GNU bug report logs -
#22069
25.0.50; bogus %S in cl-no-applicable-method message
Previous Next
Reported by: stephen_leake <at> stephe-leake.org
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:15:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 25.0.50
Fixed in version 25.1
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> cl-no-applicable-method: No applicable method for %S: xref-backend-definitions, my-xref-backend, "foo"
> The %S is not used as a `format' argument.
Indeed, I was confused.
> (define-error 'cl-no-applicable-method "No applicable method for %S"
> 'cl-no-method)
This should just be
(define-error 'cl-no-applicable-method "No applicable method"
'cl-no-method)
> -(define-error 'cl-no-method "No method for %S")
> -(define-error 'cl-no-next-method "No next method for %S" 'cl-no-method)
> -(define-error 'cl-no-primary-method "No primary method for %S" 'cl-no-method)
> -(define-error 'cl-no-applicable-method "No applicable method for %S"
> +(define-error 'cl-no-method "No method")
> +(define-error 'cl-no-next-method "No next method" 'cl-no-method)
> +(define-error 'cl-no-primary-method "No primary method" 'cl-no-method)
> +(define-error 'cl-no-applicable-method "No applicable method"
> 'cl-no-method)
Looks good.
> (cl-defgeneric cl-no-next-method (generic method &rest args)
> "Function called when `cl-call-next-method' finds no next method."
> - (signal 'cl-no-next-method `(,(cl--generic-name generic) ,method ,@args)))
> + (signal 'cl-no-next-method (append (list (format "%S" (cl--generic-name generic)) method) args)))
>
> (cl-defgeneric cl-no-applicable-method (generic &rest args)
> "Function called when a method call finds no applicable method."
> - (signal 'cl-no-applicable-method `(,(cl--generic-name generic) ,@args)))
> + (signal 'cl-no-applicable-method
> + (append (list (format "%S" (cl--generic-name generic))) args)))
>
> (cl-defgeneric cl-no-primary-method (generic &rest args)
> "Function called when a method call finds no primary method."
> - (signal 'cl-no-primary-method `(,(cl--generic-name generic) ,@args)))
> + (signal 'cl-no-primary-method (append (list (format (cl--generic-name generic))) args)))
>
> (defun cl-call-next-method (&rest _args)
> "Function to call the next applicable method.
No, these should stay as they are, I think.
Stefan
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 167 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.