GNU bug report logs - #22179
Partition alignment using parted

Previous Next

Package: parted;

Reported by: Ankur Tank <Ankur.Tank <at> LntTechservices.com>

Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:34:01 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 22179 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-parted <at> gnu.org:
bug#22179; Package parted. (Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:34:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Ankur Tank <Ankur.Tank <at> LntTechservices.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-parted <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:34:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ankur Tank <Ankur.Tank <at> LntTechservices.com>
To: "bug-parted <at> gnu.org" <bug-parted <at> gnu.org>
Cc: "artfri2 <at> gmail.com" <artfri2 <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Partition alignment using parted
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:25:42 +0000
Hi Parted Experts,

I am working on am335x based board.
We are using eMMC and as a storage medium and parted for partitioning eMMC.

I am not able to use "optimal" alignment option with parted when partitioning eMMC.
I get following error messages when I use "optimal" alignment

Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performance.
Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performance.
Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performance.

1. Do we have to worry about this message ?

I have put question on Unix & Linux Stackexchange also below is the link for the same
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/248939/how-to-achieve-optimal-alignment-for-emmc-partition

Now parted reports logical and physical sector size as same.
"Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B"

2. Now my question is, is physical size reported by parted is physical sector size or emulated physical sector size?
3.  How can we achieve optimal alignment ? Any suggestions?

Thank you,

Regards,
Ankur



L&T Technology Services Ltd

www.LntTechservices.com<http://www.lnttechservices.com/>

This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the intended recipient (s). If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it from your system.




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 76 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.