GNU bug report logs - #21945
Bug: Build dependency gperf

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#21945: closed (Bug: Build dependency gperf)
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 04:31:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:30:15 -0800
with message-id <CA+8g5KEbEE6RS9rbSr+=yRDuN=KFwECxS73VFWCfuq5=tj7jgg <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#21945: Bug: Build dependency gperf
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #21945,
regarding Bug: Build dependency gperf
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
21945: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21945
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stephan Müller <muellste <at> math.hu-berlin.de>
To: bug-diffutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: Bug: Build dependency gperf
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:53:44 +0100

Hello,

building difftools (from Oct 2015) fails without gperf. A check for
gperf should be added to the configure script.

I am not really into it, but autoconf should be able to recognize this
dependency itself? Any Ideas?

 ~stephan

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Stephan Müller <muellste <at> math.hu-berlin.de>
Cc: 21945-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#21945: Bug: Build dependency gperf
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:30:15 -0800

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Stephan Müller
<muellste <at> math.hu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> building difftools (from Oct 2015) fails without gperf. A check for
> gperf should be added to the configure script.
>
> I am not really into it, but autoconf should be able to recognize this
> dependency itself? Any Ideas?

Thank you for the report. That was a bug, indeed.
The attached patch records the requirement in bootstrap.conf,
so that those building from DVCS notice it. Others should not
require gperf, because the gperf-generated files are always
generated and up-to-date in a distribution tarball.

[0001-build-add-gperf-to-the-list-of-required-programs.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.