GNU bug report logs - #22396
support for single-request

Previous Next

Package: adns;

Reported by: Eugene Yunak <eugene <at> yunak.eu>

Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:50:02 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 22396 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to adns-discuss <at> chiark.greenend.org.uk:
bug#22396; Package adns. (Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:50:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eugene Yunak <eugene <at> yunak.eu>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to adns-discuss <at> chiark.greenend.org.uk. (Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:50:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eugene Yunak <eugene <at> yunak.eu>
To: submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: support for single-request
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:29:44 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: adns

It appears adns does not recognize and support the `single-request`
option from resolv.conf, here's the relevant error message:

adns: /etc/resolv.conf:2: unknown option `single-request'

Cheers,
Eugene

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Information forwarded to adns-discuss <at> chiark.greenend.org.uk:
bug#22396; Package adns. (Fri, 12 Aug 2016 21:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 22396 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson <at> chiark.greenend.org.uk>
To: Eugene Yunak <eugene <at> yunak.eu>
Cc: 22396 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22396: support for single-request
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 22:02:58 +0100
Eugene Yunak writes ("bug#22396: support for single-request"):
> Package: adns
> 
> It appears adns does not recognize and support the `single-request`
> option from resolv.conf, here's the relevant error message:
> 
> adns: /etc/resolv.conf:2: unknown option `single-request'

Indeed it doesn't.  I'm afraid I don't have time right now to
implement this.  I have some bugfixes that I ought to have released
some time ago...

In the meantime I suggest using a local caching resolver.  This is
better for caching etc. anyway.

Ian.




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 311 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.