GNU bug report logs -
#22241
25.0.50; etags Ruby parser problems
Previous Next
Reported by: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 04:00:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 25.0.50
Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 4 Feb 2016 23:06:47 +0300
with message-id <56B3AF57.5020102 <at> yandex.ru>
and subject line Re: bug#22241: 25.0.50; etags Ruby parser problems
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #22241,
regarding 25.0.50; etags Ruby parser problems
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
22241: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22241
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.5 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.16.7).
It's great that we've incorporated some Ruby support, but it has some
apparent problems:
- Constants are not indexed.
- Class methods (def self.foo) are given the wrong name ("self."
shouldn't be included).
- "class << self" blocks are given a separate entry.
- Qualified tag names are never generated.
Take this example file:
module A
class B
ABC = 4
def foo!
end
def self._bar?(abc)
end
class << self
def qux=(tee)
end
end
end
end
It should have this unqualified index:
A
B
ABC
foo!
_bar?
qux=
And the qualified names should look like this:
A
A::B
A::B::ABC
A::B#foo!
A::B.bar?
A::B.qux=
Lastly, it would be great if the parser recognized some built-in
code-generating methods. Example:
def A
attr_reader :foo
attr_writer :bar
attr_accessor :tee
alias_method :qux, :tee
end
should become (the unqualified version):
A
foo
bar=
tee
tee=
qux
All attr_* methods can take a variable number of arguments. The parser
should take each argument, check that it's a symbol and not a variable
(starts with :), and if so, record the corresponding method name.
Thanks!
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
On 02/04/2016 08:24 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Just skip it as well.
>
> Done.
Thanks a lot, marking this as done.
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 162 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.