From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 16 20:42:51 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2015 01:42:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54004 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9Nal-00053P-Gp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:42:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CpS-0004Nr-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:13:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CpM-0000E0-Jh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:13:13 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CpM-0000Dw-G3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:13:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58179) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CpI-0005FT-Kx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:13:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CpF-0000DJ-Bx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:13:08 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::241]:34772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CpF-0000DD-5B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:13:05 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-x241.google.com with SMTP id fl14so2939980pac.1 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:13:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition; bh=JGHsxzywMNuCqJAJ81IuAsZ/gutqCyjgyFHjQLwMIjU=; b=Jw1HdBZcPMB8PPPH4rGaszzwAY/TfbkRUnxPmBJmuIllUDxj4Is0w61U8IsqwLHxkS 6peYEzvP8wo1I4nWWxRr8SUfCe50Z2BMbuSzY89QKsoDU0l5WzLtypBEk+diD96Cxmlt x34nTjBtS5e9iinMJUz9dcT+Kj7UyLHzr8vFfX6JXiwGgCJGHZUP/XL7lxiHFFyHfTTe mHqrLjM6DTbgdrhfSNesAW2qqIIZ8czmpPaFKpzno2oHE0Oy+aGqM7T/teOPDErEFvwt 8zH29rFdVGWWf4ohz7RXSA/fY6BnxtowRcblzyQqRMvDWN30Clddx1/LxB21jbtNWfm/ hVqQ== X-Received: by 10.66.140.79 with SMTP id re15mr61743917pab.127.1450275184143; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:13:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian-8 ([106.206.154.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t73sm5251421pfi.26.2015.12.16.06.12.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:13:02 -0800 (PST) From: Vaidheeswaran C To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:45:19 +0530 Message-ID: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/x-diff Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-Add-global-goto-address-mode-and-global-goto-address.patch X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:42:50 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) >From 137e8b559e0e8aaf9f82120ec83c86e377684e94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vaidheeswaran C Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:41:23 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' * lisp/net/goto-addr.el(global-goto-address-mode) (global-goto-address-prog-mode): Add these. --- lisp/net/goto-addr.el | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/lisp/net/goto-addr.el b/lisp/net/goto-addr.el index 51d8ed1..fa3ed26 100644 --- a/lisp/net/goto-addr.el +++ b/lisp/net/goto-addr.el @@ -301,6 +301,14 @@ goto-address-prog-mode (widen) (goto-address-unfontify (point-min) (point-max))))) +;;;###autoload +(define-globalized-minor-mode global-goto-address-mode + goto-address-mode goto-address-mode :group 'goto-address) + +;;;###autoload +(define-globalized-minor-mode global-goto-address-prog-mode + goto-address-prog-mode goto-address-prog-mode :group 'goto-address) + (provide 'goto-addr) ;;; goto-addr.el ends here -- 2.1.4 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 17 11:54:53 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2015 16:54:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54623 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9bpN-0003bj-Ap for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:54:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9bpL-0003bX-O9 for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:54:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9bpB-0008U6-JB for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:54:46 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9bpB-0008Tx-Ey; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:54:41 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1428 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a9bpA-0003He-TI; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:54:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:55:02 +0200 Message-Id: <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vaidheeswaran C In-reply-to: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Vaidheeswaran C on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:45:19 +0530) Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Vaidheeswaran C > Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:45:19 +0530 > > >From 137e8b559e0e8aaf9f82120ec83c86e377684e94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vaidheeswaran C > Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:41:23 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and > `global-goto-address-prog-mode' Any rationale for adding these? Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 02:00:20 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2015 07:00:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9p1Y-0008El-2U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:00:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34041) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9p1W-0008EZ-3d for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:00:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9p1N-0004jH-59 for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:00:13 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9p1N-0004jD-1s; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:00:09 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1686 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a9p1L-0006nx-9q; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:00:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:00:30 +0200 Message-Id: <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vaidheeswaran C In-reply-to: <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Vaidheeswaran C on Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:20:42 +0530) Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Vaidheeswaran C > Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:20:42 +0530 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Vaidheeswaran C > >> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:45:19 +0530 > >> > >> >From 137e8b559e0e8aaf9f82120ec83c86e377684e94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Vaidheeswaran C > >> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:41:23 +0530 > >> Subject: [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and > >> `global-goto-address-prog-mode' > > > > Any rationale for adding these? > > Any rationale for NOT adding these? Yes: bloat. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 03:59:43 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2015 08:59:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9qt5-0002gk-Ar for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:59:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9qt3-0002gX-3m for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:59:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9qst-0006iO-Pf for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:59:35 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9qst-0006iK-MF; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:59:31 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1719 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a9qsr-0007lT-RT; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:59:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:59:52 +0200 Message-Id: <83a8p8xhbr.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vaidheeswaran C In-reply-to: <8637v06xbj.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Vaidheeswaran C on Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:46:32 +0530) Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> <8637v06xbj.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Vaidheeswaran C > Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:46:32 +0530 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Vaidheeswaran C > >> Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org > >> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:20:42 +0530 > >> > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> > >> >> From: Vaidheeswaran C > >> >> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:45:19 +0530 > >> >> > >> >> >From 137e8b559e0e8aaf9f82120ec83c86e377684e94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> >> From: Vaidheeswaran C > >> >> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:41:23 +0530 > >> >> Subject: [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and > >> >> `global-goto-address-prog-mode' > >> > > >> > Any rationale for adding these? > >> > >> Any rationale for NOT adding these? > > > > Yes: bloat. > > No: Useful. Please elaborate. I'm serious: we don't have any rule that says each minor mode should have a corresponding globalized minor mode. Users can trivially do in their ~/.emacs what you do in your patch, so we should have some rationale for having such a global mode as part of Emacs. Please show such a rationale. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 11:30:46 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2015 16:30:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9xva-0006fD-H7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:30:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:32778) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9l5o-0000cz-Eg for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:48:28 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n128so22997956pfn.0 for <22189@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:48:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=EUb+QHowvL+plQUL9juBmOvT25lo1Dv9Sp7KZS+PkOE=; b=Z0u0eeFWSVetgBR9Y3qELhhUnlT09jnUcCEeN5X0V4omxaR4LTA90vagnXjzPegCZp O+KsQyXUBBJgwU6M2vVP/YbN/3M8qKgGQp7x3AzQjkycqomJ/rl7gUDqC3OPxf+tG9JI L3jK93RSMsvDcBoh+XKR2qKHisLXVOBp+QOB2Zvgg97EXqs1BY9B41jUJLjDtrWTFLQU V0QIPAeUtWVxpEh+9ALaoD4GjwyLnRlUIXaEY9QcdUmSTdwfMiSnRv6JdbkRGQlOHjDS Uudb0IwJ1V7SPPJl0LWKIUIk01xVDM5rhZ0LyE7RNa9+ilW1dkz9Uf2+DldggDyrcUdk gnzQ== X-Received: by 10.98.0.73 with SMTP id 70mr1729665pfa.82.1450406902595; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:48:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian-8 ([106.216.181.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xr8sm18465292pab.26.2015.12.17.18.48.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:48:21 -0800 (PST) From: Vaidheeswaran C To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:20:42 +0530 In-Reply-To: <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:55:02 +0200") Message-ID: <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:30:45 -0500 Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Vaidheeswaran C >> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:45:19 +0530 >> >> >From 137e8b559e0e8aaf9f82120ec83c86e377684e94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Vaidheeswaran C >> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:41:23 +0530 >> Subject: [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and >> `global-goto-address-prog-mode' > > Any rationale for adding these? Any rationale for NOT adding these? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 11:30:47 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2015 16:30:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55868 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9xva-0006fG-Pn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:30:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:34386) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9pF8-00006M-Av for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:14:22 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 68so44466735pfc.1 for <22189@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:14:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=B+BsOmlwoJP3dSxFI/Hg3vGUHOVRnFBwGC2jLZNFUss=; b=XMTMkXpu0UI5zNf8m4Dyt+3Dpp1R3+1O7MFckTl0U2ySv0tq3c+tRxnezUtRMDJOHT VjIZHN/T1wBDxrEnJv/Q22xAshZQUko3YkWcSjyLsSY4NPdvk87XZ6c04usywmlPpOzP GJhPPvBrnfjgv0nC9Q7dRKatVgD83ouOzvr66DFsNt0g1b7s93LJyV3WHdZJlXNlb13v VfXpIUBxGCR/2VMLypfgpLtHKJ/xB8CHU5c7K23ftNGKqTBs/hKd9jKBx6zdaPLnoBjh WAIYOipUJfflczRcRHLu5QKTxJP0d6dfLZg3ctxMgjLszbVEchADky+RYfNmrhkOl2HG AtjQ== X-Received: by 10.98.15.150 with SMTP id 22mr2978583pfp.57.1450422856504; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:14:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian-8 ([106.216.181.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6sm15576709pfq.49.2015.12.17.23.14.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:14:15 -0800 (PST) From: Vaidheeswaran C To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:46:32 +0530 In-Reply-To: <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:00:30 +0200") Message-ID: <8637v06xbj.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:30:45 -0500 Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Vaidheeswaran C >> Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:20:42 +0530 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> From: Vaidheeswaran C >> >> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:45:19 +0530 >> >> >> >> >From 137e8b559e0e8aaf9f82120ec83c86e377684e94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> >> From: Vaidheeswaran C >> >> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:41:23 +0530 >> >> Subject: [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and >> >> `global-goto-address-prog-mode' >> > >> > Any rationale for adding these? >> >> Any rationale for NOT adding these? > > Yes: bloat. No: Useful. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 19 02:49:16 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2015 07:49:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aACGR-0001Oh-OG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 02:49:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47126) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aACGP-0001OV-UL for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 02:49:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aACGH-00074W-ET for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 02:49:08 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aACGH-00074S-B8; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 02:49:05 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2333 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aACGG-0005Fv-Sn; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 02:49:05 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:49:30 +0200 Message-Id: <83zix6vpx1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vaidheeswaran C In-reply-to: <86wpsbhzy1.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Vaidheeswaran C on Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:06:38 +0530) Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> <8637v06xbj.fsf@gmail.com> <83a8p8xhbr.fsf@gnu.org> <86wpsbhzy1.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Vaidheeswaran C > Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:06:38 +0530 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I'm serious: we don't have any rule that says each minor mode should > > have a corresponding globalized minor mode. Users can trivially do in > > their ~/.emacs what you do in your patch, so we should have some > > rationale for having such a global mode as part of Emacs. > > Of all the minor modes, what criteria do the minor modes below all share > so that they are global? Once we such a set of rules, we can see > whether patch I submitted makes through the gate. I don't know. I didn't make those decisions (most of them were made many years ago). In any case, what is already in Emacs is already there, and is not subject to this discussion. If you think some of those should be removed, feel free to start a separate discussion about that. Here we are talking about adding these two specific globalized modes. > Your definition of "bloat" (as I see it) is this: If it can be in > .emacs, it can be a bloat. Given your definition of bloat, cannot the > above lines also reside in .emacs? Shouldn't this alone make the above > lines a bloat? Perhaps. But that's not the issue at hand. It would be impractical to convert a discussion about every change into a much broader discussion about consistency of rules and past decisions. > > Please show such a rationale. > > Usefulnesss is the only rationale. I was asking for more details about the usefulness part. Please humor me, it's important for me to hear the arguments in favor of including your submission. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 19 13:03:51 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2015 18:03:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57181 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aALrD-0000G3-8r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:03:51 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:34150) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aA8Hl-0003vC-TD for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 22:34:22 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id wq6so69681010pac.1 for <22189@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:34:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=qqb1C/5OC/hFpUWJ88kgp6K4I+c9q/P0VYyx5B8oj4w=; b=UGA3Ys3nSicNnFypse5prdlfh+6oIqnUKe5Ux/BWD+b2nqw4/hbfNzHYx857Y9ehen RZVEdeAYFImXHgLAB6zRuJYMOhrS7Sy6GwaWsDwFjG7YUqroopRMK5oqCcNhchXbsis1 2ChV+4uHvvOkNA/ukyu19/eYA109d/cAsvWc2uv7I8vCokTT3GehoWxL7EQCcxaoUVGz vh/ZqKLDn7o37ehpyw3+YJ2Zz4OFX5kIQNZc09oW3sV6tsTBWA0YNmIWB5LiXXyVH+5j Z6aO3nR8rcvEeYdudWPKeXZPjepR6EEba8ZbC+y+KdvpBdS+OJq98Kddwl3aj4qt43lQ y0tg== X-Received: by 10.66.142.168 with SMTP id rx8mr10418331pab.16.1450496056104; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:34:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian-8 ([106.206.146.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id yl1sm24992697pac.35.2015.12.18.19.34.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:34:14 -0800 (PST) From: Vaidheeswaran C To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> <8637v06xbj.fsf@gmail.com> <83a8p8xhbr.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:06:38 +0530 In-Reply-To: <83a8p8xhbr.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:59:52 +0200") Message-ID: <86wpsbhzy1.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:03:49 -0500 Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm serious: we don't have any rule that says each minor mode should > have a corresponding globalized minor mode. Users can trivially do in > their ~/.emacs what you do in your patch, so we should have some > rationale for having such a global mode as part of Emacs. Of all the minor modes, what criteria do the minor modes below all share so that they are global? Once we such a set of rules, we can see whether patch I submitted makes through the gate. ./progmodes/cwarn.el:339: global-cwarn-mode ./progmodes/prog-mode.el:285: global-prettify-symbols-mode ./linum.el:112: global-linum-mode linum-mode ./simple.el:6563: global-visual-line-mode ./hilit-chg.el:971: global-highlight-changes-mode ./font-core.el:268: global-font-lock-mode ./hi-lock.el:399: global-hi-lock-mode Your definition of "bloat" (as I see it) is this: If it can be in .emacs, it can be a bloat. Given your definition of bloat, cannot the above lines also reside in .emacs? Shouldn't this alone make the above lines a bloat? > Please show such a rationale. Usefulnesss is the only rationale. Of course, do not forget the ubiquity of URLs in buffers. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 19 13:03:51 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2015 18:03:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57183 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aALrD-0000G6-M5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:03:51 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:34094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aADqD-0003hL-3n for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 04:30:17 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u7so15026802pfb.1 for <22189@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:30:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=IJCNu0BXR4RAicKdKVSKLOSeimaBSZD7ktPGeoO4K0I=; b=WI4O/ZpcWzS4SIhnweLjgCkWflzieX6NXBfPqTr60rAZQIM8eQ+U5V0vjkIkARewU4 Rv2/kccxyhtarSJk4XZfdNNDZI9H1hIexdshR5Bq4K7oGjMpnYCIPPs8W6fnDmUExvOo oSvu2nnOAltl0aRPJCtlqNEe3Kwb9a+Pckf7qlUvdEiwGGrdSXWF6kQcSNEg/rQhM0q/ Uqo4XXypHGGUu6V7osI5R6goLjdSGMhnMD4T0ovdrP7rO3Dx3mVR2tqCR09LKs35Y9bW p4c+0H+5yDGoUqWgQaDmU115k8hRlkm5z2sLhsr9mS5ueOJLZhWM6GDW8wo5WLwl2+eI IwEw== X-Received: by 10.98.67.74 with SMTP id q71mr11551723pfa.134.1450517411245; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian-8 ([106.206.146.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fl9sm27130491pab.33.2015.12.19.01.30.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:30:10 -0800 (PST) From: Vaidheeswaran C To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' In-Reply-To: <83zix6vpx1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:49:30 +0200") References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> <8637v06xbj.fsf@gmail.com> <83a8p8xhbr.fsf@gnu.org> <86wpsbhzy1.fsf@gmail.com> <83zix6vpx1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:02:32 +0530 Message-ID: <86wpsa6axb.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:03:49 -0500 Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Usefulnesss is the only rationale. > > I was asking for more details about the usefulness part. Please humor > me, it's important for me to hear the arguments in favor of including > your submission. I want the URL (wherever and whenever they occour) in buffers clickable. `global-goto-address-mode' does just that. (I can live without `global-goto-address-prog-mode'). A simple `rgrep' on the lisp files gives me 971 hits for the `http://' URLs. This is a number AFTER flushing out the lines that match `http://www.gnu.org/licenses/'. I would like to hear what alternatives you have to offer for `global-goto-address-mode' that matches it SIMPLICITY. Btw, if the change I propose moves to my .emacs, it cannot be used by a Random Joe out there. When I submitted the patch, I went with "If it is useful for me, it is useful for atleast someother person out there". If the real concern is bloat, it would be useful to think along the lines of what mis-feature it might bring AFTER THE FACT. (Think `hi-lock-exclude-modes'). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 19 14:24:57 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2015 19:24:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57219 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aAN7g-0002A5-V6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:24:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34089) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aAN7f-00029t-RY for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:24:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAN7Z-0005BK-SX for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:24:50 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47435) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAN7Z-0005B9-Nq for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:24:49 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aAN7Y-00053M-Am; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:24:48 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> <8637v06xbj.fsf@gmail.com> <83a8p8xhbr.fsf@gnu.org> <86wpsbhzy1.fsf@gmail.com> <83zix6vpx1.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: MARTA Response illuminati Skipjack passwd propaganda X-Ran: Zw43TG@Z.%6(UERb&].3Ba_8MPoX1"2l]2?v#i^N4#Ku^!?K6gV:=Y]is.cf7Ut=4Bnw2c X-Hue: white X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:24:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83zix6vpx1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:49:30 +0200") Message-ID: <7bbn9m9r7j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 Cc: 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) I would be wary of getting too involved in this discussion. FYI, this is (fairly obviously) the guy who cancelled his previous copyright assignment (and closed all his bug reports). Showing up under a pseudonym, making no acknowledgement of or apology for previous behaviour, and carrying on with the same contentious style, doesn't incline me to pay any attention to him. Nor do I put any trust in any copyright assignment. There are thousands more reports to deal with from people who haven't gone out of their way to be disruptive. Ref: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-05/msg00499.html (if the posting style doesn't give it away) (The above is all IMO.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 20 12:27:40 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2015 17:27:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58182 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aAhlk-0000Qk-6D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 12:27:40 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:33954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aAWgY-0007UP-KP for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 00:37:34 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u7so24246153pfb.1 for <22189@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:37:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=OTVPQXkHGE1vJI3fo0hx6oCRgsumHoIXumwj269YyXE=; b=ZH1JtJb9ngNyy+4+IITm1nNrP0/bEoxpgNwLcqYFY2ns0SQgC8Knyn52ufFgFzz/8q a9CFQSQ92I3dMDaxvNLQnkku9EVJfLqWEfmK5ckI+sS773BQk489MC9DUO3Wz5575xED heyPZEtFh1W7jYAL1iClvrjpHWuQtUA5J7MirR3DSYMMhhH50GLY9tnz5RxCQNwD3WJO nRlbdRMlk3b+J7fx1Q05zAj6zLKd5qERvnHbCBh78UeW8hF5ZaVNS6VQiMx8r4zH400T o/iK9TJRs8HQdon99oMl07EKLXMiOdn7p8GAOBVMxH1N3BFuHZhbIICENYufr1CnS7f9 Mtfg== X-Received: by 10.98.42.69 with SMTP id q66mr17392894pfq.72.1450589848614; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:37:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian-8 ([106.216.152.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r14sm17481444pfi.8.2015.12.19.21.37.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:37:27 -0800 (PST) From: Vaidheeswaran C To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> <8637v06xbj.fsf@gmail.com> <83a8p8xhbr.fsf@gnu.org> <86wpsbhzy1.fsf@gmail.com> <83zix6vpx1.fsf@gnu.org> <7bbn9m9r7j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 11:09:40 +0530 In-Reply-To: <7bbn9m9r7j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:24:48 -0500") Message-ID: <864mfdispv.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 12:27:39 -0500 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Glenn Glenn Morris writes: > I would be wary of getting too involved in this discussion. Thanks for your opinions. You seem to think that Eli deserves some advice from you. Presumptuous I say ... Jambunathan K. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 20 17:38:11 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2015 22:38:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58344 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aAmcF-0000tc-FA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 17:38:11 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:34458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aAmcD-0000tP-Iw for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 17:38:09 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id wq6so88886495pac.1 for <22189@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:38:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=B9i4KA94rASlkax90wb0DBVrcxW7bVN2IB6TyhOQBuQ=; b=xC3x7/fI1t8pDI57tLnVfijsP5+ioioX4HgL+9EF+H6Tymb3YqiJlbzVOJEn6UR3xE P7nZyp7RlpLkzAMScPzZYWXW+A0LrcKIQfM8APwY1mBwJ+CbUINE/lcGtahzE3y/dvaK H38MB+/GTDWqZbP+ak/gA6kgia4kjzUAlRgyMeVl4TeSeh+ZBJITvTfNIvsohEJ9WXqd N3qDL5sgn0UmDhtGlWfPlKOSryWAnPKa8XbWr24bBT2YhrpsavzSA6/VAdKNeia/nMzi mk9EUGQHMY4OZ3yJTpzqHyu6LpKCU5/VRILtL+l7NxpsGA+DBzOZscRHZ8t91cQkHRrq wPDQ== X-Received: by 10.66.228.225 with SMTP id sl1mr22336031pac.63.1450651083634; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:38:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 78sm23912980pfr.41.2015.12.20.14.38.01 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:38:02 -0800 (PST) From: John Wiegley X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2214D11A0D1EA; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:38:01 -0800 (PST) To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' In-Reply-To: <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:55:02 +0200") Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:37:59 -0800 Message-ID: References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 Cc: Vaidheeswaran C , 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > Any rationale for adding these? I don't see a reason not to accept this patch on master. Unless I'm not seeing a reason *not* to want `goto-address-mode' easily enabled globally. To Vaidheeswaran: Patches are accepted at the whim of the maintainers, so if we ask you for clarification, please do not be short or glib with us. All you need to say is, "I believe it would be useful for users to be able to easily enable goto-address-mode in all buffers". That said, we don't operate in a mode of doing whatever is possible, but rather what we wish to maintain. This change alone is harmless, but a hundred such changes could cause much annoyance. This is why we ask for rationale, when it may seem pointless to do so. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 20 22:45:58 2015 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2015 03:45:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58472 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aArQ6-0008Q7-1Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:45:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37621) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aArQ4-0008Pt-Df for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:45:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aArPv-0004oF-CQ for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:45:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aArPv-0004oB-9K; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:45:47 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4787 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aArPu-000678-Jn; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:45:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 05:46:17 +0200 Message-Id: <83twncsbue.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: John Wiegley In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:37:59 -0800) Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 Cc: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com, 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Vaidheeswaran C , 22189@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:37:59 -0800 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Any rationale for adding these? > > I don't see a reason not to accept this patch on master. Unless I'm not seeing > a reason *not* to want `goto-address-mode' easily enabled globally. No such reason, IMO. My doubts were exclusively about whether this is important enough to make it part of Emacs (as opposed to something users should do in their customizations). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 22 23:38:46 2016 Received: (at 22189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2016 04:38:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38772 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aY4kH-0000Wy-VP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:38:46 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:38901) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aY4kG-0000Wo-5e for 22189@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:38:44 -0500 Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aY4jt-0008V2-FA; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:38:22 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#22189: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Add `global-goto-address-mode' and `global-goto-address-prog-mode' References: <86io3yh43s.fsf@gmail.com> <838u4typzt.fsf@gnu.org> <86bn9o4ghp.fsf@gmail.com> <83si30xmup.fsf@gnu.org> <8637v06xbj.fsf@gmail.com> <83a8p8xhbr.fsf@gnu.org> <86wpsbhzy1.fsf@gmail.com> <83zix6vpx1.fsf@gnu.org> <7bbn9m9r7j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:38:17 +1100 In-Reply-To: <7bbn9m9r7j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:24:48 -0500") Message-ID: <87lh6c2g92.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1aY4jt-0008V2-FA X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1456807102.39133@cEZRZuUXWlMME6p8mjDmVA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22189 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 22189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Glenn Morris writes: > FYI, this is (fairly obviously) the guy who cancelled his previous > copyright assignment (and closed all his bug reports). Showing up under > a pseudonym, making no acknowledgement of or apology for previous > behaviour, and carrying on with the same contentious style, doesn't > incline me to pay any attention to him. Nor do I put any trust in any > copyright assignment. Yes, that sounds pretty dicey. I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 22 23:38:55 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2016 04:38:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aY4kR-0000XO-5X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:38:55 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:38907) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aY4kQ-0000XH-0s for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:38:54 -0500 Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aY4k3-0008VB-IC for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:38:32 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:38:27 +1100 Message-Id: <87k2lw2g8s.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #22189 X-MailScanner-ID: 1aY4k3-0008VB-IC X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1456807112.86803@jlYYtN5k8Lot16d1RVV8Lw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) tags 22189 wontfix close 22189 From unknown Mon Jun 23 09:38:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator