GNU bug report logs - #22371
test/ls/stat-free-color.sh

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#22371: closed (test/ls/stat-free-color.sh)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:34:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:33:37 +0000
with message-id <56977981.8030801 <at> draigBrady.com>
and subject line Re: bug#22371: test/ls/stat-free-color.sh
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #22371,
regarding test/ls/stat-free-color.sh
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
22371: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22371
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: sam razavi <sam.razavi6 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: test/ls/stat-free-color.sh
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:10:39 +0330

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

in developing Linux From Scratch for checking test suite i run this command:
"make RUN_EXPENSIVE_TESTS=yes check" and then i found failure by this
verbose:
"FAILED: test/ls/stat-free-color.sh"

and at last it shows two error, i'll be merciful to guide me about this
problem.

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[LFS problem.png (image/png, attachment)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: sam razavi <sam.razavi6 <at> gmail.com>, 22371-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22371: test/ls/stat-free-color.sh
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:33:37 +0000

On 14/01/16 09:40, sam razavi wrote:
> in developing Linux From Scratch for checking test suite i run this command:
> "make RUN_EXPENSIVE_TESTS=yes check" and then i found failure by this verbose:
> "FAILED: test/ls/stat-free-color.sh"
> 
> and at last it shows two error, i'll be merciful to guide me about this problem.  

I think this may be a performance issue with your glibc,
which is fixed in newer version and worked around in coreutils tests with:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=v8.24-13-gfd5f2b1

thanks,
Pádraig

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.