GNU bug report logs -
#22074
unixware 7.1.4 rm command
Previous Next
Reported by: jhi <at> iki.fi
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:10:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: pending
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 22074 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-automake <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22074
; Package
automake
.
(Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:10:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
jhi <at> iki.fi
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-automake <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:10:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Tried to build GNU tar 1.28 in Unixware 7.1.4 (*), got the below:
(*)
$ uname -a:
UnixWare unixware 5 7.1.4 i386 x86at SCO UNIX_SVR5
$ echo $PATH
/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/opt/java2-1.5.0/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/java/bin
$ sh configure --prefix=/usr/local
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/local/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /usr/local/bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... no
checking whether UID '152' is supported by ustar format... yes
checking whether GID '1' is supported by ustar format... yes
checking how to create a ustar tar archive... plaintar
UX:rm: ERROR: Incorrect usage
UX:rm: TO FIX: Usage: rm [-fiRr] file ...
Oops!
Your 'rm' program seems unable to run without file operands specified
on the command line, even when the '-f' option is present. This is contrary
to the behaviour of most rm programs out there, and not conforming with
the upcoming POSIX standard: <http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=542>
Please tell bug-automake <at> gnu.org about your system, including the value
of your $PATH and any error possibly output before this message. This
can help us improve future automake versions.
Aborting the configuration process, to ensure you take notice of the issue.
You can download and install GNU coreutils to get an 'rm' implementation
that behaves properly: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/>.
If you want to complete the configuration process using your problematic
'rm' anyway, export the environment variable ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM
to "yes", and re-run configure.
configure: error: Your 'rm' program is bad, sorry.
$ which rm
/usr/bin/rm
Added indication that bug 22074 blocks10828
Request was from
Mike Frysinger <vapier <at> gentoo.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Added tag(s) pending.
Request was from
Mike Frysinger <vapier <at> gentoo.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-automake <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22074
; Package
automake
.
(Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #12 received at 22074 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Jarkko - back in 2015
(https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22074, sorry for the
delayed reply) you reported that your system failed the rm -f test.
For the next automake release, we've removed this test and tried to
accept any rm. (More info: https://bugs.gnu.org/10828.)
If you have a chance to try an automake pretest to confirm this
(downloadable from https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/automake-1.16j.tar.gz),
that would be great. --thanks, karl.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 139 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.