From unknown Wed Jun 18 00:26:51 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#22055 <22055@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#22055 <22055@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature Reply-To: bug#22055 <22055@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 07:26:51 +0000 retitle 22055 Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature reassign 22055 emacs submitter 22055 Jonas Bernoulli severity 22055 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 29 14:34:45 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2015 19:34:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a37kD-0003do-F1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:34:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a37kB-0003dh-QV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:34:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37kB-0005zI-0k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:34:43 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37kA-0005z7-Ts for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:34:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37kA-0005hu-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:34:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37k6-0005xI-Tx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:34:42 -0500 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:45151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a37k6-0005wy-ND for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:34:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C029D16B36 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:34:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id m2D-3VEuokYu for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:34:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from hal (84-73-67-69.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.67.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97C9616B3B for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:34:37 +0100 (CET) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 25.0.50.1 From: Jonas Bernoulli To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:34:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1usd2gi.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) The following Elpa packages do not provide a feature: `ada-ref-man', `transcribe', and `uni-confusables'. I believe all packages should contain a library which provides the appropriate feature. `transcribe' additionally violates many other conventions. The various section headers lack the space after the semicolons. Not a single symbol is properly prefixed or documented. It should probably be removed. `load-relative' also doesn't provide its feature using `provide', but that is intentional - it uses the alternative `provide-me' form, which it itself defines. I cannot really see what's so great about being able to write `(provide-me)' instead of `(provide 'the-feature)', but some people obviously thought it that was a good idea. Anyway, should `load-relative' itself really use `provide-me'? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 30 04:58:00 2015 Received: (at 22055) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2015 09:58:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60106 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3LDc-0000Nn-8F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:58:00 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:36371) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3LDa-0000Nf-04 for 22055@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:57:58 -0500 Received: by lfs39 with SMTP id 39so186926368lfs.3 for <22055@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:57:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XtgvtTcGWoj+344NW5LLoz947g4mVyK9k1kwZwaYabQ=; b=nzz11f2sy6G++0eyhEWdMCRbaao7VFRvK+VIm+Wt3mTVjHqzv0ZZ7jXg9OFHuIqJon LM6f50m3jXYpj8uFAg4L3BXWgwl0sj20YA8vaXp4lBbUZ7MHTNXacZmiCQWjVP5p5QnU aOIYNHx7AKO6XcBeVRK/44YnkfrI5SL44Zy62kn2EGsTmEQuH5Yja0F+3vfKyjAsT5Rf UPVM3odt8NwJk2Disd76FZ9xRefNH9PHu4JaRDemVTfeo4fPONsu/a1JDXff9Hd/jYiB h4vD//wJkeDpKJmZNHrStcDaetOS8nBDS4SGlbtN58rgpGSqtnQeitxabJk8NVPzXnUm lZzQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.20.217 with SMTP id 86mr24199300lfu.164.1448877477105; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:57:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:57:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:57:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d1usd2gi.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <87d1usd2gi.fsf@bernoul.li> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:57:57 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xOHa0F-zY4A744mWgdzCZ9TYM0Q Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#22055: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature From: Artur Malabarba To: Jonas Bernoulli Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fbf385897e70525bf1371 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22055 Cc: 22055@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a113fbf385897e70525bf1371 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 29 Nov 2015 7:34 pm, "Jonas Bernoulli" wrote: > > The following Elpa packages do not provide a feature: `ada-ref-man', > `transcribe', and `uni-confusables'. I believe all packages should > contain a library which provides the appropriate feature. > > `transcribe' additionally violates many other conventions. The various > section headers lack the space after the semicolons. Not a single > symbol is properly prefixed or documented. It should probably be > removed. I believe Stefan fixed the lack of a provide. And the author has been notified of other issues as well. > `load-relative' also doesn't provide its feature using `provide', but > that is intentional - it uses the alternative `provide-me' form, which > it itself defines. I can't see the benefit but I also can't see the harm. Did it affect you negatively in any way? --001a113fbf385897e70525bf1371 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 29 Nov 2015 7:34 pm, "Jonas Bernoulli" <jonas@bernoul.li> wrote:
>
> The following Elpa packages do not provide a feature: `ada-ref-man'= ;,
> `transcribe', and `uni-confusables'.=C2=A0 I believe all packa= ges should
> contain a library which provides the appropriate feature.
>
> `transcribe' additionally violates many other conventions.=C2=A0 T= he various
> section headers lack the space after the semicolons.=C2=A0 Not a singl= e
> symbol is properly prefixed or documented.=C2=A0 It should probably be=
> removed.

I believe Stefan fixed the lack of a provide. And the author= has been notified of other issues as well.

> `load-relative' also doesn't provide its featur= e using `provide', but
> that is intentional - it uses the alternative `provide-me' form, w= hich
> it itself defines.=C2=A0

I can't see the benefit but I also can't see the har= m. Did it affect you negatively in any way?

--001a113fbf385897e70525bf1371-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 03 09:34:47 2015 Received: (at 22055) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2015 14:34:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37016 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Uy7-0001sp-9I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 09:34:47 -0500 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:38026) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Uy0-0001sa-9N for 22055@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 09:34:41 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A9B16B40; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:34:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id BkNc4sI5f-UG; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:34:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from hal (84-73-67-69.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.67.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC86616B37; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:34:38 +0100 (CET) References: <87d1usd2gi.fsf@bernoul.li> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 25.0.50.1 From: Jonas Bernoulli To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#22055: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:34:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87bna7zjlt.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22055 Cc: 22055@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Artur Malabarba writes: >> `load-relative' also doesn't provide its feature using `provide', but >> that is intentional - it uses the alternative `provide-me' form, which >> it itself defines. > > I can't see the benefit but I also can't see the harm. Did it affect you > negatively in any way? No, I just cannot mirror it on the Emacsmirror, but that does not really matter because I also could not mirror any other package which uses `provide-me'. I extract metadata for all mirrored packages, including the provided features, and the respective code does not support `provide-me'. I don't intend to support that form until at least halve a dozen packages use it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 03 10:41:25 2015 Received: (at 22055) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2015 15:41:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4W0b-0004WP-2n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:41:25 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:35039) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4W0Y-0004W2-LE for 22055@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:41:23 -0500 Received: by lfdl133 with SMTP id l133so92639919lfd.2 for <22055@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 07:41:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HXdKmThMy9L4YVjUoIZSfPkqBS9KIfNvcu93iWijG9Y=; b=DzvOcZYO8jGcira8W1AjBf7o4s3IBPwwek90/xuaen/X4R8BWSdBtsSWAXFRQS7QJS wA/S50GTEgzG04HuitQxHNDhFSaaiI4dIOhFpFdkIraFU6moogQ0JlXlo00wUxlNFBE6 E/lLuHWPBJtvphW8jw/Ehx3LLAtw5+4FyfhbQjZdnjpYfHqIVYme4QvG6YiafAWE6vKZ hMTgbD6sednkI2he4q65PIUwD4wFcxHK0sOiuTcdQ0Zn0+o/jLR4SiL0DWtHjjf02DKo XYjaI69nnknCy6xHpbVtubuVFwW/aOJ7BwK92Yalz2QVZnQKT2gIyLsSTZk5GiYzQFpg UszA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.20.217 with SMTP id 86mr5751283lfu.164.1449157276874; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 07:41:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 07:41:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bna7zjlt.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <87d1usd2gi.fsf@bernoul.li> <87bna7zjlt.fsf@bernoul.li> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:41:16 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U8aiX00pl9JdllB7k0a6La9Fpfs Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#22055: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature From: Artur Malabarba To: Jonas Bernoulli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22055 Cc: 22055@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) 2015-12-03 14:34 GMT+00:00 Jonas Bernoulli : > > Artur Malabarba writes: > >>> `load-relative' also doesn't provide its feature using `provide', but >>> that is intentional - it uses the alternative `provide-me' form, which >>> it itself defines. >> >> I can't see the benefit but I also can't see the harm. Did it affect you >> negatively in any way? > > No, I just cannot mirror it on the Emacsmirror, but that does not really > matter because I also could not mirror any other package which uses > `provide-me'. I extract metadata for all mirrored packages, including > the provided features, and the respective code does not support > `provide-me'. I don't intend to support that form until at least halve > a dozen packages use it. Well, I couldn't find a package Gelpa or Melpa that uses it. So I think it's not really a big deal either way. =P From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 12 14:36:37 2015 Received: (at 22055) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2015 19:36:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49717 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7py9-0001MD-FK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 14:36:37 -0500 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:40584) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7py7-0001Ly-9P for 22055@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 14:36:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFB816A78; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:36:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail0.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id 6wfIAWMTVR3s; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:36:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from hal (84-73-67-69.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.67.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52A1A16A77; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:36:28 +0100 (CET) References: <87d1usd2gi.fsf@bernoul.li> <87bna7zjlt.fsf@bernoul.li> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 25.0.50.1 From: Jonas Bernoulli To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#22055: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature In-reply-to: Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:36:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87bn9vzcgc.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22055 Cc: 22055@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Artur Malabarba writes: > 2015-12-03 14:34 GMT+00:00 Jonas Bernoulli : >> >> Artur Malabarba writes: >> >>>> `load-relative' also doesn't provide its feature using `provide', but >>>> that is intentional - it uses the alternative `provide-me' form, which >>>> it itself defines. >>> >>> I can't see the benefit but I also can't see the harm. Did it affect you >>> negatively in any way? >> >> No, I just cannot mirror it on the Emacsmirror, but that does not really >> matter because I also could not mirror any other package which uses >> `provide-me'. I extract metadata for all mirrored packages, including >> the provided features, and the respective code does not support >> `provide-me'. I don't intend to support that form until at least halve >> a dozen packages use it. > > Well, I couldn't find a package Gelpa or Melpa that uses it. So I > think it's not really a big deal either way. =P Yeah, I'll deal with it when the need arises. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 12 15:35:00 2015 Received: (at 22055-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2015 20:35:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7qse-0002dj-99 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:35:00 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com ([209.85.217.177]:35846) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7qsc-0002dW-OE for 22055-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:34:59 -0500 Received: by lbblt2 with SMTP id lt2so88046811lbb.3 for <22055-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:34:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RaRCqqDm3HsClEeg/9MGUXhWgveD1ve/0Vahpu2jB40=; b=Qz2nmjhE5t1TwmcMft24Ty70jhSUPAzYPp7dcqQF7H2aoadqLCtvPdYmsZIT5IJ+r9 4+6WhsFV13UZfIGXYZjxQRy/9pDjitnOE4Fz8O2nDDplF1K/OzAuSACQMJvUW++Qj1yd CRjYDf53zY4BuppivRD7zyQN5Z9ida3pjkuXBHGckDWYJqlVb+Iyc3MAQ9YJ5vlvgwTX fCCLDgeKAJ5zpIRHpWAUyHwrf3Iuko+acSRhN7imYrSfOLVwreJySz0QJx7KdEKd+gp6 kE5oJJPLKFMp6Zsx0VE0ff3uyonKIAXDHNIX735MkcnudHiWi2I1/0MEhfCc0PfZtPsC jtag== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.168.133 with SMTP id zw5mr10331202lbb.95.1449952493058; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:34:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bn9vzcgc.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <87d1usd2gi.fsf@bernoul.li> <87bna7zjlt.fsf@bernoul.li> <87bn9vzcgc.fsf@bernoul.li> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:34:53 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ogrsFeDrnFEnzlCb3BocDjYXcko Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#22055: Some Elpa packages don't provide a feature From: Artur Malabarba To: Jonas Bernoulli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22055-done Cc: 22055-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Closing the bug then. 2015-12-12 19:36 GMT+00:00 Jonas Bernoulli : > > Artur Malabarba writes: > >> 2015-12-03 14:34 GMT+00:00 Jonas Bernoulli : >>> >>> Artur Malabarba writes: >>> >>>>> `load-relative' also doesn't provide its feature using `provide', but >>>>> that is intentional - it uses the alternative `provide-me' form, which >>>>> it itself defines. >>>> >>>> I can't see the benefit but I also can't see the harm. Did it affect you >>>> negatively in any way? >>> >>> No, I just cannot mirror it on the Emacsmirror, but that does not really >>> matter because I also could not mirror any other package which uses >>> `provide-me'. I extract metadata for all mirrored packages, including >>> the provided features, and the respective code does not support >>> `provide-me'. I don't intend to support that form until at least halve >>> a dozen packages use it. >> >> Well, I couldn't find a package Gelpa or Melpa that uses it. So I >> think it's not really a big deal either way. =P > > Yeah, I'll deal with it when the need arises. From unknown Wed Jun 18 00:26:51 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator