GNU bug report logs - #22207
emacs-25 mishandles info code text on Fedora 23

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#19889: closed (tex-verbatim face: don't specify :family?)
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 20:50:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2016 13:48:50 -0700
with message-id <951925e4-e3ed-0367-721a-7241546f4013 <at> cs.ucla.edu>
and subject line Re: emacs-25 mishandles info code text on Fedora 23
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #22207,
regarding tex-verbatim face: don't specify :family?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
22207: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22207
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: tex-verbatim face: don't specify :family?
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0500

Package: emacs
Version: 24.4
Severity: minor

The tex-verbatim face is defined as

   '((t :family "courier"))

Is this a good idea?

AFAICS, it is the only face definition in Emacs that specifies a :family.
It seems to cause problems on some systems, see:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684797


For me on RHEL7, that faces looks poor (blocky/pixellated) compared to
the other faces Emacs uses.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: 22207-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: emacs-25 mishandles info code text on Fedora 23
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 13:48:50 -0700

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

I just now attempted to reproduce this bug on emacs-25, and could not 
reproduce it; the display looks OK (see attached). Although I am still 
running Fedora 23 x86-64, I have installed several packages since the 
original bug report in December so it's possible that the problem has 
gone away because some new fonts have been installed. Another 
possibility is that the bug has been fixed in draft Emacs 25 somehow. 
Either way, I will close this particular bug report now as I can't 
reproduce it.

[Screenshot-from-2016-05-05-13-45-22.png (image/png, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.