GNU bug report logs - #21934
24.5; find-tag: reading TAGS file incorrectly

Previous Next

Full log

Message #101 received at 21934 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Andreas Matthias <andreas.matthias <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 21934 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: Re: bug#21934: 24.5; find-tag: reading TAGS file incorrectly
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:16:41 +0200

> From: Andreas Matthias <andreas.matthias <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: dgutov <at> yandex.ru,  21934 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:50:40 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >> From: Andreas Matthias <andreas.matthias <at> gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  21934 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 18:49:32 +0100
> >> 
> >> >> Can there be
> >> >> more than one of these in a token, and if so, what should etags do?
> >> >> IOW, if we have foo.bar.baz or foo:bar.baz etc., what should be the
> >> >> result?
> >> >
> >> > Just two, I think. foo.bar is not a function, and bar.baz probably won't be a
> >> > "symbol at point".
> >> >
> >> > So just the fully qualified tag name, and the local tag name ("baz").
> >> 
> >> Yes, that's reasonable.
> >
> > I'm sorry: can I have a complete specification, please?  Given a
> > token that includes one or more of '.' and ':', how to determine the 2
> > tags that etags should produce?
> 
> See `funcname' in:
> 
> http://www.lua.org/manual/5.3/manual.html#9

Thanks, but that's not all the information I need.  What's missing is
which part(s) of a funcname would you like etags to record.  Do you
want each "Name" component to be recorded, or just some of them?

IOW, if we have foo.bar.baz.more, what should be recorded in addition
to the whole foo.bar.baz.more token?  Just bar.baz.more, or something
else?  What about foo.bar.baz:more?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.