GNU bug report logs -
#22000
25.0.50; Running dired changes frame width, gtk_distribute_natural_allocation throws assertion
Previous Next
Full log
Message #150 received at 22000 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Assuming nil behaviour = menu bar is truncated when too wide but
> has no scrollbar and no extra padding - GTK < 3.16 can't do this
> without either implementing a custom widget or providing the
> equivalent of GTK_POLICY_EXTERNAL.
>
> 3.16+:
> always - scrollbar always present, menu bar would be vertically
> padded but we compress it with CSS
> automatic - similar, but scrollbar disappears when not required
> forced-resize - no scrollbar and no padding. frame will resize
> semi-predictably when the menu bar's natural size
> exceeds that of the frame.
> nil - no scrollbar, menu would be vertically padded but
> we compress it with CSS. menu bar is truncated
> if it tries to extend past the frame edge.
>
> 3.16-:
> always - scrollbar always present, menu bar is vertically
> padded. does not appear to bepossible to fix
> this with CSS.
> automatic - similar, but scrollbar disappears when not required
> forced-resize - no scrollbar and no padding. frame will resize
> semi-predictably when the menu bar's natural size
> exceeds that of the frame.
> nil - identical to forced-resize for these GTK versions
Good. We could for the 3.16- nil case do what you did earlier with
the extra padding but I think that having this as default would harm
more than do any good. So let's stick to this your proposal - it's
the most sane approach I can think of at the moment.
> To clarify - a user can _try_ to manually resize the frame but sooner
> or later (usually sooner) the gdk timer fires and gtk notices that
> the menu bar wants more space and resizes the frame. Depending on
> your exact GTK version and the phase of the moon you _may_ be able
> to dodge this forced resize but you cannot reliably do so.
Yes. I forgot about this timer issue.
>> of the Options menu. Provided we can add/remove a menu bar scrollbar
>> dynamically to/from an existing frame. No great harm if we can't
>
> We can, I've been testing this to make sure it works.
Fine.
> Currently working on updating the patches to address these points (and the others to which I have not replied specifically here) - will probably
> send an updated series tomorrow (2018-10-16)
We'll then have to discuss with Eli whether to apply this to Emacs
26.2 or to master.
Thanks, martin
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 266 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.