From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 08 02:31:40 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2016 07:31:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42193 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHRWO-000462-J7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:31:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHRWM-00045l-RK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:31:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHRWH-0000uR-2y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:31:33 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHRWG-0000uN-Vo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:31:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHRWG-0005SD-4p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:31:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHRWC-0000u6-Vu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:31:32 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]:36140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHRWC-0000tw-Qc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:31:28 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id e32so256836949qgf.3 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:31:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=EUZqUw22HoKsgyr1bLWiMR+TxzfYDd4BWNBQ+9gQ7FI=; b=xPukp9zBe05vZ4ri8G6c8pncr5R7flwmsCFSO5Qh/S4Y+YhSoxpmjOZdOrBSeCaNF0 G4iX7xUGxGzkqvCcvD3+L6y/W0G8M6Egcy9kgePgCKuXFFiIV1G9iOndYAvU9CCn3Sl5 4n8xvB8Keu7wCNkXHjBlwK20hLH6y20eSzb8a503+ZJDsBhNYYdqERVxZZkemzD9vjAG Tqqbs+xALa2WqLuGw8NsX7kw1javMeSrrhKel3r/euHGmjBtfTbR5SAD3q21I336BI/k L9CnZbSbf/Y4HpbPP5Wr80xYzCZpIKdAAoUz/5PZiYcOJNc6HEztH9U6waCaAaI7/OiA nktg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=EUZqUw22HoKsgyr1bLWiMR+TxzfYDd4BWNBQ+9gQ7FI=; b=bYxZYZ98RRYC078tkpAhYqOdTe7Ixlfx1gE8PE8m8POLi7hKtXCyEHhQqPF2VotdXb xkHcoth4pLfr6fMmDOGuQdvPhhqZIxgNj7u104CWjBxMcB7cU15rrtM2u/TU4cPK2B+l zN0EmHC2SaOOK9+v6FaNoh9oRfbvFGdMxrGhCxUlQpTUArLW7Hj50eLrKxANWHKsc/t8 SIw7y6jhy+4vVJW93EOwVFaQAbyU5nPwF786WbP7s7iVKKUi1sTL1S9uf6A3/2EvDRHO 76vmgAKjA6rvWuq4qlrPFc0Bphij+wWhnnLf5hcay1yWlOQgayjDZJK5u7NHoy/3yVrJ U1CA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnye0onJtcTtFDWM1xgJCRF4hcQGfjgqEWBYgAdZBf6iUXbUpdn3KU46zV2ivx1X3iBUBUmAg9lEfxtiVfp+0EsheYG3w== X-Received: by 10.140.135.16 with SMTP id 16mr116167224qhh.79.1452238287863; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:31:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-96-227-83-242.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [96.227.83.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g130sm48133264qkb.28.2016.01.07.23.31.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:31:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C5344685BE; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 02:31:25 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Oteiza To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.1.50; eww-list-bookmarks width Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:31:25 -0500 Message-ID: <87vb745xyq.fsf@udel.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) eww-list-bookmarks uses the width of the current window to decide how it will format the buffer without knowing how the window will be split. This ends up looking poor when emacs decides to split horizontally. For instance, this happens with a 177x41 emacs. I think eww should either prescribe a fixed format, or display the buffer before calculating width. man.el used to have this problem, and solved it via the latter (Man-start-calling). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 00:11:26 2016 Received: (at 22328) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2016 05:11:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58716 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRCCT-0007pC-Vs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:11:26 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56854) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRCCS-0007p4-IO for 22328@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:11:24 -0500 Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aRCC5-0007hB-WF; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:11:02 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Mark Oteiza Subject: Re: bug#22328: 25.1.50; eww-list-bookmarks width References: <87vb745xyq.fsf@udel.edu> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:10:57 +1100 In-Reply-To: <87vb745xyq.fsf@udel.edu> (Mark Oteiza's message of "Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:31:25 -0500") Message-ID: <87y4b112n2.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1aRCC5-0007hB-WF X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455167462.74084@4Im4GvIzsLSUvAGBKbIHqA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22328 Cc: 22328@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Mark Oteiza writes: > eww-list-bookmarks uses the width of the current window to decide how it > will format the buffer without knowing how the window will be > split. This ends up looking poor when emacs decides to split horizontally. > For instance, this happens with a 177x41 emacs. > > I think eww should either prescribe a fixed format, or display the > buffer before calculating width. man.el used to have this problem, and > solved it via the latter (Man-start-calling). I've done the latter. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 00:11:33 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2016 05:11:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRCCb-0007pW-6h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:11:33 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56860) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRCCa-0007pP-6m for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:11:32 -0500 Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aRCCD-0007hu-4t for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:11:09 +0100 Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:11:05 +1100 Message-Id: <87wpql12mu.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #22328 X-MailScanner-ID: 1aRCCD-0007hu-4t X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455167470.87293@FL0oDhKiv9CYwO9LT7ZIiw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) tags 22328 fixed close 22328 25.1 From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:25:03 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator