From unknown Sun Aug 10 16:48:51 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#22195 <22195@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#22195 <22195@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: deviation from POSIX in tee Reply-To: bug#22195 <22195@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 23:48:51 +0000 retitle 22195 deviation from POSIX in tee reassign 22195 coreutils submitter 22195 Eric Renouf severity 22195 normal tag 22195 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 17 15:34:14 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2015 20:34:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9fFd-0000UE-OJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:34:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49172) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9f0G-00005e-SN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:18:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9f0A-0004J1-Ee for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:18:15 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9f0A-0004Ix-CJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:18:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9f09-00072N-Bz for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:18:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9f05-0004IX-P0 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:18:13 -0500 Received: from resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.35]:40430) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9f05-0004IM-Jh for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:18:09 -0500 Received: from resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.104]) by resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ukJ81r0022Fh1PH01kJ8uL; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:18:08 +0000 Received: from derry.chelmsford.skaion.com ([98.216.203.168]) by resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ukJ71r00F3eWneA01kJ7M4; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:18:08 +0000 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:17:29 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) From: Eric Renouf To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: deviation from POSIX in tee Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23) X-X-Sender: erenouf@skaion.com@otaku.pair.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1450383488; bh=qEYY/29lo7yiwnK3pSnSS7N8TT6AfM16LU7H9IlaZO4=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=nVOG0ovU0XBLHoZAayZlLO1fqEeJn8GGB//QbS9nyzR8aVyDEYLShAAabztGbNSrI iy67W9lMsKU9XYGOsSm8jril6sfvDy6HcPrsCi4LdXI/NUqT3LqOpM6Zce9h6fxt8n TQxtWCahMNu/M4T4nTi7Ab4YVpg6jbl/z5hGxHyj6k2KFCqJ/9g0Jfq1zWh9vFgZpY gg2APojB3ANHYAd5OS9tIQTAFHeu0ndDtK3FeqJiXjSkJYAvHhia2tBgVJVmpkWHvr wLW67gbVhPdvmkx0pnEgAKyrM6FzG6HHN9Qcn3y55PMEeX+i9camspeMOaZPOaKCpV TgGdvBR9CrTOA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:34:12 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) When using tee with process substitution, if the process exits early it will cause tee to get a SIGPIPE after trying to write to the closed named pipe (per man 2 write). This causes tee to exit without finishing writing to any additional files or processes, which seems to be a violation of the POSIX standard at http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/tee.html specifically the Consequences of Errors section which states "If a write to any successfully opened file operand fails, writes to other successfully opened file operands and standard output shall continue, but the exit status shall be non-zero. Otherwise, the default actions specified in Utility Description Defaults apply." To recreate the problem I ran the following under bash: for i in {1..300}; do echo "$i" echo "$i" >&2 sleep 1 done | tee >(head -1 > h.txt; echo "Head done") \ >(tail -1 > t.txt) >/dev/null And I see output like the following: 1 Head done 2 and then it exits with echo "${PIPESTATUS[@]}" showing 141 141 and t.txt from the second process substitution only having "1" in it This was found from a Stack Overflow question at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34340706/incorrect-results-with-bash-process-substitution-and-tail I have verified this behavior with tee (GNU coreutils) 8.5 and tee (GNU coreutils) 8.13 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 17 22:22:10 2015 Received: (at 22195) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2015 03:22:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9lcP-0001Py-Ub for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:22:10 -0500 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:36424) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9lcO-0001Pm-Ia for 22195@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:22:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24761601E7; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:22:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id m9j2s5WEyIXy; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:22:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D54F160DFF; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:22:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id cXfDxNpigkwV; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:22:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-100-32-155-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [100.32.155.148]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F18AD1601E7; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:22:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#22195: deviation from POSIX in tee To: Eric Renouf , 22195@debbugs.gnu.org References: From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <56737BD9.6030705@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:22:01 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22195 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Eric Renouf wrote: > If a write to any successfully opened file operand fails But the write didn't fail here. Instead, a signal was sent to 'tee'. If you don't want the signal, trap it. E.g.: trap '' PIPE for i in {1..300}; do echo "$i" echo "$i" >&2 sleep 1 done | tee >(head -1 > h.txt; echo "Head done") \ >(tail -1 > t.txt) >/dev/null will give the behavior you want. So there is no deviation from POSIX here. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 02:19:58 2015 Received: (at 22195) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2015 07:19:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9pKY-0000G5-3k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:19:58 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:55943) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9pKW-0000Fr-23 for 22195@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:19:56 -0500 Received: from [192.168.101.10] ([84.175.82.53]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MC7ge-1a0zdZ2pYe-008twp; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:19:37 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#22195: deviation from POSIX in tee To: Paul Eggert , Eric Renouf , 22195@debbugs.gnu.org References: <56737BD9.6030705@cs.ucla.edu> From: Bernhard Voelker Message-ID: <5673B387.7020900@bernhard-voelker.de> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:19:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56737BD9.6030705@cs.ucla.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:iIanDvWbuDsW2fVx8jgs7FKxUwPY4UrC/osNXA57yP1RF6VKIX9 r8617G4G3kkHRv756KWMcGYmjep0gNQ460HUYi0O2V8vxj6nGGrF/iWV+uZ0V1mU9pMfXtF uCctR8CdTUtjB5qanL7ZgUoOmYgmroyS4SwZ/n0uI5UTCuH/QAeBOyekE/wBS2ONuU7JGHy DnMc0FcrP1W4xuGZuaIkg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:EcFYlgDH85I=:8B+zsto0UMPp6IUFcdTmQa hcD+vW3f27Xw22WJUkdzlUI8V8ci4zovKH6hNXAh9N9KQ16EVarhISRWkLq3+ElBXYP2Zwixy jEvimN1OTmzmKq6QWm1Ffj9nYb0jmu39uejtA1PVBBpISUkYUgE7iZmlrcppK1DxdSMjLZYVt g6/ctBckM6OS3SQ87bVtsM4HtmNA5PdexBDc+kyFTSm2h+nDN48YJBJ6i4KUiL9EdWO8mo+eL OvRLxpyIG9jZ2/BnStKwkXZgZfenb4u4lp+tn+L84jJhP0KLtseWNY90G1QAA0g4ly3tQ6Ed+ X///Q7Fy8xKHa9Z/iwsUofhsMxTygml39DRpB6Ekws+V/uTHi8fJmz32hbJcagSF6Ae0bU6uU YQt3gQ6SNKzMkm1/wES/mAzAZtgTniVXDXRrLRtVxKut554c7ARXwzJy4C5MLF0Jy0Lo+Zn3W GpDfdgV+MhBZb+bHxnqw1TWa7hefPjjf6kgv4r7Vc7AHe7X46uw63W0hlXT9Cs/nZpduLPGpn 2GU75YLOV429Dh6PmZvPiGgrCR+L17s7fyriUPDZQa7mu0GGwnas8IEhfTzJ3Ya6jNEdLZf08 6kDIvGJvFVrBZCrgTiyk33cYX7kUpkj/MGZsKkQEIUrPBm/g+bALKWA/I32zgulXbZgkbk0Ar UMYKfsO4eDsUlgtyM6Vrf1xz364KQ78KuqluY5iPdvCUHnNQo3+FkQNlhnVVbU5e4gi9m7V9y PiKIFITGBqTD0LEk X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22195 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 12/18/2015 04:22 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > Eric Renouf wrote: >> If a write to any successfully opened file operand fails > > But the write didn't fail here. Instead, a signal was sent to 'tee'. If you > don't want the signal, trap it. E.g.: > > trap '' PIPE > for i in {1..300}; do > echo "$i" > echo "$i" >&2 > sleep 1 > done | tee >(head -1 > h.txt; echo "Head done") \ > >(tail -1 > t.txt) >/dev/null > > will give the behavior you want. > > So there is no deviation from POSIX here. Furthermore, tee got the new --output-error=MODE option in version 8.24 to have more control over this: $ src/tee --help ... -p diagnose errors writing to non pipes --output-error[=MODE] set behavior on write error. See MODE below ... MODE determines behavior with write errors on the outputs: 'warn' diagnose errors writing to any output 'warn-nopipe' diagnose errors writing to any output not a pipe 'exit' exit on error writing to any output 'exit-nopipe' exit on error writing to any output not a pipe The default MODE for the -p option is 'warn-nopipe'. The default operation when --output-error is not specified, is to exit immediately on error writing to a pipe, and diagnose errors writing to non pipe outputs. A minor note to your command: instead of redirecting tee's output to /dev/null, you could use another pipe to save the write operations in tee to it: producer \ | tee --output-error=warn \ >(head -1 > h.txt; echo "Head done") \ | tail -1 > t.txt Have a nice day, Berny From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 06:13:19 2015 Received: (at 22195) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2015 11:13:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9syN-0005mO-6l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 06:13:19 -0500 Received: from mail2.vodafone.ie ([213.233.128.44]:52737) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9syL-0005mA-Eb for 22195@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 06:13:17 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsMAJLpc1ZtTYR4/2dsb2JhbABeDoJbUR40bQGCYrhlhAkhhWkBAgKBO0wBAQEBAQGBC4Q1AQEEEhEPAVYLDQsCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRQYBDAgBAQUSB4gRCqEXiiuFbYwOASyBAYRZhXqHd4FJBZZ/lwiTZmSCER2BGD4+NAGFEAEBAQ Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([109.77.132.120]) by mail2.vodafone.ie with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2015 11:13:11 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#22195: deviation from POSIX in tee To: Paul Eggert , Eric Renouf , 22195@debbugs.gnu.org References: <56737BD9.6030705@cs.ucla.edu> From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=c3=a1draig_Brady?= X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5673EA46.9080305@draigBrady.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:13:10 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56737BD9.6030705@cs.ucla.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22195 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) tag 22195 notabug close 22195 stop On 18/12/15 03:22, Paul Eggert wrote: > Eric Renouf wrote: >> If a write to any successfully opened file operand fails > > But the write didn't fail here. Instead, a signal was sent to 'tee'. If you > don't want the signal, trap it. E.g.: > > trap '' PIPE > for i in {1..300}; do > echo "$i" > echo "$i" >&2 > sleep 1 > done | tee >(head -1 > h.txt; echo "Head done") \ > >(tail -1 > t.txt) >/dev/null > > will give the behavior you want. > > So there is no deviation from POSIX here. Generally you don't want to ignore SIGPIPE. http://pixelbeat/programming/sigpipe_handling.html as then you have to deal with EPIPE from write(): $ trap '' PIPE $ seq 100000 | tee >(head -n1) > >(sed -n '/10000/{p;q}') 1 10000 seq: write error As Bernhard said, the new -p option is a solution to this: $ seq 100000 | tee >(head -n1) > >(tail -n1) 1 14139 $ seq 100000 | tee -p >(head -n1) > >(tail -n1) 1 100000 Note that's an option, rather than the default behavior as POSIX states to handle SIGPIPE in the default manner, and more importantly to support existing cases like the following (yes we don't support both modes of operation): $ yes | tee log | timeout process Since this is somewhat of a subjective default, and this issue pops up so frequently, I've just added it to: http://www.pixelbeat.org/docs/coreutils-gotchas.html#tee cheers, Pádraig From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 13:38:57 2015 Received: (at 22195) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2015 18:38:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9zvd-0005C4-1L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:38:57 -0500 Received: from havoc.proulx.com ([96.88.95.61]:55618) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9zvb-0005Bv-HK for 22195@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:38:55 -0500 Received: from joseki.proulx.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by havoc.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4136528; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:38:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DBA2183B; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:38:53 -0700 (MST) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 489922DC48; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:38:53 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:38:53 -0700 From: Bob Proulx To: Eric Renouf , 22195@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#22195: deviation from POSIX in tee Message-ID: <20151218113144806480269@bob.proulx.com> References: <56737BD9.6030705@cs.ucla.edu> <5673EA46.9080305@draigBrady.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5673EA46.9080305@draigBrady.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22195 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Pádraig Brady wrote: > Paul Eggert wrote: > > trap '' PIPE > > Generally you don't want to ignore SIGPIPE. > http://pixelbeat/programming/sigpipe_handling.html > as then you have to deal with EPIPE from write(): I wanted to add emphasis to this. Ignoring SIGPIPE causes a cascade of associated problems. Best not to do it. Bob P.S. Typo alert: http://pixelbeat/programming/sigpipe_handling.html Should be: http://www.pixelbeat.org/programming/sigpipe_handling.html From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 24 17:36:58 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2018 21:36:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40821 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFQpm-0000eW-5G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:36:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com ([209.85.210.178]:37574) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFQpk-0000eJ-2S for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:36:56 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id j23-v6so3084976pfi.4 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:36:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QI+14Ef2D58ZIW0508vEnmjfrOkFUaLgZ3qhlzjsfxo=; b=guE2+FPUzi3d5OOkXhf5k+5Vbg+7N2UAIugRx9nb+wjh5pSvdyiGfyvKlp3D7hT6ui RUp6NA/1HV+FZMJ/DDbP/CsSYOfLU/N+beTgWNJcrw0EOZ/HbvPRHoDtUfMn+l/4r4d6 hQqZqJs91AXUrDy8wE1dW1gwOLW/dFrSVv31WI4KJVkwu/9OGYTURNiJCUPjpFwR/TwI /ZJniFq8JdwLEXdlO2Uut2BGG4YFB8i+tZMqQ76h+bnyjbFeKir/6ecHHVwXRBd54P68 i7KIalCrS2oiqNO+DfL7v3U2y5P6eBfQlcXdhkJihNvB1xLAttKSQ1fTxc8XyWhfabZL 1kxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QI+14Ef2D58ZIW0508vEnmjfrOkFUaLgZ3qhlzjsfxo=; b=bdPaHwRYDxqHrkZY/1oGMXPHQOB2ommD1AsfTVeDjCn8afBneyxv1pHVCaQOCImGEh 863+wdruXbgW2XYwXhQR+a+J7T6r18A4SnlCuzl0JylGhyFRDf1kSAElXL0fSupk0XTK uRGc+Bdw4xl3ws0sQuwFfqt2kLtsXmH2CK9MX2OIPu9EXkWLWJfolTiv7DMNDuJrc/SQ S0wkCiyIf9VXLAXIRKhtRdJvoFDf659CLBGrIQ7DQHmjAumPCOzEwe8jdbe9F2WvJWIQ WLR7KzN6P9LMEYczaxXOhaLSHtu+jL3ofh2wVJBtz70rIFONBWlpps3roovkM5gPKksZ /jmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJqbFWJteMD2AiDD+WMbq4gd0snhu059PZ3hTtfPy9uhT9l9yqp cwvlOnU/TslKZ/eVSsKFp8BLhIFOCT8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5e07fsNneJDGjeFjYjhQ9NVPTk0eYQJckqvUbtO7SivK4JB2Qjz2OcV5NdE0QLqBpXBzhB4oA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:6801:: with SMTP id d1-v6mr4204539pfc.7.1540417009823; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w33-v6sm12142065pgl.29.2018.10.24.14.36.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:36:48 -0700 (PDT) To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Assaf Gordon Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:36:47 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 22195 notabug close 22195 [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (assafgordon[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.210.178 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.210.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) tags 22195 notabug close 22195 From unknown Sun Aug 10 16:48:51 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator