GNU bug report logs - #22055
Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#22055: closed (Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:35:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:34:53 +0000
with message-id <CAAdUY-+Y4=_q93gyKVjx5Jmfb9ZLXfinXK4a_+6nEdLcL5OKwg <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#22055: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #22055,
regarding Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
22055: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22055
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:34:37 +0100

The following Elpa packages do not provide a feature: `ada-ref-man',
`transcribe', and `uni-confusables'.  I believe all packages should
contain a library which provides the appropriate feature.

`transcribe' additionally violates many other conventions.  The various
section headers lack the space after the semicolons.  Not a single
symbol is properly prefixed or documented.  It should probably be
removed.

`load-relative' also doesn't provide its feature using `provide', but
that is intentional - it uses the alternative `provide-me' form, which
it itself defines.  I cannot really see what's so great about being
able to write `(provide-me)' instead of `(provide 'the-feature)', but
some people obviously thought it that was a good idea.  Anyway, should
`load-relative' itself really use `provide-me'?

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com>
To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
Cc: 22055-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22055: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:34:53 +0000

Closing the bug then.

2015-12-12 19:36 GMT+00:00 Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>:
>
> Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> 2015-12-03 14:34 GMT+00:00 Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>:
>>>
>>> Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>>> `load-relative' also doesn't provide its feature using `provide', but
>>>>> that is intentional - it uses the alternative `provide-me' form, which
>>>>> it itself defines.
>>>>
>>>> I can't see the benefit but I also can't see the harm. Did it affect you
>>>> negatively in any way?
>>>
>>> No, I just cannot mirror it on the Emacsmirror, but that does not really
>>> matter because I also could not mirror any other package which uses
>>> `provide-me'.  I extract metadata for all mirrored packages, including
>>> the provided features, and the respective code does not support
>>> `provide-me'.  I don't intend to support that form until at least halve
>>> a dozen packages use it.
>>
>> Well, I couldn't find a package Gelpa or Melpa that uses it. So I
>> think it's not really a big deal either way. =P
>
> Yeah, I'll deal with it when the need arises.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.