From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:39:10 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22139: Indirect dependencies are not grafted Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 22139 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22139@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.144974034617660 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:40:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2015 09:39:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a6xgo-0004al-6P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:39:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50691) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a6xgm-0004aJ-U7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:39:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6xgh-0003jJ-4h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:38:59 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6xgh-0003jF-2r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:38:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6xgg-0003bR-Bf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:38:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6xgd-0003iN-HM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:38:58 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47255) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6xgd-0003iI-Eq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:38:55 -0500 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:36498 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a6xgc-00032c-TX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:38:55 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 20 Frimaire an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:38:53 +0100 Message-ID: <877fkmk5hu.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) The grafting mechanism has a shortcoming: it is not recursive. Suppose we use =E2=80=98replace=E2=80=99 to provide a patch libpng. If a p= ackage has a direct dependency on libpng, it is appropriately grafted to refer to the new libpng. However, if a package depends on libfoo, which in turn depends on libpng, then that package will keep referring to the old libfoo, which refers to the old libpng. Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:39:10 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22139: Indirect dependencies are not grafted References: <877fkmk5hu.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <877fkmk5hu.fsf@gnu.org> Resent-From: Christopher Allan Webber Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22139 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22139@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 22139-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22139.14557285002992 (code B ref 22139); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 22139) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2016 17:01:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5Tv-0000mC-Sc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:01:40 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:46864) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5Tu-0000m4-JU for 22139@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:01:38 -0500 Received: from oolong (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3F36267AA for <22139@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:01:37 -0500 (EST) From: Christopher Allan Webber Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:59:17 -0800 Message-ID: <87twl7jmoe.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Mark Weaver laid out a plan that he thinks would work on IRC a couple of years ago, and referenced it yesterday on #guix. Here it is: https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2014-09-25#T480219 Some further conversation: https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2014-10-27#T502706 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 22 09:34:43 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2016 14:34:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36968 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXrZS-0001lC-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:34:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56647) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXrZR-0001l0-Mc for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:34:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXrZI-0006ug-In for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:34:36 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXrZI-0006uc-Fv for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:34:32 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:53974 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aXrZH-0005k2-RG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:34:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:34:30 +0100 Message-Id: <8760xgolu1.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #22139 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) severity 22139 serious From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:39:10 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22139: Indirect dependencies are not grafted Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22139 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22139@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Mark H Weaver , Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 22139-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22139.145678899714871 (code B ref 22139); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 22139) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Feb 2016 23:36:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54310 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aaXMf-0003rh-Gj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:36:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aaXMd-0003rU-1K for 22139@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:36:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaXMV-0002Hj-WA for 22139@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:36:25 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaXMA-0001vq-Kk; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:36:02 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:49868 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aaXM9-0003A8-RB; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:36:02 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <877fkmk5hu.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:35:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877fkmk5hu.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:38:53 +0100") Message-ID: <8737sb3x9c.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > The grafting mechanism has a shortcoming: it is not recursive. > > Suppose we use =E2=80=98replace=E2=80=99 to provide a patch libpng. If a= package has a > direct dependency on libpng, it is appropriately grafted to refer to the > new libpng. However, if a package depends on libfoo, which in turn > depends on libpng, then that package will keep referring to the old > libfoo, which refers to the old libpng. The =E2=80=98wip-recursive-grafts=E2=80=99 branch fixes that. It also chan= ges =E2=80=98graft-derivation=E2=80=99 to choose whether to graft something bas= ed on its *run-time* dependencies (as reported by =E2=80=98guix gc -R=E2=80=99) inste= ad of its compile-time dependencies. The advantage is that fewer things will be grafted; the disadvantage is that things like --dry-run will seem to have no effect since sometimes, the thing will start by building/downloading stuff. I think the advantage outweighs the disadvantage, but we=E2=80=99ll see how it goes in practice. There=E2=80=99s room for optimization in a few places, but overall it perfo= rms well and there=E2=80=99s no performance regression in the absence of grafts AFAICS. So I think I may merge it real soon, possibly so we can use it for the OpenSSL fix tomorrow and crash-test it. Thoughts? Here=E2=80=99s a patch I used to test grafting (it artificially adds a =E2=80=98replacement=E2=80=99 for OpenSSL that is slightly different and yi= elds a different derivation): --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --- a/gnu/packages/tls.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/tls.scm @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ ;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU -;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s +;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2014, 2015, 2016 Mark H Weaver ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2014 Ian Denhardt ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2013, 2015 Andreas Enge @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ protocols, as well as to parse and write X.5009, PKCS 1= 2, OpenPGP and other required structures.") (license license:lgpl2.1+))) =20 -(define-public openssl +(define openssl/fixed (package (name "openssl") (version "1.0.2f") @@ -191,9 +191,7 @@ required structures.") (sha256 (base32 "171fkdg9v6j29d962nh6kb79kfm8kkhy7n9makw39d7jvvj4wawk")) - (patches (map search-patch - '("openssl-runpath.patch" - "openssl-c-rehash.patch"))))) + (patches (map search-patch '("openssl-runpath.patch"))))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (native-inputs `(("perl" ,perl))) (arguments @@ -282,6 +280,26 @@ required structures.") (license license:openssl) (home-page "http://www.openssl.org/"))) =20 +(define-public openssl + (package + (inherit openssl/fixed) + (name "openssl") + (version "1.0.2f") + (source (origin + (method url-fetch) + (uri (list (string-append "ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/" + name "-" version ".tar.gz") + (string-append "ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/old/" + (string-trim-right version char-se= t:letter) + "/" name "-" version ".tar.gz"))) + (sha256 + (base32 + "171fkdg9v6j29d962nh6kb79kfm8kkhy7n9makw39d7jvvj4wawk")) + (patches (map search-patch + '("openssl-runpath.patch" + "openssl-c-rehash.patch"))))) + (replacement openssl/fixed))) + (define-public libressl (package (name "libressl") --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Then you can run things like: guix gc -R $(guix build git | head -1) | grep openssl and compare with: guix gc -R $(guix build git --no-grafts | head -1) | grep openssl There should be exactly one =E2=80=98openssl=E2=80=99 reference in both cas= es; in the first case it should be the replacement, and in the second case the original. Feedback very much welcome! Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-=-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:39:10 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#22139: Indirect dependencies are not grafted Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22139 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22139@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Mark H Weaver , Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 22139-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22139.14568531451439 (code B ref 22139); Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:26:01 +0000 Received: (at 22139) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2016 17:25:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aao3N-0000N9-Kt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:25:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57750) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aao3L-0000Ml-MY for 22139@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:25:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aao3B-0001e7-Dy for 22139@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:25:38 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aao2t-0001Vq-FJ; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:25:15 -0500 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:44986 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aao2o-0005XE-Gb; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:25:10 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <877fkmk5hu.fsf@gnu.org> <8737sb3x9c.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:25:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8737sb3x9c.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:35:59 +0100") Message-ID: <87wppmkt57.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > The =E2=80=98wip-recursive-grafts=E2=80=99 branch fixes that. It also ch= anges > =E2=80=98graft-derivation=E2=80=99 to choose whether to graft something b= ased on its > *run-time* dependencies (as reported by =E2=80=98guix gc -R=E2=80=99) ins= tead of its > compile-time dependencies. Merged in c22a132 and currently being crash-tested by everyone. :-) Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 07 07:21:19 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2016 12:21:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37377 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1acuA3-000650-G9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:21:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1acuA1-00064o-N5 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:21:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acu9v-00017n-UF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:21:12 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acu9v-00017i-R6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:21:11 -0500 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:52622 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1acu9v-0001bU-5W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:21:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:21:09 +0100 Message-Id: <878u1utr62.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #22139 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) close 22139 0.9.1