From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:53:11 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#22305 <22305@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#22305 <22305@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.5; permanent 100% CPU load for no apparent reason Reply-To: bug#22305 <22305@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:53:11 +0000 retitle 22305 24.5; permanent 100% CPU load for no apparent reason reassign 22305 emacs submitter 22305 "Roland Winkler" severity 22305 normal tag 22305 moreinfo wontfix thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 04 11:48:32 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2016 16:48:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8J6-0007I5-3H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:48:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8J5-0007Ht-4t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:48:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8Iz-0004sT-5p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:48:25 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58611) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8Iz-0004sK-37 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:48:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8Iy-0008Qb-BH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:48:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8Ix-0004s6-Ga for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:48:24 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8Ix-0004s2-DG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:48:23 -0500 Received: from [2602:30a:2e52:d720:9665:9cff:fe91:d124] (port=35592 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8Iw-0002Vw-UW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:48:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <41538.98876.177125.22154@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:48:02 -0600 From: "Roland Winkler" To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.5; permanent 100% CPU load for no apparent reason X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Lately emacs gives me some strange problem, where according to `top' the CPU load due to the emacs process goes up to a permanent value of 100% (and I notice this because the laptop fan starts spinning loudly), whereas according to `ps' the emacs process continues to give rise to only a marginal CPU load. While this happens, emacs responds normally, so it appears that emacs is not trying to do anything unusual in the background. I did not have this problem while I was using emacs 24.5 under ubuntu 14.04. It only appeared lately when I upgraded to a new laptop running ubuntu 15.10. I am not aware of any significant change in my emacs configuration since I made this switch. What can I do to pin this down further? So far, I have not noticed anything that triggers this behavior reproducibly and my workaround has been to restart emacs. But that's not nice for a recurring problem (about once per day). In GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.16.7) of 2015-11-24 on regnitz Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11702000 System Description: Ubuntu 15.10 Important settings: value of $LC_COLLATE: C value of $LANG: en_US.utf8 value of $XMODIFIERS: locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 04 12:16:52 2016 Received: (at 22305) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2016 17:16:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37793 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8kW-0007zb-Je for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:16:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8kV-0007zP-Id for 22305@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:16:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8kN-0004tt-90 for 22305@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:16:46 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8kN-0004to-5p for 22305@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:16:43 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3202 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8kM-0003Fl-DQ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:16:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:16:46 +0200 Message-Id: <834met6z9d.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Roland Winkler" In-reply-to: <41538.98876.177125.22154@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (winkler@gnu.org) Subject: Re: bug#22305: 24.5; permanent 100% CPU load for no apparent reason References: <41538.98876.177125.22154@gargle.gargle.HOWL> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22305 Cc: 22305@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:48:02 -0600 > From: "Roland Winkler" > > Lately emacs gives me some strange problem, where according to `top' > the CPU load due to the emacs process goes up to a permanent value > of 100% (and I notice this because the laptop fan starts spinning > loudly), whereas according to `ps' the emacs process continues to > give rise to only a marginal CPU load. While this happens, emacs > responds normally, so it appears that emacs is not trying to do > anything unusual in the background. Not necessarily. AFAIR, 'top' shows the CPU usage of each program in terms of processor execution units. IOW, 100% means Emacs is pegging a single execution unit. How many execution units (cores) do you have on that system? > What can I do to pin this down further? So far, I have not noticed > anything that triggers this behavior reproducibly and my workaround > has been to restart emacs. But that's not nice for a recurring > problem (about once per day). When this happens, attach a debugger and show us the backtrace, including the Lisp backtrace. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 04 12:47:54 2016 Received: (at 22305) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2016 17:47:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37808 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9EY-0000JX-L8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:47:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48383) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9EX-0000JL-9n for 22305@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:47:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9ER-0002d1-0h for 22305@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:47:48 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9EQ-0002cv-U6 for 22305@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:47:46 -0500 Received: from [2602:30a:2e52:d720:9665:9cff:fe91:d124] (port=37262 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9EQ-00030n-B1; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:47:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <45120.46680.905339.22154@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:47:44 -0600 From: "Roland Winkler" To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#22305: 24.5; permanent 100% CPU load for no apparent reason In-Reply-To: <834met6z9d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <41538.98876.177125.22154@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <834met6z9d.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22305 Cc: 22305@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) On Mon Jan 4 2016 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Not necessarily. AFAIR, 'top' shows the CPU usage of each program > in terms of processor execution units. IOW, 100% means Emacs is > pegging a single execution unit. Sure. My point is that normally `top' says that my emacs session does not take more than 2 or 3% CPU load. Yet suddenly this goes up to 100% and the fan starts running loudly, too. > How many execution units (cores) do you have on that system? `lshw' says Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5600U CPU @ 2.60GHz which, I believe, comes with four cores. > When this happens, attach a debugger and show us the backtrace, > including the Lisp backtrace. Thanks, will do that. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 04 13:33:21 2016 Received: (at 22305) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2016 18:33:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37834 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9wX-0001PI-9y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:33:21 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:62453) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9wV-0001P5-Rb for 22305@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:33:20 -0500 Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.3.9]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LopiJ-1Ziinr2tid-00gnqA; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:33:13 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#22305: 24.5; permanent 100% CPU load for no apparent reason References: <41538.98876.177125.22154@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <834met6z9d.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:33:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <834met6z9d.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:16:46 +0200") Message-ID: <87h9it9ouz.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Smk779iDtKipZH9WQckOt0b7kHq/m6/WpN6UbtlMsR0ITexDpDo 9w+CEs9r7UvL4Ym/E+q3Rf1CiEJlZAgfmBzL0IPo4atG0SQtVy9s0rxnz55tSqInTzildL4 Y3ffgw+evt1brlZjdDiGbLfcsdUdOko7GkL8j9Ywm3aR4/HO1b+W+rk0agpkueRo18QcTDf t+4oKrnYsU0sN6ixZH7qw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:qFudPvSBtks=:xJYJEZT5ffPMM4tV/YS8Gr So9mdaJGeJaLW8BiINCxwUgakKESXyg5ydtAWZ/8ADPkRV42ljtKgfD9hpUpsEKepCuaqXLTv D3cY3hyvxFBgal5iLo+6NbGhSB+B+7NGDh076+qOwn3GLJo2LpAb1mjgbofJ1mCZeNel9Eauu pKTCzPMuKtfVGoBOOeipXElf5wjD2s52Xfhe25IHuZFwrEX9rOiGzQqXeMPmOcKt9oEo5oQfR qPwdyT2CJmj1gOif4jMQr3scYF/BZXqJoRFMOU+W0eSRQ5TfH40xNOanvxNrf7aE9DocswwQX 0pEiGpo+ypKTx1vjuQ0lUHojbEZ6aSzfBHeBgPBztSFuS7wUCiIUH+OYML8D2VmLXGi2BaUP1 cfYhopDHPA4Nyd4jo/Z8FEWhPCvn3GS0Hvf9NURalVEE+xJerFqE2EklWtrOsqfPqF/GS0irM lUXp6PGJHWWx+OaCwECksYFOFqWI0/26yAXKqDBSIdBSmDlAXmwNo1z0Q38Dhig1mqdns5baj kOtoFigqBDbM2CLhIbaAJeKhYDcU93pGiqUfp0cRoO6+cu69QderVuEf22CDrPEI05L1+O01b ctppho/zB/+crTcrz+F00x9lURFNos2bGpe0pVlfXwOoeREn/IFkoaKbyZwXzupbyxYNP7zGQ lBnizmS49WqpBcwKHsI/9sWkC5WcYCaVSGtp5vpqxntT1K049zbG/WJ3nlnIljW34+JRVif4j W1VU45y7JruGsBhHk/OycnSALv3whMoY7gvTBcyAw0+Y3HFa72XjLpsEPpTOJPx4ljBOknagW JodpYFr X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22305 Cc: Roland Winkler , 22305@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > When this happens, attach a debugger and show us the backtrace, > including the Lisp backtrace. Using profiler.el might also reveal what Emacs is doing. Michael. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 07 13:57:32 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 18:57:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhPH-00057j-6N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhPG-00057P-JX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhPA-0003ok-T7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:25 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhPA-0003og-Pm for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:24 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhPA-0003rQ-EQ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:24 -0500 Subject: control message for bug 22305 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:24 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) tag 22305 + wontfix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 07 13:57:26 2016 Received: (at 22305-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 18:57:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59690 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhPB-00057Q-W8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42980) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhP9-00057A-U5 for 22305-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhP4-0003lU-7m for 22305-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:18 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhP4-0003lK-4w for 22305-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:18 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cEhP3-0003fZ-F0; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:17 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 22305-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#22305: 24.5; permanent 100% CPU load for no apparent reason References: <41538.98876.177125.22154@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <834met6z9d.fsf@gnu.org> <45120.46680.905339.22154@gargle.gargle.HOWL> X-Spook: Outbreak quiche Communications infrastructure X-Ran: ?.{m4]T_r#c1=O/os7knpAlV~-wv*t2wR6Lo9/.(l&10j_jJ?E4uuE9TPs{vet#rCi9h1< X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:57:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <45120.46680.905339.22154@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Roland Winkler's message of "Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:47:44 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22305-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) Since the best part of a year has passed with no further information, I'm closing this. Please reopen if you can provide the requested information. From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:53:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator