GNU bug report logs - #21953
Eliminate warnings in the emacs-25 release branch

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: John Wiegley <jwiegley <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:45:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: John Wiegley <jwiegley <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: John Wiegley <jwiegley <at> gmail.com>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 21953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>, dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: bug#21953: Eliminate warnings in the emacs-25 release branch
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:05:31 -0800
>>>>> Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com> writes:

> At least on Windows, that's not entirely true. I compile with very pedantic
> switches.

I'd love to address those as well, although I can't make it a blocker for
release. GNU platforms will have to determine the "gold standard", even if we
make it a point of pride to tackle warnings everywhere we find them.

On that note (and I think I mentioned in another thread), I'm working with
aconole on IRC to get the Coverity build up and running again regularly, which
should produce another volume of warnings to scan through. If it works well,
it should be like getting some free code review on our C. We'll see.

Finally, there is running under valgrind, and addressing warnings that appear
there too.

I would be quite happy if the 25.x cycle emphasized correctness and fewer bugs
over "headline features" leading up 26. It might not be as sexy or print-
worthy, but it builds a better foundation for future contributors.

John




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 256 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.