GNU bug report logs -
#22210
25.0.50; display-message-or-buffer docstring refers to wrong argument in display-buffer
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 22210 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 22210 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22210
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Sebastian Wiesner <swiesner <at> lunaryorn.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
The docstring of `display-message-or-buffer' reads as follows:
----
(display-message-or-buffer MESSAGE &optional BUFFER-NAME NOT-THIS-WINDOW FRAME)
[…]
Optional arguments NOT-THIS-WINDOW and FRAME are as for ‘display-buffer’,
and only used if a buffer is displayed.
----
However, display-buffer does not actually have a NOT-THIS-WINDOW argument:
(display-buffer BUFFER-OR-NAME &optional ACTION FRAME)
The source of display-message-or-buffer reveals that NOT-THIS-WINDOW is actually
passed in the ACTION argument.
I think the argument of display-message-or-buffer should be renamed to ACTION
as well. Currently it's pretty confusing and may lead to wrong guesses about
the semantics of this argument.
Greetings,
Sebastian
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Sebastian Wiesner <swiesner <at> lunaryorn.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 22210-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Sebastian Wiesner <swiesner <at> lunaryorn.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:15:56 +0100
>
> The docstring of `display-message-or-buffer' reads as follows:
>
> ----
>
> (display-message-or-buffer MESSAGE &optional BUFFER-NAME NOT-THIS-WINDOW FRAME)
>
> […]
>
> Optional arguments NOT-THIS-WINDOW and FRAME are as for ‘display-buffer’,
> and only used if a buffer is displayed.
>
> ----
>
> However, display-buffer does not actually have a NOT-THIS-WINDOW argument:
>
> (display-buffer BUFFER-OR-NAME &optional ACTION FRAME)
>
> The source of display-message-or-buffer reveals that NOT-THIS-WINDOW is actually
> passed in the ACTION argument.
>
> I think the argument of display-message-or-buffer should be renamed to ACTION
> as well.
Thanks, fixed.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22210
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:41:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 22210-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am 19.12.2015 um 12:35 schrieb Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
>> From: Sebastian Wiesner <swiesner <at> lunaryorn.com>
>> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:15:56 +0100
>>
>> The docstring of `display-message-or-buffer' reads as follows:
>>
>> ----
>>
>> (display-message-or-buffer MESSAGE &optional BUFFER-NAME NOT-THIS-WINDOW FRAME)
>>
>> […]
>>
>> Optional arguments NOT-THIS-WINDOW and FRAME are as for ‘display-buffer’,
>> and only used if a buffer is displayed.
>>
>> ----
>>
>> However, display-buffer does not actually have a NOT-THIS-WINDOW argument:
>>
>> (display-buffer BUFFER-OR-NAME &optional ACTION FRAME)
>>
>> The source of display-message-or-buffer reveals that NOT-THIS-WINDOW is actually
>> passed in the ACTION argument.
>>
>> I think the argument of display-message-or-buffer should be renamed to ACTION
>> as well.
>
> Thanks, fixed.
Thank you for the quick fix. Besides, I noticed that the same issue is also in the Emacs Lisp reference.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22210
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 19 Dec 2015 12:22:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 22210 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Sebastian Wiesner <swiesner <at> lunaryorn.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 12:40:28 +0100
> Cc: 22210-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Besides, I noticed that the same issue is also in the Emacs Lisp
> reference.
Fixed as well, although it'd be better to say those things together to
begin with.
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22210
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:27:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 22210 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am 19.12.2015 um 13:21 schrieb Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
>> From: Sebastian Wiesner <swiesner <at> lunaryorn.com>
>> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 12:40:28 +0100
>> Cc: 22210-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> Besides, I noticed that the same issue is also in the Emacs Lisp
>> reference.
>
> Fixed as well, although it'd be better to say those things together to
> begin with.
>
> Thanks.
I'm sorry but I didn't notice that until after you had closed the bug. I didn't think of the
manual until now. I apologise for having sent an incomplete bug report.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22210
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 22210 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Sebastian Wiesner <swiesner <at> lunaryorn.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:25:51 +0100
> Cc: 22210 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > Fixed as well, although it'd be better to say those things together to
> > begin with.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I'm sorry but I didn't notice that until after you had closed the bug. I didn't think of the
> manual until now. I apologise for having sent an incomplete bug report.
No apology needed; mistakes do happen.
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22210
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 20 Dec 2015 00:05:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 22210 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am 19.12.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
>> From: Sebastian Wiesner <swiesner <at> lunaryorn.com>
>> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:25:51 +0100
>> Cc: 22210 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>>> Fixed as well, although it'd be better to say those things together to
>>> begin with.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> I'm sorry but I didn't notice that until after you had closed the bug. I didn't think of the
>> manual until now. I apologise for having sent an incomplete bug report.
>
> No apology needed; mistakes do happen.
>
> Thanks.
Thank you, for fixing this issue so quickly, and for your great work on Emacs.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22210
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 20 Dec 2015 00:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 22210 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> Sebastian Wiesner <swiesner <at> lunaryorn.com> writes:
> Thank you, for fixing this issue so quickly, and for your great work on
> Emacs.
A thanks Eli much deserves; I continue to become more and more aware of his
commitment and service to this community. So, accept my +1 here as well.
Nice to see you here too, Sebastian! It warms my heart to find your name in my
mailbox of core Emacs stuff. :)
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 17 Jan 2016 12:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 234 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.