GNU bug report logs - #22300
25.1.50; Dired -- renaming folders/files to CamelCase/UPPERCASE/lowercase.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Keith David Bershatsky <esq <at> lawlist.com>

Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 20:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 24441

Found in versions 24.5, 25.1.50

Fixed in version 26.1

Done: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #32 received at 22300 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 22300 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jwiegley <at> gmail.com, esq <at> lawlist.com
Subject: Re: bug#22300: 25.1.50;
 Dired -- renaming folders/files to CamelCase/UPPERCASE/lowercase.
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:44:37 +0200
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:47:32 -0800 (PST)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: 22300-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Hm.  I'm curious.  How do we know that this is not an Emacs bug?

Because we can step through the code, or just plain read it ;-)

> I do not understand why this is his error msg:
> 
>     Move '/Users/HOME/Desktop/FOO' to '/Users/HOME/Desktop/foo/FOO' failed:
>                               ^^^                          ^^^^^^^
>       (file-error Renaming Invalid argument 
>        /Users/HOME/Desktop/FOO/Users/HOME/Desktop/foo/FOO)
> 
> That looks peculiar, if all he did was hit `R' on a directory name.
> That message seems to be saying that Emacs asked the OS to move
> directory .../FOO to .../foo/FOO.  That doesn't seem like the right
> thing for Emacs to do.  Seems like Emacs should have asked the OS
> to move .../FOO to .../foo (without the trailing /FOO).

Would you still think that if the arguments were changed as below?

  Move '/Users/HOME/Desktop/FOO' to '/Users/HOME/Desktop/bar/FOO'

> Am I missing something?

Yes, you are:

  . The filesystem in question is evidently case-insensitive, so Emacs
    thinks the user wants to move a directory into another _existing_
    directory ('foo' exists because 'FOO' does)

  . When the target is an existing directory, rename-file _always_
    behaves like shown above (which is actually what the user should
    expect, don't you agree?)

  . See my other message




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 60 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.