Subject: Re: bug#21981: request: dired: require dired-x by default

From: John Wiegley <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:06:38 -0800

>>>>> Glenn Morris <[email-masked]> writes:

> AFAIK we are still waiting for someone to
>   [add] the remaining useful functionality of dired-x into dired and
>   then [make] dired-x obsolete.

I would prefer this also, rather than pulling in all of dired-x. Michael,
would you like to review the parts of dired-x that should move over?

John