gpg RET M-x list-packages RET Attempt to install a package; in this case, debbugs: Unsigned file =E2=80=98async-1.6.tar=E2=80=99 at http://elpa.gnu.org/pack= ages/ In GNU Emacs 25.1.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit, cairo version = 1.14.6, Xaw scroll bars) of 2016-01-22 built on logos Repository revision: 9b2375008348da99b5ec414cd3ca8c4669a12576 Configured using: 'configure --prefix=3D/usr --sysconfdir=3D/etc --libexecdir=3D/usr/lib --localstatedir=3D/var --without-gconf --without-imagemagick --with-cairo --with-modules --with-x-toolkit=3Dlucid 'CFLAGS=3D-march=3Dx86-64 -mtune=3Dgeneric -O0 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong --param=3Dssp-buffer-size=3D4 -g -fvar-tracking-assignments -g -fvar-tracking-assignments' LDFLAGS=3D-Wl,-O0,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro' Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG CAIRO SOUND GPM DBUS GSETTINGS NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE M17N_FLT LIBOTF XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS LUCID X11 MODULES Important settings: value of $LC_COLLATE: C value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 22 20:05:20 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2016 01:05:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58216 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmdj-0007DO-Tq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48429) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmdi-0007D9-Kg for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmdd-0003L0-1K for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:13 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmdc-0003Kp-UE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:12 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmdc-0001Ry-Et for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:12 -0500 Subject: control message for bug 19759 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:12 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) block 19759 by 22440 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 22 20:05:28 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2016 01:05:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58219 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmds-0007Dj-4G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48492) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmdq-0007DX-CA for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmdk-0003P3-Qg for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:21 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmdk-0003Ow-Nq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:20 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aMmdk-0001a2-DO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:20 -0500 Subject: control message for bug 22440 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:05:20 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) severity 22440 important From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 15 03:03:22 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2016 07:03:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b1q5C-0001yI-1U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 03:03:22 -0400 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:55017) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b1q58-0001y1-J0 for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 03:03:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C10C1612CA; Sun, 15 May 2016 00:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id Cmcv9s1WmSVy; Sun, 15 May 2016 00:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB331612D2; Sun, 15 May 2016 00:03:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id xLnysps9Wr-7; Sun, 15 May 2016 00:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [100.32.155.148]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F3521612CA; Sun, 15 May 2016 00:03:10 -0700 (PDT) To: Mark Oteiza From: Paul Eggert Subject: Re: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 00:03:09 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sorry, I don't see a bug here . package-check-signature t means check package signatures when installing, and do not install a package if it is unsigned. Which is what is happening, right? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 15 07:32:54 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2016 11:32:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51972 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b1uI2-0001dE-JX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 07:32:54 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:38890) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b1uI1-0001cz-3t for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 07:32:53 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id g17so95171961wme.1 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 15 May 2016 04:32:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JY6ggJvEEIvf6NGzXmJMVhdupN3RmmEBc4tl/s3Bn+4=; b=gwZXAKXVNPaflcAmWXGNO3/VdV9Ppe4AQFU5qZnOB6rKD3INr0AANz7ry5qcnfoJ1T s7aTEkJEqSZGGEct+knaoIaGdBgT53ZD8j6hZZxX8xJf/SVVO+Npmws1jLgIkPCNkAuR /Xdqwft+PIkAM7jtRtM6QReOCK7SZCNFdLrL1iuItqjC1pXQLx/I0UTJpZoFgWVOC1LT 1ZXwhCs1xUaiBuQWj/dnHN0hUMWjXlRwJNDZzdSUXtMW7pFPjuRKhK7wn5U2Fu0kY5P9 xKRm5TZx4ZTmsprjvCwDFK7qU84mFE6kzY0csn/8kDxBxUi+WvABgd5DQ3oS1fJJx335 qFgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JY6ggJvEEIvf6NGzXmJMVhdupN3RmmEBc4tl/s3Bn+4=; b=RZHuOCFIuEUxtxhcrdjbTAPl5D6wq63kj1sogw4rx735l7wqNbryXIubrXnToC496g GIxGeUBKVdqaT4iLe3mFmGq6BTFWsLCAQXN8YQUl6U2CtJ0bntPn/clIaLxgoM7UaIRC UM3nonMZ04FnLDRXrLfWkfJXZwJLJS5BfhoNMjdzLVOFR5vUh3RqwIunDGSGGESKFcuy hgDMrw0rhU3MGoR6lBgAi4Nzkx0RbG3qZ0YxiR9PIOw/ojtfOcjynJ24mmDvWnSQ2vrA 8a/Clv+PilR0Sx4u9+R4uMavqQSbTk1LK4BqsQd6i4Oy8gbehh03iwcIWYpSiBW6RDi9 CsdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUxfomu9dN2cKk4FdwrILL8Je8mQ9lO93mxZ+qigvu5wTCR9vauDiLfaNxAcjt2JA== X-Received: by 10.194.148.142 with SMTP id ts14mr16752365wjb.39.1463311967541; Sun, 15 May 2016 04:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f188sm12893965wma.2.2016.05.15.04.32.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 15 May 2016 04:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Paul Eggert , Mark Oteiza References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 14:32:44 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) On 05/15/2016 10:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > package-check-signature t means check package signatures when installing, and do > not install a package if it is unsigned. Which is what is happening, right? Aren't packages coming from GNU ELPA supposed to all be signed? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 15 12:50:41 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2016 16:50:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52941 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b1zFZ-00033t-0j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 12:50:41 -0400 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:39239) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b1zFX-00033g-IX for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 12:50:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC751612CA; Sun, 15 May 2016 09:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 1JcfLnyohpYj; Sun, 15 May 2016 09:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D391612D7; Sun, 15 May 2016 09:50:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id iwP5-p5Pwgi7; Sun, 15 May 2016 09:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [100.32.155.148]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE6211612CA; Sun, 15 May 2016 09:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Dmitry Gutov , Mark Oteiza References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 09:50:29 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Artur Malabarba X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 05/15/2016 10:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: >=20 >> package-check-signature t means check package signatures when installi= ng, and do >> not install a package if it is unsigned. Which is what is happening, r= ight? >=20 > Aren't packages coming from GNU ELPA supposed to all be signed? Sorry, I don't know. I don't even know how to determine whether that part= icular package is signed. I know little about packages and am just trying to get= this blocking bug fixed. It would be helpful if someone could look into this who knows about packa= ges. I'll CC: this to Artur, who I hope fills the bill. Artur, could you pleas= e look at Bug#22440, or let us know who we should ask about this? Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 16 06:59:23 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2016 10:59:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GF8-0007Iq-Rb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 06:59:23 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]:34459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GF6-0007Ib-Qd for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 06:59:21 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c189so55212247vkb.1 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 03:59:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=B9C8lsBe3Gx2qQxrJp7Ip/rtO6wlmg5y6Dzx8OGY1PQ=; b=fGLkg6cp9aOXVztKENey0poSB6jjxmrIB/ug5tpPBXkCYSmb1w8PUyUsw5bNMgx3pQ VAoKpPvDzFFrKmu5esiTciwYK2UNY5+emsXc5gRn9Lh7vi5IuVbyYXrSnp36tbyqtn0T ue/EKYkTU89F7y/RFOymG8RjuwRam8SnsSYingnXCc4tgRDJdxUo0VVrx4l3G7cb6b/U sJskCKv8MhkBNbNZVLoBpDTC9TpbuejBRpfCaBB/vQ2ARth1pl1F/kxot0G2OTaLOzoz QsdUtqCfKPoFaUyW0a3oZUvJsh5J7uTcuHi357Ql9MSJWyiBtd1WSL6qSDlHOQMdXDD0 Ym8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=B9C8lsBe3Gx2qQxrJp7Ip/rtO6wlmg5y6Dzx8OGY1PQ=; b=IeayZlz8zd3hunlgdrPRGl05rcfY0rJxxZSz3ymI8C+8KxPYCjdOxwlpUIXzF6dCxt oZwXruvbPd9roJeRzCstiDlnMHhyHbLJVqKkwumUv+536hyekVLBgwiJ1BdoisEANF6k fQA8APgu7+SJbh4cWrd6WoD7Xzgzt6/8D79ctC3oI9PP7gYlPvz0/xzgCgsVZ4CqJBMU Gl5bGgYiJUkkgy9pzlCHDHrIYbN39vLU5uTjfTmy5MhmyzokaosGNgaue/Hz2z5XA16X AQocmebjcLIkUoUhYmV7nQo12rzt+bMF+MnwSj6p8h0relqLLaiz7QjYMU4eNHx3vFwb lYYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW1vEDhGhgasFrpNvYKnkh1xdV4R00L7adbPORZPfV67s5MqMMaqpLmoh0mg2YVOzIK0/0Ipf1DLsLdRA== X-Received: by 10.31.181.83 with SMTP id e80mr12947322vkf.26.1463396355213; Mon, 16 May 2016 03:59:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> From: Artur Malabarba Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:59:04 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Paul Eggert , Dmitry Gutov , Mark Oteiza Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143a68ceb119e0532f38380 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a1143a68ceb119e0532f38380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'll look into it tonight. Thanks for ccing me. On Sun, 15 May 2016 1:50 pm Paul Eggert, wrote: > Dmitry Gutov wrote: > > On 05/15/2016 10:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > > > >> package-check-signature t means check package signatures when > installing, and do > >> not install a package if it is unsigned. Which is what is happening, > right? > > > > Aren't packages coming from GNU ELPA supposed to all be signed? > > Sorry, I don't know. I don't even know how to determine whether that > particular > package is signed. I know little about packages and am just trying to get > this > blocking bug fixed. > > It would be helpful if someone could look into this who knows about > packages. > I'll CC: this to Artur, who I hope fills the bill. Artur, could you please > look > at Bug#22440, or let us know who we should ask about this? Thanks. > --001a1143a68ceb119e0532f38380 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'll look into it tonight.
Thanks for ccing me.


On Sun, 15 May 2016 1:50 pm= Paul Eggert, <eggert@cs.ucla.edu<= /a>> wrote:
Dmitry Gutov wrote:<= br> > On 05/15/2016 10:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
>> package-check-signature t means check package signatures when inst= alling, and do
>> not install a package if it is unsigned. Which is what is happenin= g, right?
>
> Aren't packages coming from GNU ELPA supposed to all be signed?
Sorry, I don't know. I don't even know how to determine whether tha= t particular
package is signed. I know little about packages and am just trying to get t= his
blocking bug fixed.

It would be helpful if someone could look into this who knows about package= s.
I'll CC: this to Artur, who I hope fills the bill. Artur, could you ple= ase look
at Bug#22440, or let us know who we should ask about this? Thanks.
--001a1143a68ceb119e0532f38380-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 09:50:41 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 13:50:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56632 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b31s1-0000Gi-IN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:50:41 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f54.google.com ([209.85.213.54]:35731) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b31s0-0000GY-HF for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:50:40 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id f66so61755453vkh.2 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:50:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WIw98U4zzdgwQOSwn69hI94LaOQ7JRUSD7abw+Pkm+0=; b=bbBT+sc26mFGt59fg+2bdvxb0GmlFW58xdoYJ6+jiNTWE7eF45F0WpjA7VvCoT3wen KxQ8Wa1ZkAd/Iw7GDrJoCW4a1VgOab0vCLWJlNz122CthjOA6iAlJF9PYfRP0h7jIF7P TaHk9Q5fZohqqWdKgm2tEKltbOyqdDLFmsLuF3sXD4LZwtmHv04uVjyk9GjwJGtCPZyP 09RnrDAhuURsehaFXz99hY+AiiwcStP+g5p45j0/jnbUWYqdD3HXM3C1k/78VHPA2mz4 CJZOS89Rp3uXX0xWpR277KAMPOUR4CFCmUSWJpEqWFNEihfv1t2VFB0ZJTBGz5GofIod 5UjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WIw98U4zzdgwQOSwn69hI94LaOQ7JRUSD7abw+Pkm+0=; b=gcYQDftTSSh9yAP6EaNum1gURX3lRhZq1yYTgyvcrY/v+ik4xmO8+WNY7f/QazGwqz VBXcf0ZpxXzViR3g0beuHN26M0UbUCFr379AwR4glGaweHRkTMUo37t+ceOKzQm8EML7 I1E+rQtaHRWG08gCE+8vFZllLWTNIV9JauXL1kK2X7FayHso53F2N5Tl8xNDEkjop18S QvhvOH9AyZwEssSRLIfXjE2moS5UXQ4NfHH/vO+7o4cPHhWC45tUxdbcZlK3syCbGcsa hHyek7dMiUY2gs4MAZN1rIACY8cwYGJjOubR/YWtZ+jrGjXqLN4AHrp8qtqFtYEcCmBl 4sMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWGasqXuX/AcD7KoYzNAb9gIqYqh4lDelEwBkBdYhQub3ubQTm1egFehI6JG4ldCbbMrS7doBQdFxk6LA== X-Received: by 10.31.51.11 with SMTP id z11mr4062774vkz.150.1463579434814; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:50:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: From: Artur Malabarba Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 13:50:25 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Paul Eggert , Dmitry Gutov , Mark Oteiza Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114475985032bc05331e24a0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a114475985032bc05331e24a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you? Also, I believe the import-keyring step is unnecessary. Emacs already uses the package-keyring file that ships with it. --001a114475985032bc05331e24a0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed= already.
Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you?

Also, I believe the import-keyring step is unnecessary. E= macs already uses the package-keyring file that ships with it.
--001a114475985032bc05331e24a0-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 12:29:48 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 16:29:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57131 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b34M0-0004Dg-2z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:29:48 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f182.google.com ([209.85.161.182]:36370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b34Ly-0004DS-LB for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:29:47 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x189so53320127ywe.3 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jT5UPnIXlYDk4Z6S/oRcubUJregK4sJTeH4dNLu5cQM=; b=znjY7OBBLLQILXpXppMfSwxYpfkI/4+UkcWkqB6NofxkD58xLZo27CIOAFZ71wAHC5 HEoz5VhpgC1cmPUJY39LCOwhd8zxmfdpSU4kYR5bCYJHO4YkHiHYoLo/MM5abhx5fKol ntuOk5dFwnmyXXeShPkX/WhYHWRP3+BM3OifKTtAtO3W0QErJa/b0hWhaFqI5GVV6Tew SCSqwp1tnM1BSoesbXExKUdC54VtmWiikBPlisBm0y6GV1aynbibGzCJGybOYx6DGzb7 BlkanKpxOoXOE4FvWTveQQfXuoX4ak5gib2FnPvRh9A27eIk1Z1pdJHzT3Nbolzb1Ku5 jG6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jT5UPnIXlYDk4Z6S/oRcubUJregK4sJTeH4dNLu5cQM=; b=lPu/zglSDxYYaGq7KhfhMxWGF4+jGOBt2gQ0x9h/LjKac0On4jDak1dpZP15oEX9g3 2XcwIVqtNGasx0uwA0Iv0mahWLELvzC2oZLNuql1UP6jFAQExXPcxXYbuDrWX5FVu5LI pihrIDTPZVrsQ0bRrVhhmFRdRK2/X8xx5H9POrX7iozF2hwDV+6JEzmzpbKpF7S0Px9j ikcL1KkZctesxwg0sOiBKWJvyCdSwgsQyUXzW6P093Ol4Xz1/FG1oGV01zMoceEO+6BK h2AHH9ZkabTBAeNgBDVLC+Uj7mxtq9JrZQ2uiHRMoLejIvJFeo/rwHwh3fnDi3os4ADH 45Jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUYvXP/MtENDmsv2bEdQei4T2gym6eCAGON2IXTUjalZG2SKQMK0pw4QJKkru3U7TGN X-Received: by 10.13.229.133 with SMTP id o127mr4318209ywe.99.1463588980844; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:29:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-96-227-83-242.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [96.227.83.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k80sm5355088ywe.31.2016.05.18.09.29.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 May 2016 09:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C911669793; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:29:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:29:35 -0400 From: Mark Oteiza To: Artur Malabarba Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t Message-ID: <20160518162935.GA9042@holos.localdomain> References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1+5 (b74dfb9fa901) (2016-04-27) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert , Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) On 18/05/16 at 01:50pm, Artur Malabarba wrote: > I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. > Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you? It appears to have been fixed. No idea what fixed it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 12:36:35 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 16:36:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57138 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b34SY-0004Nn-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:36:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:37667) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b34SX-0004Nb-Gg for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:36:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a17so88334479wme.0 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:36:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7QWGwtUAnlYCWZlkbBcotKWK3tlhGLJuDc5TGnlSm1Y=; b=OyUnsNXrlQTBsehWq4kSmCqxKvHG6ykTOvJ+7CEbrL2+4stZ1BPVrVEpZ0pWX/rRxW OZbWT6196rK3GHFJGbkZOWT8M8nPNMCQPdbjNhmUPcULQvkGPwatf9NcaIi63wjJVQte d4YdYkGv7/Qz3ZyT2HgndjNYskU2YlZgBH9xz7qZB6gwV4GA8K4W3p6ujSS6wBdm3suS jqMmd7TXSRMGQQCzP+LlBMT24GGdu6nSErjWC15lwuCoCwRKXpHlv59lZmbmboaglVBz ZGms/KVsmRkdZ0pYIlF+MRD4PburAei8G+jmr4w+Aa3g3igs/q0JdjXyH1wtGk7JeLaM AZaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7QWGwtUAnlYCWZlkbBcotKWK3tlhGLJuDc5TGnlSm1Y=; b=kznXlkq7ElM3qoeGIXEeMcgbHmE/tTPBpJ56AVN12Mdq5LE3WvqjHNFHl/8mRIsPsw V5Ws12wYvAfSjth5KetURMCFGJBgWI/Ksp9GNQMUR9TggoQ0WuURyDavnxfhFoDOtYO7 QmMznNBibmhPCcR1SufrNOvCOLvZLwd9aMKYUoZ5FE63WOSbTPJeW+aa6CvWAx6oSMjm uBp90DHZQFbLHIGsopf1Iej5K4qel9WX68d2fmr4/2ngYH99H0CTBk2Wx5bBI+Ho1orM swIkkzmqUXjtwEeFR2yR20c6nK3+T18xUDkfReeGHqxQxoNHSWUZrkvCHAFooBWgjBUP C0AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUHcVtsYAumoolt5PArIzyFVmeVwahUxm3B+c6WlantQDB5VNF188tJqrFGl51otg== X-Received: by 10.194.5.103 with SMTP id r7mr9560298wjr.0.1463589387772; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 131sm10007921wmu.17.2016.05.18.09.36.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 18 May 2016 09:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Artur Malabarba , Paul Eggert , Mark Oteiza References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 19:36:24 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) On 05/18/2016 04:50 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. > Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you? I've just tried (setq package-check-signature t), and then installing async 1.6, and the problem was there. Not the most recent Emacs, though (revision 1a5a05c). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 12:44:13 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 16:44:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b34Zx-0004YF-Ly for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:44:13 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175]:33467) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b34Zw-0004Y3-3o for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:44:12 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x194so53846201ywd.0 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:44:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=52tlz9YmYM5l5bM+ONTdTp8A5vWae9bfEnlIQaXjH+c=; b=0Y/epYErgy/+cYW6l3QOhHKNU5UHc5PZX7sGBvPJYVNOwjPvKSnrvSw0phh7Qbw5fR cYfSVxHnfKtRz8KQY7WldjMt1BpyF+6P1aH2SR43ue4e65WekNC9RPwY3/FVHvTpHNGY rcUSr+6sg/UvU+SCgXV4GRcdIyzn1ku2iSfXQq+FQkBWvBGJ0ZFaDivYtvOuQYxYemRW buOblmppj0bRPuzA+ghcWvcBK0eLHU/ztQ2ppCo/d+r49KyItKDL+vR81mcEkRvgqo2l Jr6Z7t9XWaryvVhXUUK6jxNsnr+IqmlOLO7KcfIBg86yI3YJ52J4cRJUZeJF9uxIwb/i v5Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=52tlz9YmYM5l5bM+ONTdTp8A5vWae9bfEnlIQaXjH+c=; b=aPS2uSOLV2eU5FdXPlyMPKiJlJgAWuuSNFequkNHtWi7yaU39O9cAQYXRFdxWvYv1S Z8ssLgstEcMi4V/cHC5kVtM7C5VigaJoR/qL4oPfPkSgnpmp/mmScrOTTO7ub2w5h53X BHt9tLWPgZjS6lyguAvJ45Ctol/djmssqZCQjKWXsVr5ealM6WkHiNqd/WzXv8I6O5Pe 3gK6SZCl4Eorfp2Ngin75fZOZkYezD175NdBhf66/YLQmNZN7sHx0Lhz42poTWIVg9Qv 3kw2kmHf/gygrIZ3+V36veGiMP2y5dPRi7OusAWt25uyJv8gRC5VEoM+JT3Nuz3qegSf +d0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWax/6Xuam0syH5J2C/AvRC+Qk6XfuXDSmfiGWqM26vmID/nQ+ucf44Z5DHq53hb/8Y X-Received: by 10.129.76.147 with SMTP id z141mr4464919ywa.136.1463589846526; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-96-227-83-242.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [96.227.83.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i188sm5397246ywc.19.2016.05.18.09.44.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 May 2016 09:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E40069793; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:44:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:44:05 -0400 From: Mark Oteiza To: Dmitry Gutov Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t Message-ID: <20160518164405.GA9932@holos.localdomain> References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1+5 (b74dfb9fa901) (2016-04-27) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert , Artur Malabarba X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) On 18/05/16 at 07:36pm, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 05/18/2016 04:50 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > > I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. > > Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you? > > I've just tried (setq package-check-signature t), and then installing async > 1.6, and the problem was there. > > Not the most recent Emacs, though (revision 1a5a05c). Mine is a little older, and I must retract my previous email. Apparently after doing M-x list-packages, package-check-signature is allow-unsigned again, not t. I have to (setq package-check-signature t) after list-packages now. The issue persists. FWIW my version is 2eb6817 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 14:10:25 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 18:10:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57205 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b35vN-0006dn-Ha for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:10:25 -0400 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:52407) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b35vM-0006dZ-2o for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:10:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D979B16133B; Wed, 18 May 2016 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id IOAGIgqxrZko; Wed, 18 May 2016 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31590161329; Wed, 18 May 2016 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id bWIxoupNRlZf; Wed, 18 May 2016 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1539A161326; Wed, 18 May 2016 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Mark Oteiza , Dmitry Gutov References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> <20160518164405.GA9932@holos.localdomain> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 11:10:14 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160518164405.GA9932@holos.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Artur Malabarba X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) On 05/18/2016 09:44 AM, Mark Oteiza wrote: > Apparently > after doing M-x list-packages, package-check-signature is > allow-unsigned again, not t. I observed the same thing, but as I have no idea how packages ought to work I didn't know whether that was expected. If not, it's a bug too -- should it get a different bug report or is this all the same bug? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 14:23:25 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 18:23:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b367w-0006z3-U4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:23:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:35187) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b367v-0006yn-0N for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:23:23 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id r12so47322869wme.0 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 11:23:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vh9tdKVmgfC7Kv6z+NJqRRQ71btcrKAsVvx55yd3LcA=; b=ME5Pa0RjTVbN0ULFTqVutyAvZQl52apCDqrOj4UAiglcTu7oKfGsfUUJhBm3la2TPL ItHYHCHtZYHw1Q7DPpRDSu6bljalhTPP9vEmZyQ6XafelHzme94QkoPotGZLtL4GZEWv 8xo5tXkQT/aIddoG2EtLk169MCUsMDOUauMJ7PoQEgdfPToRUK5OUlMUrVWBxEjkni4n pri55o1x5TSJ5enDEfKQkE5RkmP3N6KH/7LEPQxv3Qvl3cdLBg182k3t5qNhVTztWVaa AXYi3ywHC8gVGB/nzgifco8iPp9ekcn/q7lcJeukrq8O/FBXfFT0RVJInIxeKt4WbTLr cOFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vh9tdKVmgfC7Kv6z+NJqRRQ71btcrKAsVvx55yd3LcA=; b=ZssOBZB4LcpZfBO2mwNgTww6hDJQ9HKRCBROQRPPs+O3BIjO+KxemaWKbZctMbs8tK B+I9TBvwOj3bR7heyiBC3ZYZ6l9roThOrldtFYOX3Xe1JS0eldiLJDmgEcTlKGyAKTSx rwZb9vUdbqDvCWaeQM358iHQVVE3jMpviPp7YxfN/cAcBhbWGgS+dVtXaGRkl9wJBcfG 2Sefo/B7viTMXnKNfajVmzt+GZCM2imIQUSAXBTRQoWz3o1VaKRnrkni31nAkQm9qdDx I8O6tvDq4jiRlMx0X2eZHqXZG2KMYWBNo7Lr9cNrq7mk7V8z4kSXXichbpD06kqB3DjL p28Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUmO98bZm4AkxTryufcUBMo492VrGafWb4Z/cUrVO/Df9cX120dTy/FoMM7TOisjA== X-Received: by 10.194.47.74 with SMTP id b10mr6097268wjn.4.1463595797314; Wed, 18 May 2016 11:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t3sm15063065wmf.20.2016.05.18.11.23.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 18 May 2016 11:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Paul Eggert , Mark Oteiza References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> <20160518164405.GA9932@holos.localdomain> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:23:13 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Artur Malabarba X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) On 05/18/2016 09:10 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > I observed the same thing, but as I have no idea how packages ought to > work I didn't know whether that was expected. If not, it's a bug too -- > should it get a different bug report or is this all the same bug? These are related, but orthogonal issues. The newfound bug is that package-refresh-contents for some reason expects that package-check-signature could have only been modified via Custom. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 15:24:36 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 19:24:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b375A-0008Tj-G4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:24:36 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com ([209.85.192.48]:36304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b3757-0008TV-3m for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:24:34 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id w36so31596741qge.3 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:24:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=FrsO85fUVFePq+Q6BKBM70e8zG6l//TZ33D93togPog=; b=e1oL8geGKKkDZQpZ78N9cViAK6SkjBIGPYiCBHSm7R0SOZY1GQRBL+SBtlXy2GyOJo nDmJW5LpqAk8LOHj/W8XqL2h9JWohAAjN+8BZvYntYMAyWniIUszrL/FJRv76BI3fqPT JljogjsfMJ5QhoXn8qNZIca9poqwVt9V9rrcSdRq1yV4tDxEE4FJmfi8voIXk+NoH3G+ nsU56/UmFFseHx6OVA2VDwlHahrmzCxIiR2a5ThGCc+ohULXaEVUsxRcNeCmDK9m4OWw aYSMQJfekUB5ehsq6SqKorNsUNoeDaJRM54eH5irCZUP/cs5I/5a/eOC1EBviViHVzQp k/0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=FrsO85fUVFePq+Q6BKBM70e8zG6l//TZ33D93togPog=; b=e+/sqWaQJRzQsf6NWJikw85zJ9GWnCsrDtXd532zVYCijbPi2hD28rhfJreyB9y/xr tALt/7SHWVZ1LjJ2WJtoI7dPhr2T+llNc4/PFs7kiQd7yst6aqO4FohLFbW3/ynzBx71 w+6WYIs4BC7EUQHJJXeUj6Avv9ph+3Dc/NZ1iwMmwXnSpexzcqz86T9/svTEUIkoTMrq bkWFiaa/WI/PZNf+Tom4CboFRrYbqRxqWRMfHQoUBntQLx2rE7m1TAuvbVXTPrmh4GO0 PgJ03D0p6ksd0s+r+8MZzKEWDrwV8u/+sMozCnsT5D2rz7wXTucFffju+5orvkG4FfI9 9Fag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUzbyZmxbYnJzFY8Gq1AsVp/h6McfPppLCyKhAHE/c0jmK9UhDQbKX6unfTkI8I6g== X-Received: by 10.140.223.10 with SMTP id t10mr9856032qhb.96.1463599467552; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Gandalf-Linux.gmail.com ([179.184.224.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f83sm4876258qkb.25.2016.05.18.12.24.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 May 2016 12:24:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Artur Malabarba To: Paul Eggert Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> <20160518164405.GA9932@holos.localdomain> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:24:17 -0300 In-Reply-To: (Paul Eggert's message of "Wed, 18 May 2016 11:10:14 -0700") Message-ID: <87vb2b6ufy.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: Mark Oteiza , ueno@gnu.org, 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Paul Eggert writes: > I observed the same thing, but as I have no idea how packages ought to work I didn't know whether that was expected. If not, it's a bug too -- > should it get a different bug report or is this all the same bug? Yes, it's a bug. Looks like it was introduced by the commit below. I've CC'd Daiki. 14aec913ac3f0dd408487c0e8327403e0f239964 Author: Daiki Ueno AuthorDate: Wed Feb 17 16:44:16 2016 +0900 Take advantage of new GnuPG version check function * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el (epg-configuration-find): Declare. (package-refresh-contents): Use `epg-configuration-find' to check if EPG is usable. 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el | 15 +++++++++------ modified lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el @@ -1452,9 +1452,8 @@ package-initialize (defvar package--downloads-in-progress nil "List of in-progress asynchronous downloads.") -(declare-function epg-check-configuration "epg-config" - (config &optional minimum-version)) -(declare-function epg-configuration "epg-config" ()) +(declare-function epg-configuration-find "epg-config" + (protocol &optional force)) (declare-function epg-import-keys-from-file "epg" (context keys)) ;;;###autoload @@ -1554,11 +1553,15 @@ package-refresh-contents (let ((default-keyring (expand-file-name "package-keyring.gpg" data-directory)) (inhibit-message async)) + (if (get 'package-check-signature 'saved-value) + (when package-check-signature + (epg-configuration-find 'OpenPGP)) + (setq package-check-signature + (if (epg-configuration-find 'OpenPGP) + 'allow-unsigned))) (when (and package-check-signature (file-exists-p default-keyring)) (condition-case-unless-debug error - (progn - (epg-check-configuration (epg-configuration)) - (package-import-keyring default-keyring)) + (package-import-keyring default-keyring) (error (message "Cannot import default keyring: %S" (cdr error)))))) (package--download-and-read-archives async)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 15:33:20 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 19:33:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57284 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b37Dc-0000Gl-Kx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:33:20 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f54.google.com ([209.85.192.54]:33104) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b37Db-0000GZ-B6 for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:33:19 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id f92so31775966qgf.0 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:33:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=MEigMIn6gDLkouElbY/PGB4L7YkDs0skS2Kyk3fDCYc=; b=tWvA4V1x0t/As95SffLJd5HNkD1S/M0nwFM5OCVkLvjkUsdY0uxnS2uBv32ptPrWfg yaT4gCXId/FxmWzU31B4AM6wHfPsU2MNokHwF5Oa0bKEbBcfS6YbNGk+dFX0Q9wm0ZAW f+8OR6ZHajATEJz7TapHHR00Z/kW0wnKRDhhKDDvLAaOzPi+HUeENbsFRdNI3f6Fs7ex PAfFM6Nmx11n0elPZKxF2d5ZmyjQ/jHS/g10pLzwTHnrP6gXdZFXPPAuCGGxgfInNjcJ Emm3O/R25VAUu/iIxrilU9ID4yibWPnXnuDx65FPKjKAu4WSp5NMJVuZ72N3AwB77juH okAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=MEigMIn6gDLkouElbY/PGB4L7YkDs0skS2Kyk3fDCYc=; b=HDWp1iG/JtsZ4dT1C0C+euZyFjzz/y50oY3E//PdErkTQVtdzyOOX0Z9NljA18UlCI i6wP7Dje7uv3AGLbLTH1htSRzFDl81yzt+tBiJ+csvSB+lbpK0Tp9pPIzvgtT0kxIb+M B16ut8pN4u4uAAS8vtG1azGSlL1K9yUL/mUstuphW9kGt6GeQQ96w2btBFoptpcf+npx t0W2sDGBLSXiXGa6kSP/Be+koaBVGPNuL3tchc5w2WCHQf/KYob7Ec/wZFstQLvZ+miq X1YhaQ99QSdOYR0lsEnXSuQbnpyRy5kj3DbhUd4IWTqeRXnaNn9G5uFL/8+zrLN/6Cod +r5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXQIwCgyx4c5ZDjxVK06wNR2aEtVLilRRIitTWHmORQtkYxtFT8x96N/gcxjOwDpg== X-Received: by 10.140.154.137 with SMTP id a131mr10189769qha.8.1463599993909; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Gandalf-Linux.gmail.com ([179.184.224.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r1sm2810778qkl.27.2016.05.18.12.33.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 May 2016 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Artur Malabarba To: Paul Eggert Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> <20160518164405.GA9932@holos.localdomain> <87vb2b6ufy.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:33:04 -0300 In-Reply-To: <87vb2b6ufy.fsf@gmail.com> (Artur Malabarba's message of "Wed, 18 May 2016 16:24:17 -0300") Message-ID: <87k2ir6u1b.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: Mark Oteiza , ueno@gnu.org, 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Artur Malabarba writes: > Paul Eggert writes: > >> I observed the same thing, but as I have no idea how packages ought to work I didn't know whether that was expected. If not, it's a bug too -- >> should it get a different bug report or is this all the same bug? > > Yes, it's a bug. Looks like it was introduced by the commit below. > I've CC'd Daiki. Here's a proposed fix. --- Author: Artur Malabarba * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el (package-refresh-contents): Don't change the value of `package-check-signature'. (package-check-signature): Use `epg-find-configuration' instead of `executable-find'. 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el | 16 ++++++---------- modified lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el @@ -302,10 +302,12 @@ package-directory-list :risky t :version "24.1") -(defvar epg-gpg-program) +(declare-function epg-find-configuration "epg-config" + (protocol &optional force)) (defcustom package-check-signature - (if (progn (require 'epg-config) (executable-find epg-gpg-program)) + (if (and (require 'epg-config) + (epg-find-configuration 'OpenPGP)) 'allow-unsigned) "Non-nil means to check package signatures when installing. The value `allow-unsigned' means to still install a package even if @@ -1457,8 +1459,6 @@ package-initialize (defvar package--downloads-in-progress nil "List of in-progress asynchronous downloads.") -(declare-function epg-find-configuration "epg-config" - (protocol &optional force)) (declare-function epg-import-keys-from-file "epg" (context keys)) ;;;###autoload @@ -1558,12 +1558,8 @@ package-refresh-contents (let ((default-keyring (expand-file-name "package-keyring.gpg" data-directory)) (inhibit-message async)) - (if (get 'package-check-signature 'saved-value) - (when package-check-signature - (epg-find-configuration 'OpenPGP)) - (setq package-check-signature - (if (epg-find-configuration 'OpenPGP) - 'allow-unsigned))) + (when package-check-signature + (epg-find-configuration 'OpenPGP)) (when (and package-check-signature (file-exists-p default-keyring)) (condition-case-unless-debug error (package-import-keyring default-keyring) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 15:44:02 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 19:44:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57297 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b37Ny-0000ZI-86 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:44:02 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]:33134) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b37Nx-0000Yi-1V for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:44:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id n63so33504347qkf.0 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:44:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=fMd0zVrf7foR9/XY9X9IKprlAMMGcQI+2PFHSTEvQ0g=; b=f1R7UGGWAIYn2EScVQnUCg0cz6IXX/3zA03i5R6isiMdllmOM/+y6Bp8nZK9jszwx7 Vm4Zz6e5FYXSSmsl2Z10nmd3Epl8gV9zHnDUi+oRiyvPocBp3gsRmKAqCwr8qXTEgOBZ x+R4GYRX7q3Z5aNukT9XjSMK8wXGbVOdD5F4NwrWuluI6Drfcq5/U6mbXuy5OwfJ5TcL pVF1x+voV2H43lq55QIiHALxiz3+7RNUE88P4Tl6trkWkLCZfUI0vQQbpuXQDix+1MkQ /lIH3rUgGP/Hht4YuGFCdPZPWGhL0yGm781HxGhvSNKK4uHie/aY5ZVHXeLYAU5Ccvnx KyyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=fMd0zVrf7foR9/XY9X9IKprlAMMGcQI+2PFHSTEvQ0g=; b=GD7iXKDn0aQ4kVDeICPQ9UxPfRzOODs4mM5aT8oqcWH6smM0ORm+gJfp0fM/9/iAJX M3j4zWyx06HH/kGzuz0W1MyFM1fAh38Vu+7lZnBoJ3KuoATTYB3LZQlMalt9LxNfjidc cU5Eljee6adhr8Bb+Q4JfscMAtj9gy/g74sIEgf6KyXLDEZELUd8/K8F5aliWLtA8lKX xpmDadW//Sb6YcHgCNX1zBo29GQSRsfWL5nh4rcBth4ojH/a/4buO5jE8/ARF9bhPzRE mjMfZIFi+8CFMwFjAj7LoTXE6z38WrXBtrNhZ3ngsvNyuwiBvLMqRF1d1iu7F+FC71mh 6rKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXO0dpaxUrUxaGXhzFls6D99aemKoxp7TZ5KExnEF+c2tbrAD6qLf8qBDD+bSJb7w== X-Received: by 10.55.17.19 with SMTP id b19mr10250187qkh.61.1463600635661; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Gandalf-Linux.gmail.com ([179.184.224.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 90sm4928999qgh.28.2016.05.18.12.43.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 May 2016 12:43:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Artur Malabarba To: Paul Eggert Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:43:44 -0300 In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Wed, 18 May 2016 13:50:25 +0000") Message-ID: <87futf6tjj.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: Mark Oteiza , 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Artur Malabarba writes: > I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. > Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you? Given the other information provided on this thread, I can indeed reproduce this now. I'll look into it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 16:44:15 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 20:44:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b38KF-0005MZ-3k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:44:15 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]:36307) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b38KD-0005MN-Tx for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:44:14 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id y2so6573126vka.3 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 13:44:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8dqTIOLXt3RVrxRRNPjRuMnreBVDsTMk4iIR3jdmu2A=; b=YyPmPJYoHbbsorh7TKyjDXI/7pBc9btI+wEYqoGZED8YWyJnWIRD+OwYvoxmLF/h3I tCmTJ1biFlJrh3ve1leUluo5uK+B4gC4EHyKa+2KfCQVpviQs03A1miS2H9W1z/0LF2F GRZHL9L7GKxH4ury0RZTl0DC6DoqhVXfy6vNVuf8CVWkLF+vcZSh0/z+iTASxv3qxwy3 NOr/lzBTeTnrqRflczaw2kum7tMPfDa0bS12tet4LrcPziB7Hlaz48njf7rVyOgmqacj k5irDRSmfD9Ny8NB6nP5Juw6zbuJJXmHbUzxAiPOeuwmFFFOp+cn8/R5Hv/qOHrEQykb 0X7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8dqTIOLXt3RVrxRRNPjRuMnreBVDsTMk4iIR3jdmu2A=; b=C/Ks/1Siw9ReDlZbsS2br+msIe/nmoU9/U89pGibpP+S973trkVcYDH2Js4IiCLLH8 t9U+OVF5ke4C5TQxX296RiimO3Wz8DZNmLZuNY48b2VQPpdIZbbSC/LTmuQaKxGw1En/ X+qh9bQauQ/WBMVwIL+xQDnnqCeCf3+zj7geelDAl0BACVcF2qa/dkugBXKB7ksw2yVx 4b2LqXxiuLWZskKFIs6joJxHqNFrlvLe4CrAttjkL2Ih9CHSi26Iyqkxam34OswPik5Y zN89pfrWxCqPSFEmghPvQlhL4/50nF/ABVbYJaDjzv9Tw4o30pcAj+tupnbQskg8q0Vy oD5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXz1WMXsE7HvI3TZvXg9WYWKp6mYwdcGLPsYn8xvcqrc8WYX2dQNfrA3LG96RguiJqUACAAGImEdXylLw== X-Received: by 10.31.51.11 with SMTP id z11mr5181863vkz.150.1463604248342; Wed, 18 May 2016 13:44:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <87futf6tjj.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87futf6tjj.fsf@gmail.com> From: Artur Malabarba Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 20:43:58 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Paul Eggert Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114475985079c8053323eb4e X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: Mark Oteiza , 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a114475985079c8053323eb4e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 How do we run tests for a single file with the new test structure? I use to call `make package-test` inside the test/automated directory. But I can't seem to find an equivalent with the new structure. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:43 PM Artur Malabarba wrote: > Artur Malabarba writes: > > > I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. > > Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you? > > Given the other information provided on this thread, I can indeed > reproduce this now. I'll look into it. > --001a114475985079c8053323eb4e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
How do we run tests for a single file with the new test st= ructure? I use to call `make package-test` inside the test/automated direct= ory. But I can't seem to find an equivalent with the new structure.
Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com> writes:

> I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. > Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you?

Given the other information provided on this thread, I can indeed
reproduce this now. I'll look into it.
--001a114475985079c8053323eb4e-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 17:09:47 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 21:09:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b38ix-0005xZ-FQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 17:09:47 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:35153) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b38iv-0005xL-UI for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 17:09:46 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id f66so78315345vkh.2 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:09:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uJU0MhEan3K+DE/A5PlEKlyxFoVuzQvRh+DL4ZRXp7A=; b=jp6UId1O80v1lVGSP7DgmPEHgeokwSjvfa80ImK6rCcIYbXR8wUU7RHjkHyoytWyHG PL+L9MYsfR6T5wmLre1meRlqiqCBDsASksyRQ5p049cK85WW+4VJaWO7pj7QMjBF7o3+ C4WpiWyQKQUxc+fbaevU08JN+ykZd8qe2YJIGrGEqDIhVY1gqfVhWfzif5FGzFcyJBIs 7entWuK/ZZlfGx2h1DrjVRTrP4AhZE2SrPy6cVMQZ59MLqoE7MVKHP9GwS1802VvJgIL 5kQQC8zCdqGP65KUNLxLtiREyg18vFM9PAklHoh6fJIPpY2Rbq5njhnkdawhlH3wl6jd LsZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uJU0MhEan3K+DE/A5PlEKlyxFoVuzQvRh+DL4ZRXp7A=; b=W75JDnOGN1MujL+FtQ3ForhR6Op/uPVNVAlcsBT5N/B509lmjNW96zBo3DUgcPR+ft ONN4eYw9VP48AEVQRhMAuEBXDI3WWh1t3hsjDtmSy8P269v8dWsZ5XFWVj13S+lC6v0w 2MU7YtZAvDADN4hVP3IrXPe2Pa8YSdggM9JmXEAjnQhwcZVyQT7+FZAbSfraCIUdm7/X LDRMc8RtYrtNETnOBWYfn7bStG+V4iwbXFA1BGdK+/axKRd3T+uNeY0dNb84wm7rEQeh rSVfzLPex3roxbnZ/gnIJC6ynPVSXrXIUQ0zqgC7ZqjUMHciKeAlhih3c8XHQJqtx/+t 40tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVE6qUndqIvSw3Wmy8Uars+zHppDA5D6VuHERSP6RF2yb+ujGQ2y0CDYRApPxQ9oYZCmejmAn11SENmzQ== X-Received: by 10.159.35.12 with SMTP id 12mr4550723uae.119.1463605780470; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:09:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <87futf6tjj.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Artur Malabarba Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:09:30 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Paul Eggert Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113e45d2a2e53b0533244662 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: Mark Oteiza , 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a113e45d2a2e53b0533244662 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Should now be fixed on the emacs-25 branch. Please test if it works for you as well. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:43 PM Artur Malabarba wrote: > How do we run tests for a single file with the new test structure? I use > to call `make package-test` inside the test/automated directory. But I > can't seem to find an equivalent with the new structure. > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:43 PM Artur Malabarba > wrote: > >> Artur Malabarba writes: >> >> > I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. >> > Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you? >> >> Given the other information provided on this thread, I can indeed >> reproduce this now. I'll look into it. >> > --001a113e45d2a2e53b0533244662 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Should now be fixed on the emacs-25 branch. Please test if= it works for you as well.

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:43 PM Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com> wrote:
How do we run tests for a= single file with the new test structure? I use to call `make package-test`= inside the test/automated directory. But I can't seem to find an equiv= alent with the new structure.

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:43 PM Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:
Artur Malabarba <= bruce.connor= .am@gmail.com> writes:

> I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. > Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you?

Given the other information provided on this thread, I can indeed
reproduce this now. I'll look into it.
--001a113e45d2a2e53b0533244662-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 18:05:24 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 22:05:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b39am-0000Yf-5i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:05:24 -0400 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:44513) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b39ak-0000YS-4o for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:05:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D50B161339; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id Jz2R443jK0MO; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6026816133B; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:05:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ipSqH83QRgtg; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 466AE161339; Wed, 18 May 2016 15:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Artur Malabarba References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <87futf6tjj.fsf@gmail.com> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <030b362b-87ad-e4b5-8acf-69585db0c236@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 15:05:15 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: Mark Oteiza , 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) On 05/18/2016 02:09 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > Should now be fixed on the emacs-25 branch. Please test if it works=20 > for you as well. When I build emacs-25 now, it issues new warnings like the following.=20 What are these warnings symptoms of, and can the problem be avoided? ELC emacs-lisp/package.elc In package--check-signature: emacs-lisp/package.el:1248:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= url=E2=80=99 emacs-lisp/package.el:1248:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= b-sym=E2=80=99 In package--download-one-archive: emacs-lisp/package.el:1508:39:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= url=E2=80=99 emacs-lisp/package.el:1508:39:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= b-sym=E2=80=99 In package-install-from-archive: emacs-lisp/package.el:1806:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= url=E2=80=99 emacs-lisp/package.el:1806:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= b-sym=E2=80=99 In describe-package-1: emacs-lisp/package.el:2403:53:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= url=E2=80=99 emacs-lisp/package.el:2403:53:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= b-sym=E2=80=99 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 19:12:07 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 23:12:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57412 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b3AdL-00029k-JL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 19:12:07 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f52.google.com ([209.85.213.52]:36137) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b3AdJ-00029G-PW for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 19:12:06 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-f52.google.com with SMTP id y2so10651271vka.3 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:12:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DEzNfCzCrC8rCzQIMIlssv7I5QptDM0keuNSyigO2ZU=; b=bEFvyLkJ2oCDkymTrujP1YB6L1F4ny4iSDWMWwtvvLyCYhpu0PEeNuFLpWshZzOlLa f/7ZJEYUdepEiupojAFyezKVgEaCgQ6tJ8rV4I5RKLjZmSbJgo6OMxD2Jnb7jidwmi2a CO+PtGY3vZ8G8tFy6jzUyqJVPKw0LWJeZNzVhkK+iF+qiikhulsPtIa1yhBT0wCN3buK xpYsqpEOGzlQfX9v7Nz5fnOwflRobHrwiEq919KnjxMtYSkIU6Id6NghS1qHhRu8Cpz+ 3awQTfi1EhF0ZnrseKNtf7VsruroVDtl5zN10W1mO6b3Ald4Ou11S1UCQMAq6p+Lc9ma gEiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DEzNfCzCrC8rCzQIMIlssv7I5QptDM0keuNSyigO2ZU=; b=fQLNgTYqVzkAkh5HmvxIR1A1m+FW/tF/Dy5K47yFyCqNeZKHAnhFuJuNDChuUvJyPV Q+JHdUN0piTwCAlK9RzWfI4f3rEfj1gFpLdfm3rfeCmqTtaxmwzYCiEvABkjQbHSphIA eaOXC7QK8bIx9scgQaddB2n4b5SnjDBBUcVJ4U+5DBdDPj2JztgIwl79nGDJS9NhT/4M znkkVmr8f1r0+x4ybIo4yA+MVC7aIv10yd+Qz91aXLwgQwxe5dWEMKXbqEmQwlgKwj5T ty/DXKTNQEgf0wn0kSbxxuUZjGB+5tqUa/1jg4+BuydTGTp5IjYbY92NgiU1YCXWsrE+ tKeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXT+6/WeZgiDOL/tQP916fwCRo1VvM4G2BDqxqDJ7LjsayRS+ksrAqcvjRTmu6Stg1ubQgwYBQO/LHxeg== X-Received: by 10.159.54.232 with SMTP id p95mr4939757uap.107.1463613120035; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:12:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <87futf6tjj.fsf@gmail.com> <030b362b-87ad-e4b5-8acf-69585db0c236@cs.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: <030b362b-87ad-e4b5-8acf-69585db0c236@cs.ucla.edu> From: Artur Malabarba Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 23:11:50 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Paul Eggert Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c03c8501bc147053325fc64 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: Mark Oteiza , 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --94eb2c03c8501bc147053325fc64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just an unfortunate consequence of how macroexpand-let works. I've now fixed them by changing those 2 symbols to a plain let. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:05 PM Paul Eggert wrote: > On 05/18/2016 02:09 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > > Should now be fixed on the emacs-25 branch. Please test if it works > > for you as well. > > When I build emacs-25 now, it issues new warnings like the following. > What are these warnings symptoms of, and can the problem be avoided? > > > ELC emacs-lisp/package.elc > > In package--check-signature: > emacs-lisp/package.el:1248:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80= =98url=E2=80=99 > emacs-lisp/package.el:1248:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80= =98b-sym=E2=80=99 > > In package--download-one-archive: > emacs-lisp/package.el:1508:39:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80= =98url=E2=80=99 > emacs-lisp/package.el:1508:39:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80= =98b-sym=E2=80=99 > > In package-install-from-archive: > emacs-lisp/package.el:1806:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80= =98url=E2=80=99 > emacs-lisp/package.el:1806:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80= =98b-sym=E2=80=99 > > In describe-package-1: > emacs-lisp/package.el:2403:53:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80= =98url=E2=80=99 > emacs-lisp/package.el:2403:53:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80= =98b-sym=E2=80=99 > > --94eb2c03c8501bc147053325fc64 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just an unfortunate consequence of how macroexpand-let wor= ks. I've now fixed them by changing those 2 symbols to a plain let.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7= :05 PM Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla= .edu> wrote:
On 05/18/2016 0= 2:09 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote:
> Should now be fixed on the emacs-25 branch. Please test if it works > for you as well.

When I build emacs-25 now, it issues new warnings like the following.
What are these warnings symptoms of, and can the problem be avoided?


=C2=A0 =C2=A0ELC=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 emacs-lisp/package.elc

In package--check-signature:
emacs-lisp/package.el:1248:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= url=E2=80=99
emacs-lisp/package.el:1248:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= b-sym=E2=80=99

In package--download-one-archive:
emacs-lisp/package.el:1508:39:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= url=E2=80=99
emacs-lisp/package.el:1508:39:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= b-sym=E2=80=99

In package-install-from-archive:
emacs-lisp/package.el:1806:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= url=E2=80=99
emacs-lisp/package.el:1806:36:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= b-sym=E2=80=99

In describe-package-1:
emacs-lisp/package.el:2403:53:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= url=E2=80=99
emacs-lisp/package.el:2403:53:Warning: reference to free variable =E2=80=98= b-sym=E2=80=99

--94eb2c03c8501bc147053325fc64-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 18 21:30:26 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2016 01:30:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57460 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b3CnC-0005Lp-8W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 21:30:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48909) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b3CnB-0005Ld-FY for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 21:30:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b3Cn3-0005Uu-5L for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 21:30:20 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b3Cn3-0005Um-1y; Wed, 18 May 2016 21:30:17 -0400 Received: from du-a.org ([219.94.251.20]:38418 helo=localhost.localdomain) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b3Cn1-0003TE-4n; Wed, 18 May 2016 21:30:15 -0400 Message-ID: From: Daiki Ueno To: Artur Malabarba Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> <20160518164405.GA9932@holos.localdomain> <87vb2b6ufy.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2ir6u1b.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 10:30:08 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87k2ir6u1b.fsf@gmail.com> (Artur Malabarba's message of "Wed, 18 May 2016 16:33:04 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 Cc: Mark Oteiza , Paul Eggert , 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Artur Malabarba writes: > Here's a proposed fix. Thank you for taking a look at this, the patch looks good to me. > ;;;###autoload > @@ -1558,12 +1558,8 @@ package-refresh-contents > (let ((default-keyring (expand-file-name "package-keyring.gpg" > data-directory)) > (inhibit-message async)) > - (if (get 'package-check-signature 'saved-value) > - (when package-check-signature > - (epg-find-configuration 'OpenPGP)) > - (setq package-check-signature > - (if (epg-find-configuration 'OpenPGP) > - 'allow-unsigned))) > + (when package-check-signature > + (epg-find-configuration 'OpenPGP)) While it was from the original code, I would suggest to check the return value of `epg-find-configuration' or simply remove this `when' clause. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 19 02:12:56 2016 Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2016 06:12:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57556 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b3HCX-0003se-F9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2016 02:12:56 -0400 Received: from mail.lizzie.io ([192.241.221.211]:46482) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <_@lizzie.io>) id 1b3Fjw-0001Vz-95 for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2016 00:39:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:39:05 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lizzie.io; s=mail-lizzie-io; t=1463632750; bh=9gS9xw027e1neW0Mh3AHLrzAh8Zy0fRvJ6JUvHA0HAc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=G964bLTMLDIyGvSJZLd3SYamkB7AH/EOMYhNoXB/eovF1TC448gtt13cBSd4NtPi4 h7vzNb4l6M9GnRFVhQxlVySSo+JoOcOB/U0BaUEKJ85y1Hz6OVWp1dlSko4S3vaCtS 6EX98TVB8BNAfJH0j/YbloWBeeLCRjIZcyurMmr0= From: Lizzie Dixon <_@lizzie.io> To: Paul Eggert Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t Message-ID: <20160519043905.GA26569@empress> References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 May 2016 02:12:53 -0400 Cc: Mark Oteiza , 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Artur Malabarba , Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) On 05/15, Paul Eggert wrote: > Dmitry Gutov wrote: > > On 05/15/2016 10:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > > > >> package-check-signature t means check package signatures when installing, and do > >> not install a package if it is unsigned. Which is what is happening, right? > > > > Aren't packages coming from GNU ELPA supposed to all be signed? > > Sorry, I don't know. I don't even know how to determine whether that particular > package is signed. You can tell because http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/async-1.9.tar.sig exists. $ curl -O 'http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/async-1.9.tar' % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 61440 100 61440 0 0 98420 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 98304 $ curl -O 'http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/async-1.9.tar.sig' % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 96 100 96 0 0 254 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 253 $ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring /usr/share/emacs/25.0.93/etc/package-keyring.gpg --verify async-1.9.tar.sig gpg: assuming signed data in 'async-1.9.tar' gpg: Signature made Wed 18 May 2016 02:05:02 PM PDT using DSA key ID 7FBDEF9B gpg: Good signature from "GNU ELPA Signing Agent " [unknown] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: CA44 2C00 F917 74F1 7F59 D9B0 474F 0583 7FBD EF9B From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 19 11:16:05 2016 Received: (at 22440-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2016 15:16:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b3PgC-0001Ip-SH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2016 11:16:05 -0400 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:34400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b3PgA-0001I5-P6 for 22440-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2016 11:16:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5331E1612EC; Thu, 19 May 2016 08:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id rj8T3Z5qU7Wg; Thu, 19 May 2016 08:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A8E1612EB; Thu, 19 May 2016 08:15:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id VA3AB-mBKodU; Thu, 19 May 2016 08:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 886841612E7; Thu, 19 May 2016 08:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t To: Artur Malabarba References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <87futf6tjj.fsf@gmail.com> <030b362b-87ad-e4b5-8acf-69585db0c236@cs.ucla.edu> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <8f71950d-f539-243f-2717-9c7d4f6d5783@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 08:15:56 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22440-done Cc: Mark Oteiza , 22440-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) On 05/18/2016 04:11 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > Just an unfortunate consequence of how macroexpand-let works. I've now > fixed them by changing those 2 symbols to a plain let. Thanks for doing all that and for fixing the bug. Closing the bug report. From unknown Wed Aug 20 05:17:27 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator