GNU bug report logs - #22153
Make check fails

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 22153 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 22153 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dennis Mungai <dmngaie <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Make check fails
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 22:00:17 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

See attached test suite log.

Build used: latest master branch clone from git.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[test-suite.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 22153 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Dennis Mungai <dmngaie <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 22153 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22153: Make check fails
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 12:09:50 +0100

Hi,

Dennis Mungai <dmngaie <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> + GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET=/home/administrator/source.build/GCC.buildenv/guix-0.9.0/t-register-39139/var/guix/guix/daemon-socket/socket
> + export NIX_IGNORE_SYMLINK_STORE NIX_STORE_DIR NIX_STATE_DIR NIX_LOG_DIR NIX_DB_DIR GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET
> ++ echo /home/administrator/source.build/GCC.buildenv/guix-0.9.0/t-register-39139/var/guix/guix/daemon-socket/socket
> ++ wc -c
> + '[' 109 -ge 108 ']'
> + exit 77

The build directory name is very long, which means that we are a likely
to hit the kernel’s limitation on the length of socket file names, as in
the snippet above.

What does this command:

  grep ac_cv_guix_test_socket_file_name_length config.log

return?

At configure time, one normally gets a warning:

  socket file name limit may be exceeded when running tests

(This is not an error because there’s no problem if you don’t run ‘make
check’.)

In your case I think you would have to build from a shorter directory.

HTH,
Ludo’.

Message #11 received at 22153 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dennis Mungai <dmngaie <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 22153 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22153: Make check fails
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:49:06 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

And sorry for replying so late.

A few days ago, I repeated the build under /tmp and all unit tests passed.
Could've been related to the issue above.
I'd have to repeat the guix build above in the same directory once I'm
logged on to the HPC's node to get you the requested results.

Regards,

Dennis.

On 13 December 2015 at 14:09, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Dennis Mungai <dmngaie <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > +
> GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET=/home/administrator/source.build/GCC.buildenv/guix-0.9.0/t-register-39139/var/guix/guix/daemon-socket/socket
> > + export NIX_IGNORE_SYMLINK_STORE NIX_STORE_DIR NIX_STATE_DIR
> NIX_LOG_DIR NIX_DB_DIR GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET
> > ++ echo
> /home/administrator/source.build/GCC.buildenv/guix-0.9.0/t-register-39139/var/guix/guix/daemon-socket/socket
> > ++ wc -c
> > + '[' 109 -ge 108 ']'
> > + exit 77
>
> The build directory name is very long, which means that we are a likely
> to hit the kernel’s limitation on the length of socket file names, as in
> the snippet above.
>
> What does this command:
>
>   grep ac_cv_guix_test_socket_file_name_length config.log
>
> return?
>
> At configure time, one normally gets a warning:
>
>   socket file name limit may be exceeded when running tests
>
> (This is not an error because there’s no problem if you don’t run ‘make
> check’.)
>
> In your case I think you would have to build from a shorter directory.
>
> HTH,
> Ludo’.
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #14 received at 22153 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Dennis Mungai <dmngaie <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 22153 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22153: Make check fails
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:04:12 +0100

Dennis Mungai <dmngaie <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> A few days ago, I repeated the build under /tmp and all unit tests passed.
> Could've been related to the issue above.

Yes, probably.

> I'd have to repeat the guix build above in the same directory once I'm
> logged on to the HPC's node to get you the requested results.

Sure.

Thanks for your feedback!

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.