GNU bug report logs - #22054
Potential errors in package--builtins

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
To: bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com
Cc: 22054 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#22054: Potential errors in package--builtins
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:46:54 +0100

Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 2015-11-29 19:24 GMT+00:00 Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>:
>> * `ielm' is missing from the list.  I suspect it is not detected as a
>>   package because the first line does not contain the summary.
>
> No. It needs a version number to be considered a package. But then,
> why should it be on the list? Is it also provided in one of the
> archives?

Why not?  It is a self-contained package, just like many other
self-contained packages, which are listed as individual packages.  I
cannot see a reason why these other packages should be treated as such,
but not this one.

There are other libraries which one might argue should, or should not,
be considered to be individual packages, but in this case it seems
pretty clear to me that it should be a package, because many other
libraries "just like it" are.

>> * `cl-preload' is listed as a separate package.
>>
>> * `eieio-compat' is listed as a separate package.  But I suspect that
>>   is intentional.  Not sure though.
>>
>> * `sasl-scram-rfc' is listed as a separate package, but all the other
>>   `sasl-*' libraries are part of the `sasl' package.
>
> Assuming you mean cl-preloadED.el...

Yes.

> Maybe someone just fixed it but none of these are listed as built-ins
> for me.

On the `emacs-25' branch, they all have an individual entry in
`package--builtins'.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.