GNU bug report logs - #2224
[PATCH] add-log.el: Modularize add-log-current-defun, new types supported

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto <at> cante.net>

Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:50:03 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 2224 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jari Aalto <jari.aalto <at> cante.net>
Subject: bug#2224: [PATCH] add-log.el: Modularize add-log-current-defun, new types supported
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:11:47 -0400
>>>> (add-log-current-defun-type-javascript-like): New function.
>>>> (add-log-current-defun-type-shell-bourne-like): New function.
>>>> (add-log-current-defun-type-makefile-like): New function.
>>>> (add-log-current-defun-type-text-asciidoc-like): New function.
>>>> (add-log-current-defun-type-default): New function.
> [...]
>> Having them be separate functions is indeed very good.  But most of them
>> shouldn't be in add-log.el: they should be in their respective
>> major-mode instead.
> You mean just define `add-log-current-defun-type-javascript' in js.el,
> and stuff?  Doesn't that seem kinda...  I don't know.  Error-prone?

I thought you were going to say "Obvious?".

Think about it: why should add-log support be different than say,
font-lock, outline, imenu, younameit?  Oh and BTW, this same function
can/should be used for which-func-mode.

Of course in js.el it shouldn't be called
`add-log-current-defun-type-javascript' but `js--current-defun-name' or
something like that.

> Because add-log (in the patch) has a major cond up there that will call
> the functions unconditionally if there's a match with the mode (and
> other things), so there's potential for things getting out of sync if
> people are using different versions of (say) js.el that doesn't define
> the function in question...

We had the same problem when we moved the font-lock defs away from
font-lock.el.  Yes, it's a problem.  No, it's not insurmountable.


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 234 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.