GNU bug report logs - #22054
Potential errors in package--builtins

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#22054: closed (Potential errors in package--builtins)
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:38:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:37:08 +0000
with message-id <CAAdUY-KbmSQOX0-fihren3NvAAD+LJeDO08NnHRVTirhcZ_2Tw <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#22054: Potential errors in package--builtins
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #22054,
regarding Potential errors in package--builtins
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
22054: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22054
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Potential errors in package--builtins
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:24:44 +0100

* `ielm' is missing from the list.  I suspect it is not detected as a
  package because the first line does not contain the summary.  Also,
  shouldn't the "interaction mode for Emacs Lisp" be located inside
  lisp/emacs-lisp/?

* `cl-preload' is listed as a separate package.  That might be
  intentional but wouldn't it make more sense to make it part of
  the `cl-lib' package?

* `eieio-compat' is listed as a separate package.  But I suspect that
  is intentional.  Not sure though.

* `sasl-scram-rfc' is listed as a separate package, but all the other
  `sasl-*' libraries are part of the `sasl' package.

This is for the `emacs-25' branch.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 22054-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#22054: Potential errors in package--builtins
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:37:08 +0000

> Since nobody said anything about the other entries you mentioned being
> intentional, I'll fix them too and we'll see if anyone yells. :)

Fixed in emacs-25

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.