GNU bug report logs - #21998
Run 'make change-history' on release branch

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:09:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Found in version 25.0.50

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #72 received at 21998 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: 21998 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? (Was: bug#21998: Run 'make
 change-history' on release branch)
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:26:49 +0200
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 14:34:12 -0800
> Cc: 21998 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> John Wiegley wrote:
> > What do you all think about ChangeLogs, and their value
> > to you in your work on Emacs?
> 
> I regularly do the equivalent of:
> 
> grep PATTERN $(git ls-files | grep -v ChangeLog)
> 
> That is, in searches I typically ignore ChangeLog* files because of their 
> less-useful chatter.

It is a truism that when you know ChangeLog files don't included the
information you are after, you'd like to exclude them.  Likewise, when
I'm looking for information that can only be found in ChangeLog files,
I will filter out everything else as "less-useful chatter".

> Even if we remove ChangeLogs, we should still have guidelines for commit message 
> format

We won't be able to enforce that rule for long.  It's a slippery
slope.  Very slippery.




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 76 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.