GNU bug report logs -
#22414
24.5; GNUS - No such function: nnregistry-request-group
Previous Next
Reported by: Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:43:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo, wontfix
Found in version 24.5
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 22414 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 22414 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:43:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:43:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
While executing a function to do the following commands:
(gnus-summary-refer-references)
(gnus-summary-top-thread)
(gnus-summary-refer-thread)
I get the error:
"No such function: nnregistry-request-group
These commands are analogous to the keystrokes:
A R T o A T
in the Gnus *Summary* buffer
What is `nnregistry-request-group` and how does one debug this?
Thanks.
In GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.16.6)
of 2015-09-14 on buildvm-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Windowing system distributor `Fedora Project', version 11.0.11701000
Configured using:
`configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix=
--disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc
--datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var
--sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --with-dbus --with-gif --with-jpeg --with-png
--with-rsvg --with-tiff --with-xft --with-xpm --with-x-toolkit=gtk3
--with-gpm=no build_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
host_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu 'CFLAGS=-DMAIL_USE_LOCKF -O2 -g
-pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
-grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1
-m64 -mtune=generic' LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro'
Important settings:
value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8
value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=ibus
locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
Major mode: Article
Minor modes in effect:
tooltip-mode: t
electric-indent-mode: t
mouse-wheel-mode: t
tool-bar-mode: t
menu-bar-mode: t
file-name-shadow-mode: t
global-font-lock-mode: t
font-lock-mode: t
blink-cursor-mode: t
auto-composition-mode: t
auto-encryption-mode: t
auto-compression-mode: t
buffer-read-only: t
line-number-mode: t
transient-mark-mode: t
Recent messages:
Sorting threads...done
Generating summary...done
Auto-saving...done
Load-path shadows:
~/.emacs.d/lisp/ntlm hides /usr/share/emacs/24.5/lisp/net/ntlm
Features:
(shadow help-mode emacsbug sendmail mule-util sort smiley ansi-color
mail-extr gnus-async gnus-bcklg gnus-cite qp gnus-ml disp-table nndraft
nnmh nndoc utf-7 rfc2104 nnfolder nnimap utf7 parse-time netrc gnutls
network-stream starttls tls gnus-agent gnus-srvr gnus-score score-mode
nnvirtual gnus-msg gnus-art mm-uu mml2015 mm-view mml-smime smime dig
mailcap nntp gnus-cache epa-file epa derived epg epg-config auth-source
cl-macs eieio byte-opt bytecomp byte-compile cl-extra cconv eieio-core
cl gv sieve sieve-mode sieve-manage password-cache nnir gnus-bogofilter
gnus-sum nnoo gnus-group gnus-undo nnmail mail-source gnus-start
gnus-spec gnus-int gnus-range message format-spec rfc822 mml easymenu
mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045
ietf-drums mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader gnus-win gnus gnus-ems
nnheader gnus-util mail-utils mm-util help-fns mail-prsvr wid-edit
cl-loaddefs cl-lib time-date tooltip electric uniquify ediff-hook
vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel x-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image
regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment lisp-mode prog-mode register
page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock
font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang
misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew
greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese
case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer nadvice
loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay
sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget
hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process dbusbind
gfilenotify dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting
move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty emacs)
Memory information:
((conses 16 912398 47118)
(symbols 48 132422 8122)
(miscs 40 116 427)
(strings 32 109155 12117)
(string-bytes 1 4630744)
(vectors 16 25025)
(vector-slots 8 639432 11471)
(floats 8 233 979)
(intervals 56 50191 182)
(buffers 960 36)
(heap 1024 86089 57268))
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:32:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Live System User wrote:
> What is `nnregistry-request-group` and how does one debug this?
You could start by reading http://debbugs.gnu.org/13096,
although that never went anywhere.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Sun, 07 Feb 2016 05:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com> writes:
> While executing a function to do the following commands:
>
> (gnus-summary-refer-references)
> (gnus-summary-top-thread)
> (gnus-summary-refer-thread)
>
> I get the error:
>
> "No such function: nnregistry-request-group
Set debug-on-error, repeat the bug and post the backtrace.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:38:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #18 received at 22414-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Set debug-on-error, repeat the bug and post the backtrace.
No response in 10 months, closing.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 05 Jan 2017 12:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug unarchived.
Request was from
Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
I faced this issue recently too. I found the other bug too.
In my case it was triggered using sparse threads.
I think the issue is caused by having nnregistry in gnus-refer-article-methods.
In my case gnus-request-article-this-buffer tries to request the article doesn't find it in any other methods
and then tries to look in gnus-refer-article-methods.
Where it will hit nnregistry which is then called in gnus-check-group-server when it calls the inlined
gnus-get-function: ~(gnus-get-function gnus-command-method 'request-group)~.
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com> writes:
>
>> While executing a function to do the following commands:
>>
>> (gnus-summary-refer-references)
>> (gnus-summary-top-thread)
>> (gnus-summary-refer-thread)
>>
>> I get the error:
>>
>> "No such function: nnregistry-request-group
>
> Set debug-on-error, repeat the bug and post the backtrace.
My backtrace:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "No such function: nnregistry-request-group")
error("No such function: %s" nnregistry-request-group)
gnus-request-group("nnimap+thaodan.de:Emacs.Gnus" t)
gnus-check-group-server()
gnus-request-article-this-buffer(-2 "nnimap+thaodan.de:Emacs.Gnus")
gnus-article-prepare(-2 nil)
gnus-summary-display-article(-2 nil)
gnus-summary-select-article(nil nil pseudo)
gnus-summary-scroll-up(1)
funcall-interactively(gnus-summary-scroll-up 1)
command-execute(gnus-summary-scroll-up)
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 21 Jan 2025 23:45:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This patch should fix the issue I think. Please review.
[0001-Add-nnregistry-request-group-function-for-gnus-refer.patch (text/x-patch, inline)]
From a58d7a61e87370dfc86f470ccaac8c89e0ed04a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Bidar?= <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 01:28:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add nnregistry-request-group function for gnus-refer-article
* lisp/gnus/nnregistry.el (nnregistry-request-group): Add
function for gnus-check-group-server. nnregistry doesn't handle
any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
works as refer article method.
---
lisp/gnus/nnregistry.el | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lisp/gnus/nnregistry.el b/lisp/gnus/nnregistry.el
index edf773209d6..10363560ba6 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus/nnregistry.el
+++ b/lisp/gnus/nnregistry.el
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ nnregistry-status-message
(deffoo nnregistry-open-server (_server &optional _defs)
gnus-registry-db)
+(deffoo nnregistry-request-group (_group &optional _server _dont-check _info)
+ t)
+
(defvar nnregistry-within-nnregistry nil)
(deffoo nnregistry-request-article (id &optional _group _server buffer)
--
2.45.2
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Sat, 01 Feb 2025 11:40:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #31 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 01:43:57 +0200
> From: Björn Bidar via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>
> This patch should fix the issue I think. Please review.
Thanks. Could people who use Gnus please take a look and comment?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Mon, 03 Feb 2025 11:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #34 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 13:39:50 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
>> Cc: 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
>> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 01:43:57 +0200
>> From: Björn Bidar via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>>
>> This patch should fix the issue I think. Please review.
Eli> Thanks. Could people who use Gnus please take a look and comment?
Looks ok to me, although I donʼt use the Gnus registry. The commit
message could be clearer, though.
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Mon, 03 Feb 2025 11:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #37 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>> On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 13:39:50 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
>
> >> Cc: 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
> >> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 01:43:57 +0200
> >> From: Björn Bidar via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> >>
> >> This patch should fix the issue I think. Please review.
>
> Eli> Thanks. Could people who use Gnus please take a look and comment?
>
> Looks ok to me, although I donʼt use the Gnus registry. The commit
> message could be clearer, though.
How exactly?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Mon, 03 Feb 2025 12:20:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #40 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 13:57:20 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
Björn> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 13:39:50 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
>>
>> >> Cc: 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
>> >> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 01:43:57 +0200
>> >> From: Björn Bidar via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>> >>
>> >> This patch should fix the issue I think. Please review.
>>
Eli> Thanks. Could people who use Gnus please take a look and comment?
>>
>> Looks ok to me, although I donʼt use the Gnus registry. The commit
>> message could be clearer, though.
Björn> How exactly?
I guess you understand this sentence, but I donʼt:
nnregistry doesn't handle
any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
works as refer article method
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 04 Feb 2025 11:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #43 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>> On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 13:57:20 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
>
> Björn> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 13:39:50 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
> >>
> >> >> Cc: 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
> >> >> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 01:43:57 +0200
> >> >> From: Björn Bidar via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> >> >>
> >> >> This patch should fix the issue I think. Please review.
> >>
> Eli> Thanks. Could people who use Gnus please take a look and comment?
> >>
> >> Looks ok to me, although I donʼt use the Gnus registry. The commit
> >> message could be clearer, though.
>
> Björn> How exactly?
>
> I guess you understand this sentence, but I donʼt:
>
> nnregistry doesn't handle
> any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
> works as refer article method
>
What do you not understand about it? nnregistry doesn't handle servers
or groups so it needs the dummy function to pass through the
gnus-check-group-server function. If there's context missing check the
other functions in nnregistry.el.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 04 Feb 2025 12:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #46 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:43:13 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
Björn> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 13:57:20 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
>>
Björn> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 13:39:50 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
>> >>
>> >> >> Cc: 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
>> >> >> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 01:43:57 +0200
>> >> >> From: Björn Bidar via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> >> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This patch should fix the issue I think. Please review.
>> >>
Eli> Thanks. Could people who use Gnus please take a look and comment?
>> >>
>> >> Looks ok to me, although I donʼt use the Gnus registry. The commit
>> >> message could be clearer, though.
>>
Björn> How exactly?
>>
>> I guess you understand this sentence, but I donʼt:
>>
>> nnregistry doesn't handle
>> any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
>> works as refer article method
>>
Björn> What do you not understand about it? nnregistry doesn't handle servers
Björn> or groups so it needs the dummy function to pass through the
Björn> gnus-check-group-server function. If there's context missing check the
Björn> other functions in nnregistry.el.
So what I hope you mean is:
nnregistry doesnʼt actually handle servers or groups, however we need
to define a dummy function for it in order to satisfy the
gnus-check-group-server function.
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:12:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #49 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:43:13 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
>
> Björn> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >>>>>>> On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 13:57:20 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
> >>
> Björn> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >> >>>>>>> On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 13:39:50 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cc: 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Live System User <nyc4bos <at> aol.com>
> >> >> >> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 01:43:57 +0200
> >> >> >> From: Björn Bidar via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >> >> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This patch should fix the issue I think. Please review.
> >> >>
> Eli> Thanks. Could people who use Gnus please take a look and comment?
> >> >>
> >> >> Looks ok to me, although I donʼt use the Gnus registry. The commit
> >> >> message could be clearer, though.
> >>
> Björn> How exactly?
> >>
> >> I guess you understand this sentence, but I donʼt:
> >>
> >> nnregistry doesn't handle
> >> any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
> >> works as refer article method
> >>
>
> Björn> What do you not understand about it? nnregistry doesn't handle servers
> Björn> or groups so it needs the dummy function to pass through the
> Björn> gnus-check-group-server function. If there's context missing check the
> Björn> other functions in nnregistry.el.
>
> So what I hope you mean is:
>
> nnregistry doesnʼt actually handle servers or groups, however we need
> to define a dummy function for it in order to satisfy the
> gnus-check-group-server function.
>
> Robert
That does sound a little condescending to say you hope what I am saying.
I'm not a native speaker but I think I can speak well enough to be
understandable.
Yes that is essentially what I'm trying to say but I want to highlight
that you take the sentence out of context. The full message was:
Add function for gnus-check-group-server. nnregistry doesn't handle
any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
works as refer article method.
Did you read the first sentence? Maybe it should have been:
Add function for gnus-check-group-server function. nnregistry doesn't handle
any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
works as refer article method.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 04 Feb 2025 14:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #52 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 15:11:05 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
>>
>> So what I hope you mean is:
>>
>> nnregistry doesnʼt actually handle servers or groups, however we need
>> to define a dummy function for it in order to satisfy the
>> gnus-check-group-server function.
>>
>> Robert
Björn> That does sound a little condescending to say you hope what
Björn> I am saying.
It was not intended that way, I was trying to express what I
understood.
Björn> I'm not a native speaker but I think I can speak well enough to be
Björn> understandable.
Björn> Yes that is essentially what I'm trying to say but I want to highlight
Björn> that you take the sentence out of context. The full message was:
Björn> Add function for gnus-check-group-server. nnregistry doesn't handle
Björn> any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
Björn> works as refer article method.
Björn> Did you read the first sentence? Maybe it should have been:
Björn> Add function for gnus-check-group-server function. nnregistry doesn't handle
Björn> any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
Björn> works as refer article method.
My difficulty is because this bit: "nnregistry doesn't handle any
servers or groups" runs into this bit: "define the dummy function so
Gnus-registry works as refer article method" without any intervening
junction phrase like "so we must" or similar.
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 04 Feb 2025 16:10:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #55 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 15:11:05 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
> >>
> >> So what I hope you mean is:
> >>
> >> nnregistry doesnʼt actually handle servers or groups, however we need
> >> to define a dummy function for it in order to satisfy the
> >> gnus-check-group-server function.
> >>
> >> Robert
>
> Björn> That does sound a little condescending to say you hope what
> Björn> I am saying.
>
> It was not intended that way, I was trying to express what I
> understood.
OK np.
>
> Björn> I'm not a native speaker but I think I can speak well enough to be
> Björn> understandable.
> Björn> Yes that is essentially what I'm trying to say but I want to highlight
> Björn> that you take the sentence out of context. The full message was:
>
> Björn> Add function for gnus-check-group-server. nnregistry doesn't handle
> Björn> any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
> Björn> works as refer article method.
>
> Björn> Did you read the first sentence? Maybe it should have been:
>
> Björn> Add function for gnus-check-group-server function. nnregistry doesn't handle
> Björn> any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
> Björn> works as refer article method.
>
> My difficulty is because this bit: "nnregistry doesn't handle any
> servers or groups" runs into this bit: "define the dummy function so
> Gnus-registry works as refer article method" without any intervening
> junction phrase like "so we must" or similar.
Ah! Ok that makes your point much easier to get. That a connecting
phrase or word was needed was not obvious to me.
Please check the patch below:
[0001-Add-nnregistry-request-group-function-for-gnus-refer.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 04 Feb 2025 16:31:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #58 received at 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 18:09:36 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
Björn> * lisp/gnus/nnregistry.el (nnregistry-request-group):
Björn> nnregistry doesn't handle any servers or groups; however we have to
Björn> define the dummy function so Gnus-registry works as refer article
Björn> method, as the `gnus-check-group-server' function requires it.
Björn> The latter function is called when referring to articles to check the
Björn> source group first before actually requesting any articles.
Björn> ---
Björn> lisp/gnus/nnregistry.el | 3 +++
Björn> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Thatʼs much better, thanks
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#22414
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Sat, 08 Feb 2025 09:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #61 received at 22414-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Eric Abrahamsen
> <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>, 22414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org,
> nyc4bos <at> aol.com
> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 18:09:36 +0200
>
> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> >>>>>> On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 15:11:05 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
> > >>
> > >> So what I hope you mean is:
> > >>
> > >> nnregistry doesnʼt actually handle servers or groups, however we need
> > >> to define a dummy function for it in order to satisfy the
> > >> gnus-check-group-server function.
> > >>
> > >> Robert
> >
> > Björn> That does sound a little condescending to say you hope what
> > Björn> I am saying.
> >
> > It was not intended that way, I was trying to express what I
> > understood.
>
> OK np.
>
> >
> > Björn> I'm not a native speaker but I think I can speak well enough to be
> > Björn> understandable.
> > Björn> Yes that is essentially what I'm trying to say but I want to highlight
> > Björn> that you take the sentence out of context. The full message was:
> >
> > Björn> Add function for gnus-check-group-server. nnregistry doesn't handle
> > Björn> any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
> > Björn> works as refer article method.
> >
> > Björn> Did you read the first sentence? Maybe it should have been:
> >
> > Björn> Add function for gnus-check-group-server function. nnregistry doesn't handle
> > Björn> any servers or groups define the dummy function so Gnus-registry
> > Björn> works as refer article method.
> >
> > My difficulty is because this bit: "nnregistry doesn't handle any
> > servers or groups" runs into this bit: "define the dummy function so
> > Gnus-registry works as refer article method" without any intervening
> > junction phrase like "so we must" or similar.
>
> Ah! Ok that makes your point much easier to get. That a connecting
> phrase or word was needed was not obvious to me.
>
> Please check the patch below:
Installed on master, and closing the bug, thanks.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 08 Mar 2025 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 105 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.